The Ultimate M4S Insider
by Gene Yetter
Turbochargers, twin cams and other performance components are available to make a car powered by an economical four-cylinder engine go fast. Maybe elevating the engine to the non-economical class! But what if the car has to go faster than mechanical modifications can deliver? Really fast, like a race car. After engine development, aerodynamics become a factor. To boost performance further, design or modify the car to cut efficiently through the air mass it impacts as it accelerates.
Indy race fans and Mopar fans should, and usually do, know of one memorable Dodge-branded car built with heavy emphasis on aerodynamics: the twin-turbo, mid-engine 2.2 Liter M4S Pace Car, a one-off effort sponsored by PPG Industries. Its build began in 1983 and it benefitted from development by Chrysler Corp. special-project engineers, a few independent Motor City shops and one lead Mopar automotive designer, Bob Ackerman, who retired from Chrysler in 1996 and presently lives in West Bloomfield, Michigan. The car set its own top speed record at 194.8 miles an hour with its engine outputting 440 horsepower at 25 psi maximum boost. Its coefficient of drag was an extraordinary 0.236.
First appearing in public at the Detroit Auto Show in January 1986, the M4S was trucked to Arizona weeks later to be featured in a film in which it was to be the ride of an enforcer from outer space known as, The Wraith. The futuristic car went on that year to run as a pace car at Indy series events at tracks around the U.S. Years later, before a Le Mans-winning, 8-Liter V-10 Viper went on display at the Walter P. Chrysler Museum in Auburn Hills, the retired M4S had the distinction of being the fastest car in the Museum’s collection.
allpar.com has posted other pages about the M4S, including a conversation with Joe Pappas, logistics coordinator for the duration of the car's build and its Indy pace-car career; articles about, and pictures of, the original car at the Chrysler Museum; coverage of the car in the "The Wraith" film; and coverage of an M4S replica restored by car collector Lyle Suhr of Wichita, Kansas. In this article, Bob Ackerman recounts his story of the M4S. We also link to Bob’s own Web advertisement which offers dramatic M4S posters for sale.
According to Bob's personal log book, the pace car project got started at a meeting of Chrysler and PPG reps at the Chrysler design facility in Highland Park, Michigan, on June 13, 1983. This was in the complex of historic buildings that hailed back to the days when Walter P. still lead the company. PPG had been engaged with Big Three car companies in that period in developing many pace cars. In the case of a new pace car from Chrysler, PPG wanted it to be capable of reaching 200 miles an hour. The previous pace car in the Mopar line was a 1984 Daytona Turbo Z that had run at 175 mph.
Several pace cars serve on the same date at Indy events, and the cars are driven in a pack for an opening parade lap. Bob explains the ritual: "Passenger and driver arms are extended to wave to the crowd in the grandstands. Passengers are VIPs or guests of sponsoring companies. When a car is actually pacing a race, the driver concentrates on driving while the passenger holds out his arm. He is wearing an orange glove. He signals for one more lap when the car behind him on the pole position is ready to go. Then the pace car leaves the track. The race cars lap once more and then get the green flag to start the race. As many as eight cars might be available for pacing duties at any one race. Cars take turns starting or restarting the race. Mechanical problems could force a car to retire on a date, allowing the next car to move up in the rotation.
"A lot of pace cars came out of Chrysler and Dodge," Bob explains. "Before the M4S, they were just modified production cars. Daytona’s and such, that were turbocharged, perhaps, and performance enhanced in every way. They would put special paint on them. One Daytona was a departure with gull-wing doors and a big wing on the back. When this new PPG project came up, the director in the design office, Neil Walling, assigned me to style the car’s exterior. ‘Pick the kind of car you want,’ he said. ‘Have fun. Go wild!’”
Three independent automotive support shops in the Detroit area also had major roles in the M4S project. They were Specialized Vehicles, Inc. (co-owned by founding Ramchargers member and retired Chrysler engineer, Tom Coddington), of Troy, Michigan; 3-D Industries, Inc., of Madison Heights; and, Special Projects, Inc., of Plymouth. SVI built the engine and the roll cage; it also assembled the powertrain and body; and, it kept the car running for the months of its pace-car service. 3-D Industries modeled the car in clay and produced body-part molds. Special Projects cast the body parts, did final paint and the interior.
“I enjoyed working with all of the talented and enthusiastic employees of the three shops,” Bob comments. “Like Kenny Yanez at Special Projects who was especially resourceful in coming up with solutions to a few problems. Odd things, like a Buick alligator hinge, installed backwards, to actuate the front clip, and a go-kart pivot mechanism that solved a problem with the car’s scissor doors. The painter of the original car, Richard Cornell, was also with Special Projects. First the car was painted black; then I believe they painted every coat of pearl up to its final color, which I call ‘root beer brown.’ On top of that they put five coats of clear. It was a marvelous paint job.”
At the initial meeting with PPG executives, Bob suggested a pace car that looked more like a race car. "I was inspired by the cars running in IMSA (International Motor Sports Assoc.) series races,” Bob explains, “like the Porsche 962 GTP. Especially their aerodynamics, an important feature being the tail end that is abruptly cut off behind smooth body contours.
“That tail-end design is called a 'Kamm back' after a German scientist, Dr. Kamm. A teardrop narrowing to eight degrees above horizontal is the ideal aerodynamic shape for a car, but a design actually extending to the point of the teardrop would be too long. Kamm figured out in the Thirties that you can cut off the extreme point of the teardrop. He found that the negative effect on aerodynamics by shortening the tail is insignificant; and that pressure actually builds up at the rear of the car that helps performance. So all of these cars that you see with a lip on the back and a spoiler, the NASCARs, the Le Mans Series cars, have embodied this concept for years and years. It's the abrupt cutoff. Look at the back end of a Corvette, how brutally flat it is in back. That's for a good reason!
“At the meeting everyone agreed with my suggestion and we got going on it. The highly modified engine was to be based on the standard Chrysler 2.2 Liter Four cylinder block. But we soon realized Chrysler couldn't support a chassis for the performance that was expected. I had seen a Sports Car Graphic Magazine issue (Oct. 20, 1983) which featured cutaway drawings and a centerfold showing the chassis of the Pontiac Fiero GT. [Editor’s note: Bob is referring to a racing chassis designed to support a body resembling the Fiero GT, not to a production car chassis.] It was custom built by the Huffaker outfit in California. I took my drawing of the M4S to my home studio one night and proportioned it to fit over the Huffaker mock-up. I showed the scaled drawings to management on Oct. 26, 1983. Then I proposed to PPG that we purchase this Huffaker chassis. PPG agreed and reps Jon Hall and Pete Lindgren went to California to talk to Joe Huffaker. The company had purchased parts from Huffaker before so they had no problem releasing the chassis to PPG. But I wanted a longer wheelbase than its length in the Fiero: 100.3 inches compared with the Fiero’s 93 and a half inches. We ordered our chassis in two halves, to give us a head start on the modification.”
Elegant feature of the tail end is its integrated spoiler which is not visible from the sides. Bob explains, “Vice president of design at the time was Don DeLarossa and I got my orders from him. He said, I don't want ‘any damn spoilers showing from the side view!’ So my marching orders were, I could design any car and make it look good but without a big spoiler. So in the side view you don't see the wing on the tail end. There are pictures around showing a large Daytona-like wing on the back, but that was only for testing. It was removed before the Auto Show in 1986 and before the filming of The Wraith movie.
“Wings on cars come from aviation wing design. You turn the thing upside down to get downforce instead of lift. I designed the rear wing on the M4S to be adjustable. It would have been raised in real time to increase downforce. But the wing was never actually made to adjust. Another feature that didn’t make it on the final car, the taillights – which were supposed to be sequential. They show up behind full-width plastic lens covered by a horizontal bezel.
“In fact, Chrysler aerodynamics people were interested in the M4S. They wanted to do what they call ‘active aero’ experiments with it. That’s when you are making aero adjustments while the car is moving. Besides an adjustable rear wing, I had planned two other adjustable spoilers. One in the’ kickup’ opening under the headlight assembly, and another, under the tail section. Aft of the rear wheel the bottom sweeps up real fast. I had designed a wing there to control air coming under the car, like on Formula 1 cars. One of the company’s aero engineers, Dick Lajoie, was all excited about the car. He even put aside some money for the program. But it came to nothing. In the end, that wasn’t anyone’s bad decision. They probably just couldn’t manage it within their budget.”
Drawings of the tube chassis and other parts were ready by the time the halved Huffaker unit was delivered. SVI technicians put it together for the 100.3-inch wheelbase and built the rollcage. After sketches of the body exterior and full-size drawings were completed in Highland Park, the build of a full-size clay-over-foam model was outsourced to 3-D Industries, Inc. They started on a space buck (foundation for the model) around Nov. 30, 1983, according to Bob’s log book.
Bob explains, “In the picture of me at 3-D Industries, I'm adjusting ‘dams,' small metal flanges in the clay surface that set edges of the female molds. The molds have to be lifted straight off the model. There can't be any negative surfaces gripping around the edges of the part. After the female molds came off the M4S model, around Feb. 20, 1984, they were sent to Special Projects to cast body parts. When finished, all body parts were roughly assembled at SVI for aero testing. A functional interior was modeled and fabricated at Special Projects.
"In late February 1984, a team of Chrysler aero people and SVI techs took the car for aero testing to the Lockheed wind tunnel at Marietta, Georgia. I have old memos indicating we were there to start testing on Feb. 28th. We had only 17 hours of tunnel time scheduled. That isn’t a lot. One of the Lockheed operators told us that when Ford goes down there, they would take 17 hours just to balance scales. Tunnel time is very expensive. If I remember, it was something like eighty dollars a minute. We actually shared time with Kal Showket, who was there aero testing a Daytona race car. In the picture of me in front of the turbine, I'm wearing my work clothes. A lot of times you jump into the tunnel when they shut it down even before the wind stops blowing. You don’t waste any time getting in there to make changes and work clothes are the uniform of the day.
"Wind tunnel models are made so that you can make quick changes. The crew of modelers and fabricators may want to rush in to change things as quickly as possible. On the M4S project, the engineers wanted me to do a ‘NACA scoop’ on the sides. This is a common form of low-drag air inlet design, originally developed by the U.S. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), the precursor to NASA.
“NACA scoops are triangular, deep and wide. I didn't like the looks of it on the M4S. So, in advance, I styled the scoop we eventually used and had a cast made of it. After the aero test with the NACA scoop, my design was swapped in and it came out aerodynamically better than the NACA scoop. SVI techs with us in Marietta included a very fast metal fabricator, Ron Fournier. He could pound metal into shape and have it pop-riveted on a car in no time! I don’t know if he was responsible for cutting out the NACA scoop and then pop-riveting my scoop in its place, but that is the sort of thing he was there for.”
The M4S’s design enabled it to achieve a co-efficient of drag (Cd) of 0.236. "That was very good at the time for an actual running car with big wide tires," Bob notes. "It's extremely good. The Cd for a new Corvette is 0.34. Most sedans are around 0.35, or even 0.37. So when you get down below 0.3 you're in pretty good territory. There have been some Ford and GM cars below 0.2. But they have little narrow tires. They are not your average street car or race car by a long shot. You can do things just to achieve low figures, but if it's not in the real world, what does it mean? The ground effects material, the black rubber skirt on the front and sides, helped to reduce air coming under the car. The engineers were skeptical about the skirt but it brought down our Cd and really made the aero sing!
“In my professional capacity, I am a designer. We used to be called ‘stylists.’ We are not design engineers. We make the car look good. The M4S was an exterior job, an aero job. The interior was just functional. I think they bought Recaro seats and Stewart-Warner instruments. We put something together one night with clay as far as the shapes went. It was never intended to have to have a show-car interior.”
“Side view mirrors are actually motorcycle sport mirrors that I bought at a local motorcycle accessories shop. They are manually adjusted. The opening on the side windows is made just big enough that the driver can reach an arm through it to adjust the mirrors. Doors open from the horizontal design line. The portion of the side below the line, housing the scoop, is really a sill.
“When I was presenting the M4S to Lee Iacocca in the Styling Dome in Highland Park, I told him about an experience I had in Miami when the car was there to pace the Indy Car race. There was a gentleman who said he had five Ferraris. He asked when the M4S would go on sale because he wanted one! He said, ‘I would get rid of my Ferraris in a minute if I could have one.’ I thought that was a good Italian car story to tell Iacocca. It fell on deaf ears.
“What did catch Iacocca’s attention was the color of the wheels. A lady executive at PPG had selected the car's body color. I thought of it as ‘root beer brown.’ I had approved of the color. But she also selected mauve for the pace-car lettering on the side and for the spokes of the BBS wheel centers. Lee Iacocca was smoking a cigar as he looked the car over. ‘I'll be damned,’ he said. ‘Almost 200 miles an hour and pink wheels!’
“When Mr. Iacocca was reviewing the car I was hoping he wouldn't try to get in because, even more so than with a 300 SL Mercedes, you have to step over this wide, high sill to get down into the car. It's not the most graceful thing to do for a guy wearing a business suit. He didn't attempt it, and I was happy about that.
“But one other note about the color! A friend of mine from General Motors said, ‘Hey, Ackerman! You really made a mistake with your color. If you had made it red it would have been on every auto magazine cover in the United States. He was probably right because if you count the number of red cars you see on the magazine covers it's pretty extensive.
"Early on, I was in an engineering meeting with Chrysler engineers Larry Rathgeb, Joe Pappas, Tom Coddington and Mike Koran (co-owner with Tom of SVI). My role in the project was to design the exterior. The engineers specified a transverse mounted 2.2 liter engine. I suggested that, if the engine goes in longitudinal, 'north-south', we could get an English Hewland gearbox or a German ZF gearbox. Those units offered both an infinite amount of gear ratios that you could get with the transmission and a quick-change feature. It's an absolute must on a race car that you have a quick-change capability. Your gear ratios are often wrong from one race course to another and you have to change gears. So I believe we just ran out of gearing on this car. As Joe Pappas implied in his allpar interview, the car's weakest point was its transmission. They spent a lot of money to come up with one that would hold up, and still it was prone to breaking down. I guess the engineers were of a mind, Chrysler is selling K cars with transverse engines. Let's not change that.
"I don't want to be too critical because it's been twenty-plus years down the line. It's all history. I was quite disappointed that the car didn't go over 200. It would have been a big deal then for a 2.2 liter engine. ‘Over 200 miles an hour,’ compared to ‘194.8 miles an hour.’ Two hundred just sounds better. Quite frankly I was hoping for 205, 210, 212, because I think the car was capable of it with the right gearing.
“Suspension on the M4S could be raised in order to drive it on and off transporters. When it was shown it was often left in transport mode. One year at ‘Eyes on Design,’ a local concours here in Detroit, I was embarrassed seeing the car sitting high like a kit car. Even at the Chrysler Museum, I was after them for three years to lower it. I offered to get someone over from SVI to do it. I understand a new curator has seen to the adjustment.
"On one early speed run the car hit a deer that darted across the track. Graham McRae, 1973 Indy Rookie of the Year, was at the wheel driving at almost 180 miles an hour. He came back to the paddock area a little shaken up. On impact the fiberglass caved in and snapped out, cracking paint and exposing the white gel coat underneath. It looked like someone had thrown a bucket of white paint at the car.
“The car was finished in ’85. Then the movie situation arose. I was asked by Tom Gale, who was then a director at the design office, what I thought about the car being in a movie. I said I wasn’t excited about it. I said, this is a legitimate car and Hollywood has a way of making cars into jokes. I mentioned the Lincoln Futura that became Batman and Robin’s car. I said I wouldn’t want the M4S to become another Batmobile.
“Over my objection, the car was sent to Arizona in February 1986 for the filming. However, the M4S doesn’t actually appear in the final cut. The car in the movie is always one or another of the dune buggy replicas. A few of us went for our first viewing of the movie. A marketing executive seeing it begin became so upset and he got up and left the theater.
Black-and-white movie publicity photo shows the real scissor-doored M4S and The Wraith character in sci-fi garb. The car was in Arizona for filming in February 1986. However, it never actually appears in the film, which features dune-buggy replicas with gull-wing doors. SVI tech Steve Maki, who was in charge of the car at the location, reported it did get filmed once on a Sonoran Desert road. He was at the wheel wearing The Wraith’s helmet. Steve said, “I went through the movie twice recently looking for the M4S but never spotted it. Either that sequence ended up ‘on the cutting room floor,’ or they were just pretending to film.”
“But in retrospect this car wouldn’t be getting the attention it’s getting now if it weren't for that silly movie. I know damn well, that’s the truth. It would have just become a work in the Chrysler museum collecting dust.”
That the M4S is still of interest to car enthusiasts today is clear by its presence on the World Wide Web mostly in connection with the movie. Also, the replica restored by Lyle Suhr drew much attention at the 2010 Carlisle All-Chrysler Nationals where it was presented in the T Building, the traditional venue for invitation-only classic and collector vehicles. Bob was present for that event, standing by to talk to visitors about the original M4S.
“Lyle came for a visit to Detroit from Wichita,” Bob recalls. “I arranged entry for him into the Chrysler Museum to see the ‘real’ M4S. I told the curator Lyle wanted to look in, out and under it. In the basement where the car is displayed, after a few minutes, Lyle looks up and says, ‘This isn't like my car at all! It's made like an airplane!’ All the welds and all the finesse that went into putting the M4S together but don’t show well in pictures become striking when you see the car close up for the first time.
“No! That's a disappointment. I got to ride in it one time at Chelsea with Joe Pappas driving. The aero was so good there was almost no wind noise. When the run was over, I said to Joe, ‘Well, how fast do you think we went?’ There was still no speedometer in the car. Judging on rpm’s and what Joe knew about the car, he put our speed at about 165 miles an hour. But it felt like going down the expressway at 75. That's the only time I was ever in the car. I had a brother visiting from Oregon with me on that date and Joe gave him a ride also. My brother was pretty thrilled.”
Bob acknowledges having owned 45 Mopars. The fastest were a V-10 Viper and, second, a 1970 Challenger 440 Six-Pack. For looks his all-time favorites are the 1971 Plymouth Satellite Sebring and the 1996 Chrysler Sebring convertible. But, he “also liked the looks of the ’94 through ’97 LHS Chrysler, which I had a lot to do with.” His current ride is a 2011 Chrysler 300.
Automotive designer Robert Ackerman was born and grew up in Connecticut. He studied design at the Art Center School in Los Angeles. When he was a student there a major percentage of car designers at companies around the world came out of that institution. Bob’s career included design work at North American Aviation and General Motors. At GM he worked in the Chevrolet and Oldsmobile design studios. Not happy with the level of acceptance of some of his designs at General Motors, he landed a job at Chrysler in the Dodge design studio in 1969. In his first assignment, he worked on the ’72-74 Challenger. He retired from Chrysler in 1996, never regretting the move from General Motors.
Bob said, “When Chrysler went through one of its down cycles, I wondered if I had made the right choice. But I am pleased that I did. I had more freedom at Chrysler. There was a more relaxed atmosphere. I spent 27 years at Chrysler, after almost ten years at General Motors.”
Concept cars are often made so a car’s feel can be evaluated, problems can be foreseen, and reactions of the public can be judged. Some concepts test specific ideas, colors, controls, or materials — either subtle or out of proportion, to hide what’s being tested. Some are created to help designers think “out of the box.” The Challenger, Prowler, PT Cruiser, and Viper were all tested as production-based concepts dressed up to hide the production intent.
Concept cars • popular: Firepower • Tomahawk • ME412 • Mighty FC • Gladiator
More Mopar Car and Truck News
Dodge Ready To Return To NASCAR? • Death of the Pentastar V6 • 2018 Jeep Cherokee better bring it......