Jump to content

Welcome to Allpar Forums for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Plymouth, and more

Welcome to Allpar Forums for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Plymouth, and more, like most online communities you must register to post in our community (and to view some of the forums), but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Add events to our community calendar
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message © 2009 DevFuse

News Forum Rules

For news and rumors (not op-ed pieces) related to Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles, and other automakers where relevant to Chrysler.

Please do not post large sections of news stories and other copyrighted material from other sites - post a link to the site (just put their URL on a separate line) - respect their intellectual property!

Key links: Upcoming Vehicles - How sales figures are calculated - Flex manufacturing - Latest news - Fuel discussions
Threads moved to the wiki: Future Models List - Current and Future Platform Codes - Transmissions

Register and log in now! Then you can avoid seeing all these ads!

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Phoenix Engines V6 For The Ram? Rate Topic: -----

#41 User is offline   MoparNorm 

  • Active
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 1,707
  • Joined: 02-August 08
  • Location:SoCal

Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:51 PM

View PostSptFury, on 09 November 2009 - 01:49 PM, said:

Is M-B to still get some of the Pentastar V6 production?


We could, but we should treat Daimler the same way they treated us. Get them to convert their entire line to accept only Pentastars and then after giving them the first motor at our cost, every succeeding motor is $450,000 each..... :angry:
0

#42 User is offline   browens1534 

  • Active
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 356
  • Joined: 06-April 08

Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:01 PM

View PostShadowRider, on 09 November 2009 - 08:19 PM, said:

I think they will just build their own and give it a different name.

I don't think it is.. I have read that the Pentastar was to be used by Hyundai also. But those plans are done, and I assume the same for the DBAG version.

This post has been edited by browens1534: 09 November 2009 - 11:01 PM

0

#43 User is offline   superduckie5000 

  • THE MAD DUCK
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 443
  • Joined: 25-November 02
  • Location:SE Michigan

Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:48 PM

From the Inside of Trenton South.
My Friends There Told Me the the New Bosses Absolutely Want the Trenton South Plant Running at Full Capacity One Year From Now Period. They Also Asked, How Can They Get the Machine Shop to Run 10% Faster.
Sound Like They Want to Put the New V-6's to Work.
Now the Question:
How Far Behind is the Mexican Phoenix Plant?
I Heard It Was Delayed Because of Our Problems.

The Mad Duck
0

#44 User is offline   drew54 

  • Active
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 01-August 08
  • Location:IOWA

Posted 10 November 2009 - 09:29 AM

View Postsuperduckie5000, on 09 November 2009 - 10:48 PM, said:

From the Inside of Trenton South.
My Friends There Told Me the the New Bosses Absolutely Want the Trenton South Plant Running at Full Capacity One Year From Now Period. They Also Asked, How Can They Get the Machine Shop to Run 10% Faster.
Sound Like They Want to Put the New V-6's to Work.
Now the Question:
How Far Behind is the Mexican Phoenix Plant?
I Heard It Was Delayed Because of Our Problems.

The Mad Duck


What would be a reasonable number of engines produced per day at a plant that ran 24/7? Would that be cheaper to have one plant at full capacity that bringing the one in Mexico online?
0

#45 User is offline   dana44 

  • Lives Here
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 9,252
  • Joined: 17-June 02
  • Location:National City, CA

Posted 11 November 2009 - 02:44 AM

View Postdrew54, on 10 November 2009 - 06:29 AM, said:

What would be a reasonable number of engines produced per day at a plant that ran 24/7? Would that be cheaper to have one plant at full capacity that bringing the one in Mexico online?



Two reasons I would think two plants would be better than running one 24/7.

Ability to conduct maintenance during down time.
Less spent to ship engines all over the place.
Problems at one plant could prevent full shutdown of the whole line.

I guess there are three good reasons to have two plants.
1

#46 User is offline   drew54 

  • Active
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 01-August 08
  • Location:IOWA

Posted 11 November 2009 - 09:28 AM

View Postdana44, on 11 November 2009 - 01:44 AM, said:

Two reasons I would think two plants would be better than running one 24/7.

Ability to conduct maintenance during down time.
Less spent to ship engines all over the place.
Problems at one plant could prevent full shutdown of the whole line.

I guess there are three good reasons to have two plants.


Good points that I was not thinking of. In a perfect world where nothing breaks, or needs maintenance one plant will do. Sadly there is no perfect world.
0

#47 User is offline   superduckie5000 

  • THE MAD DUCK
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 443
  • Joined: 25-November 02
  • Location:SE Michigan

Posted 11 November 2009 - 02:55 PM

The Mexican Penastar Plant May Be Past the Point of No Return in Tooling It Up.

I Belive the Trenton Full Prod. # is Around 440,000.

The Mad Duck

This post has been edited by superduckie5000: 11 November 2009 - 02:57 PM

0

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic



Allpar Home · Cars · Engines · Repairs · People · Car Reviews · News · Videos

Please read the terms of use. We are not affiliated with Chrysler, LLC, makers of cars, minivans, trucks, and Mopar parts. We make no guarantees regarding validity or applicability of information, opinions, or advice. Posts may be edited and used in other parts of allpar.com and affiliated Mopar-related sites. We have the right to remove or modify any message, or ban or suspend any user without notice. Logos and site-specific information copyright © 2001-2009 Allpar LLC; Chrysler car PR materials remain property of Chrysler, LLC.