Jump to content

Welcome to Allpar Forums for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Plymouth, and more

Welcome to Allpar Forums for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Plymouth, and more, like most online communities you must register to post in our community (and to view some of the forums), but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Add events to our community calendar
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message © 2009 DevFuse

Rules

If it's yours, post it! If it's someone else's, post a link and give credit.

If you don't like someone's work don't be rude about it. If you're going to be critical, be civil about it, especially if you haven't posted any images yourself. If you can offer positive recommendations or changes, even better.

Register and log in now! Then you can avoid seeing all these ads!

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

L, Y not a 2 door Charger?

#1 Guest_plum500_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 28 January 2008 - 02:55 PM

If you were a registered user, you would not be seeing this!

Reaches back to 1st gen, right through to 3rd.



...some of the yella.

Attached File(s)


0

#2 User is offline   CherokeeVision 

  • Unusually Active
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 1,353
  • Joined: 09-December 04

Posted 28 January 2008 - 03:26 PM

Not bad at all. For my tastes the nose could use a little more 3rd generation. But really what I want is a good sleek looking 4 door to replace our '94 Vision. The '99 concept offered that.
0

#3 Guest_plum500_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 29 January 2008 - 09:32 AM

Thanks. I might see if I can tweak that front some, but I'm actually kinda happy with it. When you say more 3rd gen, do you mean the top curve of the fender, overall shape, or length?

If I was drawing something else, it could have four doors, but not this :) I wasn't much of a fan of the '99 concept really. I ended up liking it more by comparison, but it really didn't do it for me either.
0

#4 User is offline   D0C 

  • Prolific
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 2,357
  • Joined: 02-October 03
  • Location:Sterling, VA

Posted 29 January 2008 - 10:11 AM

If you were a registered user, you would not be seeing this!

Can you make a wagon version?
j/k
Nice work, I like it a lot.
In your mind, how does the size of this compare to the current Challenger and Charger?



But, just for the record, I do think a wagon in this style would look cool.... I just would not want it related to the Charger in anyway.
0

#5 Guest_plum500_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 29 January 2008 - 10:30 AM

View PostD0C, on Jan 29 2008, 11:11 AM, said:

Can you make a wagon version?
j/k
Nice work, I like it a lot.
In your mind, how does the size of this compare to the current Challenger and Charger?



But, just for the record, I do think a wagon in this style would look cool.... I just would not want it related to the Charger in anyway.



Thanks.

Haha. I'm not above doing a wagon - but I agree, different name.

As far as size, I actually barely touched the Challenger - just removed the ledges out front and out back. Front, I just slid the top molded part forward and that's pretty much it. Also, if someone had to sit in the backseat, I figure there would be the same headroom as the Challenger.

Attached File(s)


This post has been edited by plum500: 29 January 2008 - 10:33 AM

0

#6 Guest_plum500_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 29 January 2008 - 10:51 AM

Tried a different pillar approach, but I have a feeling, regardless of the huge differences in style from the ground up, it would quickly be acused of being too close to something else....

Attached File(s)


0

#7 User is offline   burningman 

  • Moderately New
  • Pip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 36
  • Joined: 03-June 04

Posted 29 January 2008 - 11:24 AM

I like it man..reminds me of my GTX ;)
Great work!

I so feel your pain about the being accused of looking like something else. <_<

This post has been edited by burningman: 29 January 2008 - 11:26 AM

0

#8 User is offline   scatpackmopar 

  • Active
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 450
  • Joined: 10-October 04
  • Location:Florida/North Carolina

Posted 29 January 2008 - 08:34 PM

The first one looked more like a Duster than a Charger in my opinion. I really liked the second one that you posted. I bet that would even look good on the 4 door with the classic coke bottle Charger sides.
0

#9 User is offline   CherokeeVision 

  • Unusually Active
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 1,353
  • Joined: 09-December 04

Posted 29 January 2008 - 09:31 PM

View Postplum500, on Jan 29 2008, 08:32 AM, said:

Thanks. I might see if I can tweak that front some, but I'm actually kinda happy with it. When you say more 3rd gen, do you mean the top curve of the fender, overall shape, or length?


Mainly length. I've been a frequent critic of the too short front overhang on the LX's. Yours looks much better than the LX. There is just something about the overall look of a Charger that makes me want more length in front of the front wheels. Which is funny because my first car was a '65 Impala and there isn't much length in front of the front wheels on them. They had the length behind the rear seat.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic



Allpar Home · Cars · Engines · Repairs · People · Car Reviews · News · Videos

Please read the terms of use. We are not affiliated with Chrysler, LLC, makers of cars, minivans, trucks, and Mopar parts. We make no guarantees regarding validity or applicability of information, opinions, or advice. Posts may be edited and used in other parts of allpar.com and affiliated Mopar-related sites. We have the right to remove or modify any message, or ban or suspend any user without notice. Logos and site-specific information copyright © 2001-2009 Allpar LLC; Chrysler car PR materials remain property of Chrysler, LLC.