Jump to content

Welcome to Allpar Forums for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Plymouth, and more

Welcome to Allpar Forums for Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Plymouth, and more, like most online communities you must register to post in our community (and to view some of the forums), but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Add events to our community calendar
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message © 2009 DevFuse

News Forum Rules

For news and rumors (not op-ed pieces) related to Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep vehicles, and other automakers where relevant to Chrysler.

Please do not post large sections of news stories and other copyrighted material from other sites - post a link to the site (just put their URL on a separate line) - respect their intellectual property!

Key links: Upcoming Vehicles - How sales figures are calculated - Flex manufacturing - Latest news - Fuel discussions
Threads moved to the wiki: Future Models List - Current and Future Platform Codes - Transmissions

Register and log in now! Then you can avoid seeing all these ads!

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009 Dodge Ram Truck Of The Year Truckin Mag Rate Topic: -----

#1 Guest_tundrakiller_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 December 2008 - 02:23 PM

If you were a registered user, you would not be seeing this!

In volume35 truckin mag the ram beat out the titan,tundra,gmc,09f150......here is the (DYNO) for the ram 301hp/307tq the tundra had 300hp/326tq 09f150 270hp/299tq,titan 271hp/331tq,gmc sierra 265hp/296tq...the 08 hemi dyno was 247hp247tq.
0

#2 User is offline   CEO 

  • Now with 60% Warning Level!
  • PipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 168
  • Joined: 24-May 03
  • Location:.

Posted 21 December 2008 - 07:12 PM

View Posttundrakiller, on Dec 21 2008, 03:23 PM, said:

In volume35 truckin mag the ram beat out the titan,tundra,gmc,09f150......here is the (DYNO) for the ram 301hp/307tq the tundra had 300hp/326tq 09f150 270hp/299tq,titan 271hp/331tq,gmc sierra 265hp/296tq...the 08 hemi dyno was 247hp247tq.


so the tundra and the titan have more torque to the wheels? is that just better transmissions?
0

#3 User is offline   dakrt99 

  • Normal
  • PipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 05-January 05

Posted 21 December 2008 - 08:20 PM

What? Lets see here, the Ram loses 100lbs of torque? The HP looks real good though.
0

#4 User is offline   Dan the Man 

  • Normal
  • PipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 57
  • Joined: 22-March 06

Posted 21 December 2008 - 11:49 PM

Could it have something to do with the RAMs 20 wheels. I always see them test the RAMs in the 20w and the truck is being compared 2 is sporting 17s. Less rotating mass = more to the ground.Its always made out with ram this way for some reason .....
0

#5 User is offline   dakotaquadsport 

  • Active
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 466
  • Joined: 28-October 04

Posted 22 December 2008 - 10:57 AM

View PostDan the Man, on Dec 21 2008, 10:49 PM, said:

Could it have something to do with the RAMs 20 wheels. I always see them test the RAMs in the 20w and the truck is being compared 2 is sporting 17s. Less rotating mass = more to the ground.Its always made out with ram this way for some reason .....


It's typically the vehicle that's supplied from the manufacturer. I would also say that the 20's would affect 0-60 time, not HP/Torque numbers being put down to the rear wheels on a dyno.
0

#6 User is offline   kzooman83 

  • Normal
  • PipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 119
  • Joined: 06-February 05
  • Location:Kalamazoo, MI

Posted 23 December 2008 - 09:13 AM

Well, 307 lbs/ft to the wheels indicate about a 24% parasitic power loss between the engine and the rear wheels; it was my understanding that this is reasonable from a heavy duty automatic transmission. Did this particular truck have the auto or the manual?

This post has been edited by kzooman83: 24 December 2008 - 04:34 PM

0

#7 User is offline   dana44 

  • Lives Here
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Active Member
  • Posts: 9,252
  • Joined: 17-June 02
  • Location:National City, CA

Posted 23 December 2008 - 11:44 AM

I would figure out where the torque was going and fix it. It could be the tranny, they have been known to be inefficient in the past, might be a biggie. Going into the engine, the cam specs themselves, which I have only seen on the previous 5.7, but it is a big cam. It has good lift and as wide a duration possible. My major disagreements with the cam design (roller cams are nice), the lift is fine, the duration is about 10 degrees too much on the intake side, which doesn't really improve the rpm range because the lift is so high. Also, the sparkplug area inside the combustion chamber is really messed up. Dual plugs and the flame is directed towards each other, which is good, but there is a blank spot on both sides that is wasted. In fact, there is a way to easily improve the swirl burn pattern that would be good for.....time to find a Hemi and do some testing, thinking efficiency here, looking at a 20percent improvement....and they don't even see it B).
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic



Allpar Home · Cars · Engines · Repairs · People · Car Reviews · News · Videos

Please read the terms of use. We are not affiliated with Chrysler, LLC, makers of cars, minivans, trucks, and Mopar parts. We make no guarantees regarding validity or applicability of information, opinions, or advice. Posts may be edited and used in other parts of allpar.com and affiliated Mopar-related sites. We have the right to remove or modify any message, or ban or suspend any user without notice. Logos and site-specific information copyright © 2001-2009 Allpar LLC; Chrysler car PR materials remain property of Chrysler, LLC.