Welcome to Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Plymouth, and related cars and trucks
![]() |
Welcome to the Allpar forums for Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep, Plymouth, and other Mopar owners! You must register to post, but this is a simple, free process. Register now or sign in!
|
relay question
#1
Posted January 30, 2012 at 08:29 pm
#2
Posted January 30, 2012 at 08:44 pm
#3
Posted January 30, 2012 at 09:04 pm
#4
Posted January 30, 2012 at 09:16 pm
Edited by soloflite, January 30, 2012 at 09:17 pm.
#5
Posted January 30, 2012 at 09:45 pm
#6
Posted January 31, 2012 at 07:12 am
#7
Posted January 31, 2012 at 09:08 am
#8
Posted January 31, 2012 at 09:28 am
Bob ONeill, on January 31, 2012 at 09:08 am, said:
A lot of these bulbs have dual filaments inside the glass. i.e. tail light, brake light, and turn signal.
I believe the hazzard flasher operates the filament for the brake lights. The turn signal uses a different filament within the same bulb IIRC.
Poor grounding is also a cause for the turn signal to not operate (i.e. steady light but at a slightly dimmer output). The OEM flasher is a thermal flasher that requires the full current that passes through all the associated bulbs before it will start its break/make contacts to operate (flash).
Of course..... a bad flasher is always a possibility, but not usually the problem.
#9
Posted January 31, 2012 at 10:34 am
#10
Posted January 31, 2012 at 12:34 pm
I found thisout when mine failed.
I had one that was the wrong speed in my last Daytona.
It flashed real fast. I liked it.
maybe I'll pull it and put it in my current car.
#11
Posted January 31, 2012 at 03:19 pm
#12
Posted January 31, 2012 at 09:01 pm
#13
Posted January 31, 2012 at 11:37 pm
#14
Posted February 2, 2012 at 05:58 am
#15
Posted February 2, 2012 at 09:26 am
george w, on February 2, 2012 at 05:58 am, said:
Where do the brake lights fit in? I think on these cars, You can have a turn signal flashing with the brake lights on, but the hazzards quit flashing with the brake pedal pushed.
I remember on some old Fords, the turn signal being on defeated one of the brake lights and if you were behind someone who was pumping their brakes with a turn signal on, you would see a flash from the right and then a flash from the left. You had no idea of where they were going.
Not exactly one of Ford's 'better ideas' .
I could swear on some cars that I had, a seperate 1156 bulb was used for the parking/running lights, and the 1157 dual filiment was configured for: 1 filiment for the brake light & hazzard flasher, and the other filiment for the turn signal. I'll have to check the older books, and I could be wrong, or perhaps they changed the design. Certainly today's cars have turn signal lights that are much brighter than older cars. (sometimes too bright for my eyes).
#16
Posted February 2, 2012 at 06:59 pm
#17
Posted February 4, 2012 at 08:34 am
On the 89 with the "all red" tailights the brake light circuit passes through the turn signal switch and is interrupted by the turn signal flasher and the emergency flasher switch circuits. Not so on the 94 where the turn signal and emergency flashers are independent of the brake light circuits.
The wiring gets a little complicated as the front parking lights / turn signals are also involved but bypass the brake light switch.
Home · Cars · Engines · Repairs · People Car Reviews · News · |
|


hello





