Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep news from Allpar

Is Dodge dying?

News Analysis

Recently, Ward’s posted an article which was picked up (and exaggerated) by various news-scavenger sites. Insiders told Ward’s that two cars being rebranded from Dodge to something else, and the Avenger being dropped. The conclusion some drew: Dodge is dying.

graveWhen Sergio Marchionne started talking about the Dodge Avenger, over a year ago, it prompted death-of-Dodge stories then; but then, we’ve been reading death-of-Dodge stories since Daimler took over.

First, let’s look at Dodge Avenger. A rear wheel drive mid-sized car  is in the works; Chrysler/Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne publicly said more than once that it would not be economical to create one for Alfa Romeo alone, but making one for both Alfa and Dodge would work.

Not Chrysler. Dodge.

Does it make sense to make a Dodge version of the 200, which is  essentially a bigger Dart with a V6?  Chrysler’s division of sales among two or three brands makes it hard to make the top sales lists and increases costs and customer confusion. Having two midsize car means splitting the sales, unless they push the Chrysler brand upscale, which we’ve been told isn’t going to happen.

On the other hand, a rear wheel drive midsized Dodge Avenger (or Demon, or Daytona, or Magnum, or Shadow, or Lancer, or Rebel, or whatever) would make plenty of sense. It would give Alfa a credible car in the thick of its market, and give Dodge and SRT a more direct competitor for Camaro and Mustang, while improving Dodge’s image.

When Fiat took over, leaders said that Dodge would stay sporty, but would move from muscle to cornering. Dodge Dart sales invalidated that idea; Dart is a great handling car, but changing a brand in that radical yet subtle a way takes a lot of time and money. Instead, known fast-learner Sergio may be revising his plan from “change perceptions of Dodge” to the “change Dodge itself.”

Instead of being the everybrand and fighting with Chrysler to fit into Plymouth’s shoes, Dodge could expand on the work done by Charger and Challenger and Viper and, yes, Dodge Ram — even if the Viper stays within SRT and Ram stays off on its own. (I would argue that it’s time to bring SRT back down from full brand-hood, at least for Dodge.)

How many cars does a brand need? Dodge has Dart, Avenger, Journey, Challenger, Charger, and Caravan. Chrysler, which nobody is predicting the death of, only has 200, 300, and Town & Country. Dodge could easily lose two cars and remain viable.

The argument that Chrysler has too many brands would be tenable if Sergio hadn’t approved the full-brandhood of SRT, Mopar, and Ram. It doesn’t sound like he has a problem with “too many brands.”

There are some tough decisions in this strategy.  Making Dodge muscle only — rear drive Avenger, Challenger, Charger, and maybe the 2.4 Dart, with the other variants going over to Chrysler — leaves the question of the high-selling Journey and Caravan. Perhaps take Journey and jazz it up with a standard 3.2 V6 and nine-speed automatic, — a larger, less off-road-capable version of Cherokee — oh, right, that’s the plan anyway. Then take Caravan and make it more rough-and-tough, somehow, while keeping a Chrysler minivan for traditional buyers. Caravan hasn’t been doing all that well in the US retail market anyway.

Focusing Dodge on American-style performance would require the loss of some existing nameplates; and since there is no rear wheel drive midsize car available now, dropping Avenger for a while makes sense. Why confuse the market first by having two nearly identical midsize cars, then by switching one to rear wheel drive? Better to wait, have the gap, and, when perceptions of the current Avenger have grown fuzzy, then relaunch it with a brand new car.

In short — is Dodge dying? I highly doubt it. It remains important to Chrysler, and it has a distinct image, even if it’s not an image that’s of any use in selling Darts. If Chrysler decides to work with that image, instead of against it, they will have a winner on their hands — except when we have an active gas crisis.

See our full Dodge page.


Steckly scores in National 250


Three-time series champion Scott Steckly earned his first win of the 2014 NASCAR Canadian Tire Series season Saturday in the National 250 at the Autodrome St. Eustache in St. Eustache, Quebec. Starting from the No. 2 spot, Steckly dominated the race in the No. 22 Canadian Tire/Sylvania Dodge, leading for 202 of the 250 laps and beating Alex Guenette and the No....

Vipers victorious at the Brickyard


Jonathan Bomarito and Kumo Wittmer participated in the traditional kissing of the bricks after winning the GT Le Mans class in Friday’s Brickyard Grand Prix at Indianapolis Motor Speedway. This is the first Viper win of the 2014 IMSA TUDOR United SportsCar Championship season and it’s a major win for SRT Motorsports....

Friday racing results


Austin Wayne Self, driving the No. 22 AM Technical Solutions Dodge, finished second in the Scott Get Geared Up 200 presented by Federated Car Care that ran late Friday at the Lucas Oil Raceway in Brownsburg Indiana, just outside of Indianapolis. He crossed the finish line 5.378 seconds after Brandon Jones in the No....

Ram 1500 weight close to 2015 Ford?


Ram spokesman Nick Cappa wrote, We have received inquiries on weight reduction regarding half-ton trucks and a 2014 vs 2015 weight comparison from one of our competitors. … The 2014 Ram 1500 uses aluminum in strategic locations including the hood, suspension components, engine components and drive shaft. The more interesting story is our apples to apples weight numbers....

Categories: Chrysler.

Coughlin clinches Countdown berth
Johnson Clinches Countdown berth in Sonoma
Steckly scores in National 250
Vipers victorious at the Brickyard

Chrysler Cars at Allpar

Recent Chrysler News

Please read the terms of use! Information is presented to the best of our knowledge. Plans change and sometimes mistakes are made. Any decisions or purchases made based on this site's verbiage or images are done at the reader's own risk. * Mopar, Dodge, Jeep, Chrysler, HEMI, and certain other names are trademarks of Chrysler, LLC. We are not Chrysler. We are not responsible for the consequences of actions taken based on this site and make no guarantees regarding validity or applicability of information or advice. The Webmaster is not an expert. Copyright © 1998-2000, David Zatz; copyright © 2001-2013, Allpar LLC. All rights reserved.