Archive for the 'Executives' Category
Posted on February 7th, 2012 • by David Zatz
Retired Chrysler engineering chief Robert M. Sinclair died on January 13, 2012, at the age of 84. A graduate of the Chrysler Institute of Engineering, he was the father of three sons and grandfather of six children. No services were planned, and relatives requested that memorial contributions be sent to the American Cancer Society.

One of Robert M. Sinclair’s greatest achievements was leading engineering of the original, groundbreaking Chrysler Valiant, launched as a 1960 model. The car was priced close to GM and Ford compacts, but easily outhandled and outran them, with apparently greater reliability. The Valiant was Chrysler’s main export for many years, and Chrysler’s car with the greatest market share by a good margin throughout its life. (In 1959, Sinclair himself reported on Valiant engineering and the reasons for their decisions.)
Sinclair was Technical Director of Chrysler France in the mid-1960s. Burton Bouwkamp wrote, “That’s worthy of note because his engineers developed the FWD Simca 1100, which became the platform for the European C2 (1978) and C6 (1976) models. It was an outstanding platform for ride and handling but it was not used on the USA L Body [Omni/Horizon] because it was judged to be too expensive for a USA sub-compact car.”

Robert Sinclair was also the project manager responsible for bringing out the subcompact
Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon, which was created using engineers and stylists from the U.S., France, and Britain.
In 1983, Sinclair was Chrysler Director of Power Train Engineering; he led the creation of the “Peugeot” (SIMCA) 1.6 liter engine used in some Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon models (which launched in the US with a Volkswagen 1.7), as well as Europe’s C2 and C6.
By 1984 he was vice president of engineering for Chrysler Corporation. In 1985, he launched the Turbo III project which set in motion Chrysler’s first dual overhead cam and four-valve-per-cylinder engine, which produced 225 horsepower from a 2.2 liter engine. It also had distributorless ignition. (He also signed a contract with Lotus to develop a 2.5 liter, naturally aspirated 16-valve four, and a four wheel drive system for the Daytona; neither of these survived, due to budget constraints).
Robert Sinclair retired on February 1, 1987, after 37 years at the company. Lee Iacocca wrote, “During Bob’s nearly four decades at Chrysler, he has made significant contributions to the turnaround and success of the company, contributions that will take the company well into the 1990s and beyond. His role in front-wheel-drive technology, turbocharging and unibody construction are among his many accomplishments during a distinguished career.”
In 1988, he wrote an article for Popular Mechanics in which he said that by 2005, the piston engine would remain, but companies would “deliver superb reliability, pleasint driving, and at a price that makes sense… an engine that starts instantly every morning at any temperature and any altitude.” He talked about reliability and “we have to get rid of leaks, with new gaskets. It is not romantic, but that is where the advances are.”
Sinclair noted that turbocharging would be refined, and adaptive suspensions would be coming, along with sport-vs-comfort switches, voice commands, and controls on or close to the steering wheel; he also thought round dial gauges would remain, in black and white, with red needles. His predictions were remarkably accurate, including the arrival of drive-by-wire (though he firmly objected to it).
Allpar will be posting a more complete page on Robert Sinclair later this week.
(Thanks, Bob Lees, for the notice.)
•
Like on Facebook •
Posted on February 6th, 2012 • by Bill Cawthon
Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne joined WJR-AM radio’s Paul W. Smith this morning to discuss the two-minute spot that aired during the halftime of Super Bowl XLVI last night. What follows is a transcript of that show:
Paul W. Smith: Well, “You Can Drive My Car” the Beatles always starting our 7 o’clock hour, but how appropriate and our guest would certainly suggest you can drive his car and his car will be a fine Chrysler product; could be a Fiat, could be – well, I’ll let him say. I’m not sure what he’s driving these days but it’s always a pleasure to speak with the CEO of Fiat, SPA; chairman of the board and CEO of Chrysler Group, LLC, of course, Sergio Marchionne coming off an unbelievable victory last night at the Super Bowl. Sergio, congratulations.
Sergio Marchionne: Thanks, Paul. It was a great day yesterday.
Paul W. Smith: Well, let me tell you something, you got the New York Post saying, “Clint Eastwood scored one of the few touchdowns in last night’s advertising Super Bowl; a stirring endorsement of Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep and Motown as a whole, standing out in what was a decidedly ho-hum night for Madison Avenue,” just as the start of the third quarter there was Clint Eastwood. CNN Money, “Chrysler is king of the Super Bowl spots.” They proclaim in one of these stories that Chrysler just won the Super Bowl. It goes on and on; of course our Detroit papers being very favorable about it, too; and everybody was wondering what in the world you could do following Eminem from last year, and you even said to us, you know, understand we’re not going to be able to duplicate what we did. Well, you didn’t duplicate it, you’ve certainly – you may have outdone it in terms of spreading that whole feeling now for the whole country.
Sergio Marchionne: No, I don’t know whether we outdid Eminem. It’s difficult. The message is completely different this time around. It’s very difficult when you work on these things to be objective because the message and the work that we did with Clint Eastwood and with the agency and with our people on this was so, so detailed and so gut-wrenching that it was very difficult to be objective. So I – the fact that…
Paul W. Smith: You’ve got a nice team of young guys that worked on this; young men and women that worked on this.
Sergio Marchionne: Yeah, and by the way, there are two people that should be singled out; one of them is Olivier Francois, who’s the head of marketing for both Fiat and Chrysler, and Saad Chehab who’s the head of Chrysler-Lancia and these two guys have just – they’ve done an outstanding job. They didn’t sleep for – and I can tell you because they were with me in Europe when we were finalizing these commercials — but they did not sleep for four days in a row, and we didn’t wrap this up until last Monday at Noon.
Paul W. Smith: Wow.
Sergio Marchionne: So when we made the final call on the musical score, which by the way is a story in and of itself because there was a young lady out of Oregon who wrote the score and was recorded with people from the Oregon Symphony Orchestra in a matter of three days; and she’s a 35-year-old kid out of nowhere who’s done this brilliant job of recording the music. So it was a magical thing that came together and I’m thankful to everybody who worked on this; and it’s a great tribute to the people at Chrysler. The commercial ultimately reflects the spirit that drives this organization and I’m delighted.
Paul W. Smith: In the spirit of the workers who, from top to bottom, helped Chrysler post a $225 million fourth quarter profit, the hourly workers getting profit sharing checks for the first time since 2005; and I know that as is the case always in a situation like this, this is really just the beginning; no time to relax; this is the time to really charge forward, Sergio.
Sergio Marchionne: Yeah, no I think I reminded our dealers yesterday in Vegas when I met them yesterday morning that we’ve got a daunting task ahead of us for 2012 and that it should not be underestimated, the competition is incredibly fierce. I think we need to stay humble, keep our head down and just keep on pushing as I’ve always said, but we’re walking into 2012 with good prospects. January was a good month and I think this commercial yesterday has reset the tone of a fighting spirit within Chrysler and that’s the way I’d like to look at the rest of the year, and we’ll see. I’m confident.
Paul W. Smith: Well, it was – by the way, he won’t tell you this so I’ll tell you that when Sergio Marchionne was talking to all of the dealers at the NADA – not just Chrysler dealers but all dealers there, a tough crowd in Vegas, you got five standing ovations with what you said. So what you said resonated as well with the dealers as this commercial resonated with the viewers last night at the Super Bowl.
Sergio Marchionne: Yeah, no, but it says something about this country, Paul; I mean it says something about the resilience of what America really – I think Americans unfortunately have got this bad habit of short-selling themselves internationally. I travel the world and I can tell you, Americans should be incredibly proud of what they have. I’ve had a chance to see firsthand how other places work and how they view life and I think that the fundamental values that drive this country are sacred and I think they should be protected at all costs because they’re what makes this place magic and we should not fool around with them. I think this is important stuff and we need to protect it.
Paul W. Smith: Well, and it seems, Sergio Marchionne, that we from time to time need a reminder from somebody who was not born in this country who spends a lot of time in other countries. We sometimes need a reminder. I’m not exactly sure why, but I’m glad you’ve reminded us, and certainly Clint Eastwood reminded us in many ways with what he said.
Sergio Marchionne: Yeah, no he’s a unique human being…
Paul W. Smith: How did you talk – Clint Eastwood doesn’t do commercials. How did you talk Clint Eastwood into doing your Chrysler commercial?
Sergio Marchionne: Simply because I think – I actually believed – he believes in what he says. He’s at a point in his life where he doesn’t have to prove anything to anybody. You know, the great thing about being 81 years old is that you’ve got standing and you’ve got stature. If anything at all, age gives it to you, but in his case it’s his career and what he’s been able to accomplish, and he felt really deeply everything he said. I’ve spoken to him. There was not a single doubt in my mind that when he spoke on the commercial he was expressing his views. You know, when he talks about the second half and you talk about somebody who’s – and God forbid that anything happens to him — but the second half is going to go longer than his runway as it’s hopefully going to go longer than mine, and for somebody to be able to speak about the future with a level of confidence that he spoke about yesterday, and with I guess a sense of serenity and peace about dealing with the second half, is something that we should all take to heart. It’s – these are unique moments, right. You can’t really – you can’t minimize them. I think they’re worth a lot; they’re going to stay with me for a long period of time because even the making of the commercial changed us, right. It changed us as human beings and so we’ll cherish it for a long, long time.
Paul W. Smith: Sergio Marchionne was watching this. I don’t know if you could be anonymous in a sports bar in Clarkston with Gualberto Ranieri, the man who’s always with you and doing a nice job for you, and I was on the phone with you right after and found that the commercial got a standing O in the sports bar.
Sergio Marchionne: It did, it did, and I think it brought a huge amount of pride back from Detroiters and I think for – it’s nice to see, and I think – and I hate to say this, but we probably deserve it after all the stuff that we’ve gone through, so.
Paul W. Smith: I think you’re right, and I think that the people across the country could relate to the fact that we can’t be knocked out with one punch. We do get right back up again and –
Sergio Marchionne: Yep.
Paul W. Smith: And the world is going to hear the roar of our engines. It may be halftime in America but our second half is about to begin and we’re very thrilled with the direction it is going right now. You meant in no way shape or form, and unfortunately with it being the silly season in politics, everything has some political bent to it but this did not.
Sergio Marchionne: It has zero political content. I think we need to be careful, and God knows, I mean I can’t stop anybody from associating themselves with a message, but it was not intended to be any type of political overture on our part. We are as apolitical as you can make us. You know, we’re just an ingredient of a big machine here in this country that makes us go on. I wasn’t expressing a view and certainly nobody inside Chrysler was attempting to influence decisions. The message is sufficiently universal and neutral that it should be appealing to everybody in this country and I sincerely hope that it doesn’t get utilized as political fodder in a debate. But you know.
Paul W. Smith: You know, it’s interesting, too, with we already know you had to spend a lot of money to get that time, two minutes at that prime time just before the start of the third quarter. It probably was relatively expensive. I’m not asking, but relatively expensive to get Clint Eastwood.
Sergio Marchionne: Yes but you’ll see this; we’ll probably issue a press release in connection with this. Clint was sufficiently – was so generous in his approach to this that any money that we’re paying him is going to go to charity. So this was not done for financial reasons.
Paul W. Smith: It really seemed like it was coming from his heart and I point this out only because it’s astounding to me because I didn’t think about it ‘til I read it from somewhere; here you have this two-minute incredible commercial with the incomparable 81-year-old director/actor/producer Clint Eastwood speaking right to us, speaking to the heart of the nation, and he not once uttered the word Chrysler.
Sergio Marchionne: Yeah, didn’t have to I don’t think.
Paul W. Smith: Nope, he sure didn’t have to but it’s astounding when I look back and think back. He didn’t have to and that says a lot for what you guys are doing and the way that commercial came through. Again congratulations. What a fabulous moment for Chrysler again and the hard-working men and women who have been through hell and back and continue to keep doing a great job. I don’t want to forget, too, very quickly and then I’ll let you go, Sergio Marchionne, but that was a funny and powerful Fiat commercial you had, too.
Sergio Marchionne: You enjoyed it, huh?
Paul W. Smith: I did! I thought it was funny. I didn’t know where it was going.
Sergio Marchionne: Yeah, but it tells you something about this house. We are multifaceted (laughs).
Paul W. Smith: (Laughs) Yes.
Sergio Marchionne: And multi-talented, too, I think.
Paul W. Smith: Multifaceted, multi-talented, but I can’t remember, that’s a hot little Fiat. What was the model number or model?
Sergio Marchionne: It was the Fiat 500 Abarth, which is going to go into production now. It’ll be available in dealers I think in the first quarter of this year so it’s –
Paul W. Smith: Talk about a pocket rocket. That thing looked hot.
Sergio Marchionne: Yeah, it’s a rock and roll car.
Paul W. Smith: Yeah. All right, Sergio, always a pleasure. Thanks for your support here. We’ll see you from the Geneva Motor Show. We’ll look forward to that, and congratulations on what’s happening, too, with MOPAR and the 75th anniversary of the aftermarket parts division. You’re turning out some incredible, souped-up, customized cars. I think that’s a smart move for people who want to buy cars and customize them right away; you’re doing it with MOPAR. And again congratulations on winning the Super Bowl ad game, if you will, in a big, big way.
Sergio Marchionne: Thanks very much, Paul. Talk to you soon.
Paul W. Smith: All right, we’ll look forward to it. The CEO of Fiat SPA, chairman of the board and CEO of Chrysler Group LLC, Sergio Marchionne. And boy, he has lots to be happy about and lots to be proud of as to all of the hard-working men and women of Chrysler. And the people involved in putting that thing together did a heck of a job.
Transcript provided by Chrysler Media.
•
Like on Facebook • Tags:
Chrysler,
Paul W. Smith,
Sergio Marchionne,
WJR-AM.
Posted on February 6th, 2012 • by Bill Cawthon
Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne spoke to dealers at the NADA convention on Saturday. The following is a transcript of his remarks”
Thank you, Stephen, for those welcoming remarks. And I also want to say “thank you” to Governor Brian Sandoval for honoring us with your presence today.
Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon.
I have to start off my remarks today with a confession. I am almost embarrassed to admit that although I have spent most of my professional life travelling around the world, I have never, ever been to Las Vegas.
I am a Nevada novice, although this city has been immortalized in enough movies I have seen to make the place almost familiar to me. And so I am delighted to be here today, to experience the Vegas charm first hand, and it is indeed a privilege for me to have the chance to speak before the members of NADA, an association that traces its history back to 1917, when 30 auto dealers went to Washington to protest a luxury tax on automobiles.
The city of Las Vegas was only 12 years old back then, and it was hardly a convention center. Las Vegas was more of a watering stop for steam-driven trains traveling between Salt Lake City and Los Angeles. Early residents battled heat, desolation and dust. There were more tumbleweeds than automobiles.
In fact, one of those pioneer settlers, watching tumbleweeds blow first one way, and then the other, back and forth on unpaved Fremont Street, originally uttered the remark: “What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.”
This remained a small, out-of-the-way town until after the Second World War, when the city began what civic boosters refer to as its “colorful” period of history.
“Colorful” being a euphemism for “shady,” as it was largely mob money that built the city into a tourist attraction. One of those colorful characters, named Bugsy Siegel, opened the Flamingo Hotel and Casino in 1946 with $6 million in mob funding. Unfortunately for Bugsy, the Flamingo originally suffered heavy losses. He was soon gunned down, a slaying said to have been ordered by his mob investors in order to bring in someone else to run operations at the Flamingo.
Fortunately, today we live in an era when most boards of directors use more humane methods to bring about a change in management. At least that was true up to the time of the financial crisis of 2008, when board room behavior became somewhat heavy handed. Not Bugsy style, but close.
Eventually, legitimate corporate entities replaced mob ownership in Las Vegas.
I’m sure Governor Sandoval is proud that today’s Vegas is the country’s entertainment mecca, the convention capital of the world and the ultimate symbol of the belief that, “if you build it, they will come.”
From their origins, NADA and Las Vegas have both grown up into something much larger, and an integral part of the American experience.
Of course, this city is also famous for its gaming tables. And during the recent recession, some of you may have wondered if you would be better off investing at the roulette wheel than putting your money back into the struggling auto industry.
In all honesty, those thoughts may have occurred more often to the Chrysler dealers in the room than the rest of you.
Betting on the underdog was not an easy call. Yet last year, Chrysler led the industry with a 26 percent increase in U.S. sales, and gained more market share than any other major manufacturer. Just three days ago, we released our 2011 financial results, which showed we made $2 billion in modified operating profit and shipped two million cars worldwide, a 26 percent increase from 2010.
We have been receiving accolades in the press for this comeback, but the truth is that Chrysler itself didn’t sell a single car to consumers.
It was Chrysler dealers who moved the metal, one vehicle at a time.
In fact, their sales, our retail sales, increased 43 percent last year and I want to express my deep appreciation to each and everyone of our own dealers who hung tough through hard times and uncertainty and who played a huge part in helping us reconnect with our customers.
As a dealer, whether you represent Chrysler or one or more of our worthy competitors, you are in fact much more than just an intermediary that connects manufacturers with their ultimate customers.
You are chief executives of your own independent businesses. You and I share more than just the title. You make investments, risk capital, make decisions that affect the lives of employees, and often stay up late at night worrying about how it is all going to turn out.
Right now, judging from what we are hearing from many of you, things are looking up. There is a feeling of optimism around the entire industry that perhaps has not been present since the Nineties.
There is a certain swagger in town this weekend, the kind last seen in Las Vegas during the heyday of Sinatra and the rest of the “Rat Pack.” This high level of enthusiasm also was apparent a few weeks ago at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. And the enthusiasm spread even beyond the Chrysler stand, where we brought out an important new car, the Dodge Dart.
All of the domestic automakers, and many others as well, launched significant new products. The introduction of so many new entries demonstrated again how incredibly competitive the U.S. market really is.
Tomorrow, if you tune in to the Super Bowl on NBC, you will see another example of an industry fighting to bring the American consumer into the fold as the market comes back.
Chrysler will be back in the game as an advertiser, although I confess it will be improbable if not impossible to replicate the success of the two-minute, “Born of Fire” commercial that we aired last year. That commercial, featuring Eminem, was a calculated, all-or-nothing risk that was enthusiastically received during the game and has surpassed 21 million views on YouTube, as well as being named the best automotive commercial in the world at the Cannes International Advertising Festival in France.
I don’t want to give away too much about the commercial we will air tomorrow, but I will tell you that it will once again be unconventional. It will reflect the very spirit of what Chrysler is today, how we view our role in society, our passion and our love for this country.
Perhaps our success last year has inspired some others to try their hand at Super Bowl advertising.
After all, as this British sign clearly shows, it is hard to keep a good thing secret for long.
According to published reports, there will be a large roster of car commercials in the game, which some people also refer to as the “Super Bowl of Advertising” because it provides a huge audience that actually looks forward to seeing the ads. In fact, MSNBC reported that at least nine other competitors will air advertising, despite the hefty cost of doing so.
With that many automakers willing to pay the hefty cost of Super Bowl commercials, this is clearly an industry feeling positive about 2012.
So whatever we’ve lived through in the past four years – some of you in purgatory, and some of us in hell – I think we’ve paid our penance.
And the prospects for this year are quite good.
After a series of false starts, the U.S. economy appears to be picking up steam, as evidenced by the 11 percent increase in auto industry sales in 2011 compared with 2010. This trend continued in January, with a very healthy SAAR of 14.1 million vehicles.
Consumer confidence is creeping up and the employment recovery is beginning to gain momentum. The jobs report that came out just yesterday showed the unemployment rate is at its lowest level in nearly three years, which shows more and more companies have confidence that demand will grow for their goods and services. There is even a glimmer of optimism in the long-dormant housing market.
A Polk report released just a few weeks ago showed that the average vehicle on American roads is now 10.8 years old. That is the oldest since tracking began in 1995, when the average was just 8.4 years, and it should indicate a reservoir of pent-up demand.
One area causing nervousness in markets around the world is the uncertainty of the situation in Europe, because of the sovereign debt crisis. The response to the current crisis will go a long way toward determining the future of the Union itself.
Europe ultimately needs to decide whether it wants a true European Union. A confederation of interests which is unified by one single currency doesn’t work. Europe needs to find a way, but more importantly the resolve, to collectively run a fiscal and economic policy.
The problem is of a magnitude and of a reach that could, if it’s not controlled, have ripple effects beyond the European borders.
I’m hopeful that all those involved will eventually converge on a solution, but at the same time it is an issue we are watching very carefully to understand the risks it poses to the market in general and the auto sector in particular.
Perhaps the most important question our industry will face in the next few years is whether or not we are capable of handling a newfound prosperity, in a way that does not jeopardize the future.
It has been reported, by those who pay attention to the way of birds, that a certain kind of lark sings the same five notes over and over. Day after day, year after year, the same tune. This propensity to repeat oneself endlessly reminds me of how the auto sector behaved before the last recession, dragging value-destroying business strategies behind us for years.
Like the five-note lark that can’t change its tune, our industry endured these structural flaws for decade after decade, through market upturns and downturns alike. These dubious practices included an irrational preservation of industrial inefficiencies coupled with brand-damaging marketing approaches. Our companies struggled to make a profit on the core business of building and selling cars, depending instead on related activities, such as financing.
Domestic automakers in particular made expensive ventures into non-automotive businesses, further distracting attention from the simple proposition of making automobiles that people wanted to buy. We forgot that product is the key, and everything else is nonsense in comparison. Customers live in their cars, and if you give them an experience that is less than satisfactory, they will go elsewhere.
The recession destroyed all of our excuses for inaction.
Under the leadership of President Obama, America had the courage to force a restructuring of the industry, ensuring that what emerged from the bankruptcy of two major U.S. manufacturers would provide the foundations on which a new process of growth and development could be built.
Overcapacity is no longer a NAFTA problem. We have taken every ounce of unnecessary capacity out of the system.
The Fiat-Chrysler partnership stemmed from this effort to address the industry’s structural obstacles. It is designed to create efficiencies in the use of production capacity and the development of products, while allowing us to focus more resources on innovation.
The partnership also is helping Chrysler broaden its product portfolio and add jobs right here in America. For example, earlier this week we announced that we will add more than 1,800 workers at our plant in Belvidere, Illinois, to assemble the new Dodge Dart, which is based on an Alfa Romeo European platform. We also have announced plans to start production of a Maserati SUV at our Jefferson Avenue North Assembly Plant in Detroit later this year. You will also see Alfa Romeo models built in the U.S. as part of our plan to reintroduce this iconic brand to this country beginning next year.
As a whole, the North American industry has been retooled so that it can sustain not only the normal down cycle, but even the sort of cataclysm that we recently underwent. It was a painful exercise, but restructuring set the base for the rebirth of the American car industry.
This rebuilding is not contingent on applying a few Band-Aids, but instead is being built on a solid foundation.I believe the traumatic times we went through have indelibly changed the DNA of all of us connected to the auto industry.
I don’t believe there is anyone in the room who doesn’t remember the pain and suffering we collectively endured. For our part at Chrysler, our leadership team is continuously mindful of the experience.
Some sense has been restored to the marketplace. We have not seen any of the destructive pricing policies that characterized the auto market for many years. Leaders are making decisions for the long run, and across the industry there seems to be an understanding that we cannot afford to destroy brand equities or pricing power.
The French philosopher Camus wrote, “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer.”
This is my hope – that having gone through our season of despair, that we are fully committed now to a path of viability.
The important thing is to maintain the discipline the restructuring forced. We need to be careful and avoid arrogance, resist the temptation to return to the car baron mentality, which has been a character trait for this industry for many years. Success is never permanent, it must be earned every day.
We have embraced change, but only if we embrace humility at the same time will we be in a position to reap the benefits of that change.
When the new Chrysler was formed nearly 3 years ago, one of our top priorities was to transform the relationship with our dealers by making it more transparent and emphasizing the partnership aspect of it.
I have often heard it said that the fate of dealers depends on the choices made by the manufacturers that they represent. This attitude is based on an assumption that an automaker drives the strategic direction and the ultimate financial prospects of its dealers. THis has an element of truth to it. There is no question that the products we build and ship to your stores are foundational for any success.
Chrysler’s revival in the marketplace was possible because we fulfilled a commitment to deliver 16 all-new or substantially refreshed products, including new powertrains, fresh designs and significantly upgraded interiors. We brought these 16 vehicles to market in a period of just 19 months, at competitive quality levels and with considerable marketing support.
But we recognize there is another side of the equation. The fact is that unilateral relationships do not exist.
Chrysler’s comeback was fueled by the commitment and the skills of the people that work inside Chrysler, and of equal importance, by the commitment and the skills of all the people who work with Chrysler. It is the same story for every manufacturer. Competitive dealers, those with courage and the vision to anticipate the needs of the market, not only write their own book of success, but also strengthen the brands and companies they represent.
I understand how important it is for dealers to know that their OEM partner is solid, resourceful and absolutely committed to following through in its partnerships. This is why transparency is a key element. Because our dealers are critical to our success, it is important that we share our objectives with them along with our plans for achieving those targets.
At Chrysler, we are making a great effort to keep the lines of communication fully open with dealers. Not just by holding dealer council meetings that include all of our senior management, as well as monthly conference calls. It also includes ongoing ad hoc discussions, so that we all are clear on exactly where everyone stands.
In a crowded market, customer satisfaction is a crucial differentiator for both manufacturers and dealers.
One of the most significant changes at the retail level in recent years is the unprecedented level of transparency in pricing. Educated consumers are using Internet-based services to get a pretty good idea of what they’re going to pay for a car. Price negotiating is being taken out of your hands, and it is a trend that will only continue as the consumer is able to access even more sophisticated information.
This makes it even more important for you to cultivate customer loyalty by providing the highest levels of care and convenience, or else risk being vulnerable to your competitors who are much more in tune with this development.
Customer satisfaction is the most significant determining factor of future prospects, for you and for us.
At Chrysler, we’re constantly looking for ways to improve the customer experience with our products and in our dealerships.
Overall, our dealers are more profitable than they have been in a decade. We know the importance of this. It is a prerequisite for you to invest in facilities, in hiring and training the best people, and in providing the amenities that round out a pleasant customer experience.
We need our brands to be properly represented in the marketplace, and this requires commitment and investments. At the same time, we recognize the need for some flexibility. We have to go beyond a system where the manufacturer issues top-down edicts to the distribution system. Facility requirements need to be reasonable, based on the economic realities of your particular marketplace.
Flexibility is an important aspect of embracing change. An example is our approach to our Dealer Standards program, which we continually assess to ensure we are on the right path. We made a lot of progress with this comprehensive program in the first phase after introduction, but recently customer satisfaction scores have plateaued.
As we examined the results, we concluded that our previous approach wasn’t elastic enough to accommodate individual dealer concerns.
We have suspended the rewards program and after consultation with our dealers intend to be back with a revised program.
The future of this industry is not without significant challenges.
One of the biggest hurdles facing our industry in the years ahead is improving fuel efficiency.
Over the long-term, we will need to bring our vehicle fleets to an average of 54.5 gallons by 2025, the anticipated federal standard that will be formally set later this year.
Looking at the near and medium term, I believe our industry still has a great deal of room for progress in the use of combustion technologies to bring about significant improvements in mileage in a cost-effective manner.
We don’t expect to turn America into a country full of people who drive subcompacts in order to reach fuel-economy targets.
The new Dodge Dart will represent a big step in fulfilling the commitment made by Fiat to help Chrysler introduce its fuel-efficient cars and engines to the North American market.
If you consider the C and D segments – respectively, the Dart and the Chrysler 200 segments – and you add in the SUVs associated with those segments, they account for more than half of the American market today.
That is not going to drastically change.
We need to get smarter about making these cars lighter, reducing friction losses, and improving transmissions and engines. Expertise in extracting more power out of smaller displacement engines is one of the things that Fiat has brought to Chrysler.
Although we have only skimmed the surface of our ability to squeeze out higher efficiency levels, it will not be possible to meet the tough 2025 EPA targets on the basis of pure combustion.
All the work going on now on electrification is a crucial part of exploration, and in fact at Chrysler we are working on an electric version of the Fiat 500 that we’ll begin manufacturing later this year.
But I don’t believe any of the current solutions are going to provide the final, definitive answer.
In my opinion, until the economic model that supports electrification changes, so that we can provide a cost-effective alternative to combustion, an outcome, by the way, which is far from being certain, electric vehicles will continue to play only a marginal part of the industry.
There is also an unresolved issue as to the future of compressed natural gas, CNG. Increased access to the natural gas reserves in the United States and Canada could help create independence from imported oil in a relatively short period of time in North America. It is also eco-friendly, with up to 25 percent fewer CO2 emissions compared with gasoline. And for customers, it provides a significant price advantage.
I was encouraged to hear President Obama say, in his recent State of the Union address, that he would focus on shale gas development as a way to create jobs, reduce emissions and lessen dependence on foreign energy sources.
Over the next several years our industry needs to continue to accumulate knowledge and increase our understanding of various technical solutions.
My best read of the future is that the ultimate answer to meeting 2025 standards will involve the use of multiple technologies.
I am confident that, if we unleash our engineering talent, we can achieve sustainable mobility without sacrificing our customers’ desire for vehicles that meet their transportation needs and are a pleasure to drive.
The history of our industry is marked by tremendous innovators who made a difference, fulfilling human aspirations for mobility and redefining how people lived. A defeatist outlook in regard to the fuel-economy challenge is not worthy of our collective heritage. As an industry, it is up to us to reject the notion that we can’t do it.
We can choose instead to embrace the attitude expressed by the author Thomas Carlyle, who said, “Every noble work is at first impossible.”
The focus on sustainable mobility is part of a broader issue – namely, our responsibility to our communities, our society and our planet.
At Fiat and Chrysler alike, we believe that economic success and respect for the environment are not mutually exclusive concepts.
Sustainable environmental practices, incorporated in both the products we sell as well as our production processes, are an important part of the effort to give merit and dignity to what we do.
We have established a sustainability team that is coordinating a disciplined approach and is reaching out to dealers and other members of the extended Chrysler family.
Some of our dealers already are well along the path.
For example, Tim Parker in Hot Springs, Arkansas, installed a 2,000-square-foot active solar panel system, the largest privately owned solar array in the entire state. It is part of a comprehensive effort by the dealership to reduce its carbon footprint and conserve natural resources.
Another dealership, Hunter’s in Lancaster, California, has implemented a recycling and energy efficiency program that includes solar carports that produce 75 percent of the dealership’s energy needs while providing protective covered parking for customers’ vehicles in the service lot.
I know there are many more dealers, and not just in the Chrysler fold, who serve society in a socially responsible way.
I do not pretend to have the answer to how any of you should conduct your businesses in a way that marks you as a good citizen. But I do urge you to make it part of your decision-making process.
Great organizations conduct business in accordance with fundamental values, and one of those values is a commitment to leave behind a world in which future generations can meet their own energy, transportation and health needs.
Hemingway once wrote: “Courage comes such a short distance; from the heart to the head; but when it goes, no one knows how far away it goes; and it is a bad thing to be in the bullfighting business when it is gone, no matter where it went.”
The challenges we face as an industry, and as a society, have much in common with a bullfight. If there is one ingredient that we need, it is courage. The kind of courage that comes from often choosing the grander, the more difficult path.
That courage is what must define us today.
Being courageous includes holding fast to those values that are at the core of how we do business and represent our most precious asset: honesty and integrity in our choices; humility and respect in our dealings with others; and the sense of responsibility held by those who fully understand that their actions have consequences far beyond the walls of the office or the dealership.
Being courageous means assuming the moral responsibility of our actions. We need to do something so that our age becomes an age of hope and action.
At the World Economic Forum last week in Davos, there was a renewed sense of urgency on how to adapt the market economy in a way that will moderate continual cycles of boom-and-bust, create jobs, and produce sustainable prosperity around the world.
There can be no doubt that the responsibility of governments is more crucial today than ever and that the decisions they make now will affect the legacy we leave for future generations.
But I believe that the crafting of our future should not be just the responsibility of governments. In its essence, it is an individual and collective responsibility. It is the duty of every person at every level.
Martin Luther King, Jr. – one of the most passionate leaders this world has ever seen – said, “I was not afraid of the words of the violent, but of the silence of the honest.”
The silence of those who choose inaction, who watch things happen and do nothing as if it isn’t their concern. The silence of those who shout and preach in public debates and on television, who act in their own self-interest and to bolster their own image, but then do nothing to actually change things.
That responsibility requires a commitment to being involved and taking action.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was talking about us all. He was addressing the human tendency to cocoon ourselves in our relative wellbeing, selfishness and indifference.
Closing our eyes, or thinking that the sacrifices and solutions are someone else’s responsibility, makes us part of the problem.
We all have a responsibility to make the most of the opportunities available to us now. We have a duty to commit to what we are able to do, to dedicate our individual skills and talents, to unite the best of society and work together to achieve higher objectives.
This is a lesson I have learned traveling and working around the world. A lesson I have carried with me that has allowed me to embrace my responsibilities as a leader with serenity and an open mind.
The essence of leadership, when all is said and done, is assumption of the moral duty to take an active part in building the future of the organization and of society as a whole. Acknowledging one’s own responsibility to give the next generation hope for a better future. Being accountable for this task is what makes leadership a privilege and a sacred trust.
Thank you all.
•
Like on Facebook • Tags:
NADA,
Sergio Marchionne,
speech.
Posted on January 11th, 2012 • by Bill Cawthon
Chrysler CEO sergio Marchionne spoke to the Automotive News World Congress in Detroit today. The speech, though long, is well worth consideration and reflection:
The first thing I want to do is add my condolences, both personally and on behalf of the whole of Fiat-Chrysler, to Susie Wheldon.
I know that all of us in this room share in the admiration for the skill, courage and passion that made Dan a champion. As deserving as the award you have just received may be, Susie, we join you in mourning this tragic loss.
And to you Keith (Crain, publisher of Automotive News),
I want to say thank you for the kind words you used in introducing me tonight, and for the invitation to be part of this World Congress.
Starting speeches in a setting like this is always difficult. Especially directed to an audience that has just enjoyed a full meal and three exhausting days at an incredibly successful Detroit Auto Show.
And it is especially difficult for me, having just finished the year with an inordinate number of awards and flattery directed at me as a person and to Chrysler for the execution of its turnaround plan in 2011.
And so, I have decided to open up with a parable, the kind of story that is a mixture of fiction and reality and that we use to learn life lessons and pass them on to future generations.
It is a story about husbandry, a noble profession devoted to the breeding of crops and animals.
In this profession, the terms service or servicing are used to refer to the act of procreation or copulation between animals. So, for example, when a stallion mates with a mare, it is said that the stallion services the mare.
This parable is a story about bulls and cows, and it starts with three bulls that are grazing in a vast expanse of the Canadian prairies. A young bull, a middle aged bull and a much older one.
All of a sudden the young bull notices a group of appealing, attractive cows at the bottom of the hill, and he turns to the other two and says, “Let us run down the hill and service all those cows.” The more experienced and sensible middle-aged bull answers, “Let us walk down and service a few.”
And the road-tested old bull tops it all off by saying, “If we hide in the tall grass, maybe they will not see us.”
The moral of this story is simple.
There are times when hiding in the tall grass is the most sensible posture to take, and 2012 for me is the year.
The string of achievements we at Chrysler pulled off in 2011 cannot be replicated and we should not suffer from any illusions that we can. Starting with the Imported from Detroit Super Bowl ad in February to the December sales close, with U.S. sales up 37% for the month and 26% for the whole of 2011, we hit a number of balls right out of the park.
This string cannot be replicated.
And so, in 2012, the marching orders are for all of us, to keep our heads down, stay humble and keep on pushing.
Any other posture carries with it the inherent risk that we will be the victims of a servicing act by our competitors. Not a pleasant prospect, at best.
As an aside, just to load you up with cocktail conversation material, you should know that financial institutions use the terms service or servicing to refer to their relationship with their clients.
Which finally explains the high degree of discomfort I have always felt after a meeting with bankers on Wall Street.
Also, Keith, I would be remiss if I didn’t thank you for your holiday present, even though I know in my heart that the fruitcake was re-gifted.
As I understand your theory, there are only six or seven fruitcakes that exist, and they keep getting passed around, since no one actually eats them and they are basically indestructible.
So I think I can accurately predict that you will get this fruitcake back at some future occasion.
Just remember one thing, Keith, it’s the thought that counts.
But now enough with levities.
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
I had the privilege to speak to the World Congress two years ago.
Some, not many, things have not changed since then.
For example, my wardrobe choice.
Aside from my preference for black on black, many events over the past two years were not foreseeable, proving again something which I have always believed in, that the only constant is change.
Two years ago, no one could have forecast a massive oil spill would occur in the Gulf of Mexico, a tsunami would devastate Japan, and that protest movements would overthrow longstanding regimes in the Arab world.
All of these events deeply affected the lives of millions of people, and their effects have rippled through our business world with outcomes which are still unclear.
They also are a good reminder to us about the hazards of predicting the future.
Recently, a journalist, apparently younger than me, wrote this in the Montreal Gazette:
“As a child of the ’80s, I grew up with predictions of flying cars, space as the next suburban neighborhood, and domesticated robots to do all the housework. This was all going to happen by the dawn of the new millennium, but I have yet to see a flying car (although we are getting closer), no humans are living on Mars, and nobody I know has a robotic servant. No one can argue that civilization has not come a long way, but futuristic dreams have given way to survival and prevention … We are in the midst of a fascinating paradox. We face environmental, financial, technological and societal turmoil, but we are living in an era of remarkable transformation.”
Now, if you expect to hear about flying cars, I’m afraid you wandered into the wrong session.
What I really want to talk about is the need for what the writer referred to as “an era of remarkable transformation.”
I believe we are in a time of historical challenges for our industry, for our society, and for our planet. A time that demands that we think boldly about transformation, and not just traditional, incremental changes.
I believe the job ahead requires us to maximize our intelligence, our creativity and our ability to work together in order to imagine and build a more manageable new future.
I want to begin with a look at some of the economic forces that will affect our fate in the year that has just begun, recognizing that the uncertainty hanging over the global economies makes it difficult to provide reliable insight into what the future holds in store.
The current situation doesn’t favor a business like ours – an industry that is extremely capital intensive, requires thorough medium- and long-term planning, and is highly sensitive to economic downturns.
Today there are two significant threats fuelling fears on either side of the Atlantic: the specter of a faltering recovery in North America and the sovereign debt situation in Europe.
In the past five years, the certainties and points of reference that we had been able to construct for ourselves from the end of the Second World War were abruptly swept away.
As often happens in such dark moments, we went on the search for the guilty ones.
But I believe a different perspective is needed. We need to look further back in time, if we are to find the explanation for what we are currently living through.
The current uncertainty is a by-product of the improper, or at best incomplete, execution of two large experiments.
The first, clearly driven by the United States, had as a clear objective the liberalization and deregulation of financial markets.
The second, concocted in Europe, proposed the Single Market and Single Currency as THE solution to the political instability that had characterized Europe for hundreds of years and resulted, as a final act, in the tragic manifestation we know as WWII.
The first experiment brought us close to Armageddon.
The second has the potential to finish the job.
Just to put people’s minds at rest, I am not here to preach doom and gloom. In fact, I don’t subscribe to the more pessimistic scenarios.
Many Americans are very critical of their elected officials in Washington, and perhaps rightly so, because of the inability to reach consensus on balancing the budget and stimulating the economy.
The U.S. economic recovery has been agonizingly slow, but that is not unexpected considering the body blow that it took.
It is a sobering fact that the net home equity in American homes declined from $12.9 trillion during the housing bubble in 2007 to $6.2 trillion in 2011. A total of $6.7 trillion in household wealth was vaporized. To put it into perspective, that amount represents more than the 2010 total Gross Domestic Product of China.
This severe setback represents an important reason that U.S. new-vehicle sales have risen only modestly the past two years.
Notwithstanding the magnitude of the setback that the economy as a whole and the automotive sector in particular suffered in 2008 and 2009, the rebuilding of the U.S. automotive business over the past three years has been driven by a profound sense of responsibility coupled with extraordinary determination and resolve by everyone involved in the process, trade unions included.
The end result of this painful reconstruction has been good.
We’ve seen the pace of new-vehicle sales pick up in the past few months, with one factor being replacement demand, as the average age of vehicles on American roads is now at an all-time record of more than 10 years.
There are several other reasons for optimism about 2012, with consumer confidence creeping up and employment recovery beginning to gain momentum. Home sales are rising, as is spending on durable goods, especially cars.
So the trend is upbeat, even if total vehicle sales will still remain below the pre-recession levels.
Twenty-six months ago, when the new Chrysler Group revealed its five-year plan, we actually forecasted a U.S. market of 12.7 million vehicles in 2011, and the final number came in at 12.8 million — close enough for horseshoes and hand grenades.
Our plan forecasts U.S. sales in 2012 to rise to 13.7 million. If I get as close to the projected SAAR right two years in a row, I’m going to give up this job, not follow Automotive News’ advice for 2012 of staying away from forecasts, and open up a fortune-telling business, 1-800-CALL-SERGIO.
Not too many years ago, the U.S. industry looked at a 16 million SAAR as a permanent fixture in the landscape.
Yet it endured a level of industrial inefficiency that yielded negative margins in the sale of vehicles, with positive margins coming from related activities such as financing.
In response to the recession in North America, all the players found the courage to make transformational changes. Automakers, governments, suppliers and labor unions faced up to the need to create a leaner, more competitive paradigm.
During the restructuring of the industry, every ounce of unnecessary capacity was taken out of the system.
The U.S. industry has been retooled to the extent that, speaking at least for Chrysler but probably for the other Detroit players, we can survive at a 10 million SAAR.
Making and selling great cars is once again at the center of the business, as it should be. The important thing is to maintain the discipline that the restructuring forced in 2008 and 2009.
While the pace of America’s economic bounce-back may be disappointing to some, you need to realize that you don’t always have to be good looking to win a beauty contest.
Sometimes, just being the least ugly person on the podium is enough. That is why the U.S. looks very attractive compared with the slowdown in emerging markets and the crisis in Europe.
The real problem we face right now on a global scale is Europe.
The Euro crisis, the currency itself and the alleged union it represents, are clearly the single largest issues causing nervousness in markets around the world.
Even though the European community is facing one of the most difficult periods since formation of the Union, the political priority for many member states is to resolve their internal issues.
This focus on narrow national interests creates the serious risk of destroying the dream of unity and solidity upon which the European Union was founded.
We keep hearing political leaders say that they are willing to embrace financial rigor and discipline, but we have yet to see how these austerity plans will be carried out. Some tough medicine will need to be part of the solution.
It’s an issue we are watching very carefully to understand the risks it poses to the market in general and the auto sector in particular.
The fallout from a European recession would not be confined. It would spread to North America, impacting banks and leading to a tightening of credit, as well as to a decline in U.S. exports to the Eurozone.
We can only make contingency plans to deal with the consequences and hope that we get a timely resolution.
But the current state of affairs also offers Europe a great opportunity to transform its structure and take its future into its own hands, to choose the path of political and economic union, in addition to monetary union, and to finally delineate a clear and well-defined arrangement that can sustain a prosperous future.
When Chrysler underwent its rebirth and entered into an alliance with Fiat in June 2009, Chrysler was barely off of life support and it was the U.S. economy that was a disaster.
Yet by 2011, Chrysler was back in the black, with operating profit expected to reach $2 billion.
Our sales and market share showed significant gains in both the U.S. and Canada. Independent surveys confirm that quality is markedly improved.
The company paid back every cent of its U.S. and Canadian government loans, with interest, six years early, rewarding the faith shown in us and freeing us to chart our own destiny.
The payback also cleared the way for Fiat to acquire a majority stake in Chrysler and the formation of a single leadership team for Fiat-Chrysler.
And because of the weakness of the European auto market, it was Fiat’s Brazilian operations and the profits from Chrysler that helped sustain Fiat.
In less than three years, the tables have turned as far as regional economies go. But the underlying rationale for the partnership remains the same: to create the mass and the efficiencies demanded by global competition.
The U.S. recession provided critical impetus to address structural issues that the industry had dragged behind it for years. Issues such as wastefulness, brand-destroying marketing strategies, and – at the root of it all – chronic overcapacity.
The Fiat-Chrysler relationship is a response to mutual opportunity designed to create value by leveraging the unique benefits each group could bring to the other.
Europe has so far failed to come to grips with overcapacity and is in denial over the reality that the natural level of sales will be lower in the next several years.
As Fiat and Chrysler go forward, our international presence will help us remain flexible to take advantage of changing conditions in different markets, giving us alternatives to supply production as long as we can maintain the same level of manufacturing integrity throughout the system.
From the beginning, we believed Fiat and Chrysler offered unique benefits to each other and that we could achieve possibilities that would elude either one of us alone.
Fiat provided Chrysler with technical know-how and important leadership skills honed from its own recovery from a near-death experience, just a few years earlier.
Chrysler’s leadership proved to be equally courageous in embracing the challenge to shape their own future. They understood the need for step changes in productivity, quality and speed, not just marginal improvements.
For Chrysler’s leadership team, this reimagining of the future meant going beyond long-time habits and traditional paths.
The first thing we did was to flatten the organization like never before in order to create a fast-moving team. Leaders took on broad spans of control to expedite decision-making, and about two dozen people reported directly to me as CEO.
We began implementing World Class Manufacturing, or WCM, which was pioneered by Fiat, a true step change that is based on a maniacal desire to remove waste from production processes.
WCM represents a radical change on the factory floor, and its success in improving safety, efficiency and quality relies on the intelligence, experience and creativity of the people who work in our plants.
In order to change the conversation about our products, we challenged our organization to bring out 16 all-new or substantially refreshed products.
You may have heard the story before, about how we accomplished this in only 19 months. It’s become sort of a mantra.
But the speed and the quality of that execution were beyond any conventional expectation. It took a fearless team effort to bring about such remarkable results.
We understood that consumer attitudes about Chrysler lagged behind the new reality that we were building. In order to draw attention, we set out to break the mold when it came to advertising.
Out-of-the-box thinking led us to approach Eminem, who had never before appeared in a commercial, and to craft a Chrysler 200 ad that paid homage to our industrial roots in Detroit and celebrated the resilience of the people who make up our Group, people who have been to hell and back and yet aspire to create a better future.
With this commercial, we took a chance and became the first marketer to run a two-minute commercial on the Super Bowl. It was a calculated, all-or-nothing risk. In fact, we needed special permission from the network and league to delay resumption of the game to run the spot.
As you know, the commercial was wildly popular during the game and on Youtube, it has surpassed 21 million views. It also won the award at the Cannes International Advertising Festival in France as the best automotive commercial in the world.
Some critics questioned whether it would also move the metal. The answer is in the numbers. For the full year, the Chrysler 200 ended up outselling its predecessor by 127 percent.
Another area where we have sought to create a new paradigm is in labor negotiations.
History has taught us that the old adversarial relationships will lead us all on a path of irrelevance in today’s global market. As Martin Luther King Jr. said, “We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.”
Our negotiations with the UAW were tough, but in the end both sides realized we could not afford to repeat the mistakes of the past, the same mistakes that brought us to bankruptcy. It would have been shameful to squander the incredible second chance that we had received from taxpayers.
All of our people, represented and non-represented, have worked together with unwavering dedication to bring Chrysler back from the brink. And it is only right that all should share in the success so far and in the wealth that we hope to create in the years ahead.
At the same time, we know that success is never assured. Our industry is cyclical, and we cannot leave ourselves vulnerable by taking on fixed costs that constrain our ability to survive inevitable downturns.
I believe the four-year agreement we reached with the UAW moves us toward this new path, and it is my hope it represents a new era that will yield positive results.
Last month, Fiat also reached a historic contract with Italian Unions that cleared the way for significant investments in that country. The key to the agreement was a common understanding that we collectively needed a new approach that reflects global standards for competitiveness.
Underlying all of the changes I have cited has been a transformation of culture at both Fiat and Chrysler.
We are bound together by values that are at the core of our organizations:
- honesty and integrity in our choices
- humility and respect in our dealings with others
- and an understanding that our actions have consequences far beyond the office walls.
These values are vital to us being able to confront the future.
They underpin our attempt to forge an international alliance.
We are cognizant that it is an enormous challenge, to bring together the best of the two groups without repudiating the distinct identities of either Fiat or Chrysler.
Rather than a merger that creates a homogenous entity, we are creating a mosaic, in which each piece keeps its identity but contributes to the whole picture.
Over at Cobo Hall, during the North American International Auto Show, you can see a significant proof point of what the alliance is capable of producing.
The all-new 2013 Dodge Dart C-Class sedan is the first Chrysler Group vehicle to feature a Fiat-derived architecture.
The Dart is based on the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, with its dimensions made wider and longer for American drivers’ preferences.
It’s an important product in and of itself because the C-sedan market is the biggest retail segment in the U.S., about 1.6 million vehicles, and for the first time in a long while we will have a competitive vehicle in that crowded field.
The Dart also is significant because it is the acid test of our ability to successfully execute the kind of technology transfer on which our collective future depends. By 2014, a majority of Chrysler’s worldwide car volumes will be based on donor architectures from Fiat.
Finally, the Dart represents a big step in fulfilling the commitment made by Fiat to help Chrysler introduce its fuel-efficient cars and engines to the North American market.
The fuel efficiency challenge is one of the biggest issues facing the industry, and not just because of daunting government regulations.
As an industry, we need to look beyond the narrow interests of our industry and embrace ecological responsibility because we owe it to future generations.
I believe in our industry’s ability to find solutions. Even with traditional combustion engines, we have only skimmed the surface of the ability to squeeze out higher fuel efficiency levels, allowing us to extract much more power out of smaller displacements.
I believe that if we unleash our engineering talent, we can find solutions that are both in line with sustainable mobility while also meeting the desires of our customers for vehicles that are a pleasure to drive.
As an industry, we can choose to reject the notion that we can’t do it.
We can choose instead to adopt the attitude expressed by the author Thomas Carlyle, who said, “Every noble work is at first impossible.”
The fuel-economy issue brings into focus an even larger question for all of our businesses: finding the equilibrium between industrial logic and social responsibility.
I will not pretend that the answer is easy. Philosophers, going back at least as far as Aristotle, have debated what makes a good person and a good citizen.
The question, “What makes a socially responsible company?”, has as many answers as there are business enterprises.
What is important is that the question itself must be part of our decision-making process.
In the end, our real focus is humanity, and the societies in which we live.
This is not an argument against the power and the necessity of free markets.
Capitalism rewards creativity and encourages people to develop their abilities to the fullest. The quest for profits drives our economic progress.
We have not found a better system to improve the standard of living for societies.
Profits allow us to employ workers and pay taxes that sustain schools and services. It creates wages that ripple through the economy, enabling other businesses to thrive.
Global competition forces us to focus our attention on eliminating waste.
The economic ups and downs of the past several years have driven home this absolute need for efficiency.
Ensuring survival is a paramount requirement for every business. It was the crucial consideration for both groups in the Fiat-Chrysler alliance.
However, market forces alone can’t solve larger social issues. In fact, they can be merciless if they are not influenced by human values such as integrity, compassion, and appreciation for people and for nature.
Globalization and the advance of technology increase efficiency, but they also contribute to the social crisis we are seeing in many parts of the world, from the Arab uprisings to the protests that formed spontaneously in many European countries and to the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Some commentators have begun referring to our times as the “age of outrage.”
In emerging markets, we see people fighting for their piece of the wealth created by globalization.
In mature markets, we see people who have been dislocated, robbed of their jobs, security and dignity by large global forces that they did not create.
Time magazine declared “The Protester” as its “Person of the Year.”
In explaining its selection, Time wrote: “All over the world, the protesters of 2011 share a belief that their countries’ political systems and economies have grown dysfunctional and corrupt – sham democracies rigged to favor the rich and powerful and prevent significant change.”
The fact is, even if we look at this trend only through the lens of business, this anger can have a significant impact.
Political instability is disruptive to an economy, and it discourages investment.
Taking this to an even higher level, a free society that wants to endure has a vested interest in supporting those affected by changes caused by movements in the market.
A factor that has heightened dissatisfaction is the realization that the gap between rich and poor has become a gulf. Anger is fueled further by the fact that some of the main architects of our economic mess walked away unscathed.
Some income inequality is a natural result of markets that operate freely.
But it is the narrowing of income gaps that creates mass markets for products such as new cars and trucks.
According to a study released a few months ago by the International Monetary Fund, societies with larger income inequalities find it harder to sustain growth. People on the lower end of the income continuum lack the finances to invest in education and entrepreneurial activity.
On the other hand, broad-based prosperity provides the fertile ground for long-term growth.
These issues call into focus the moral responsibility of our actions.
The leaders at Fiat and Chrysler recognize the need to respond in a way that helps our time become an age of hope and action.
Our actions start at home.
Our two groups have home countries that are integral to their identities.
Fiat has historic ties and a privileged relationship with Italy. And Chrysler owes its continued existence to taxpayers in the U.S. and Canada.
Last month, Fiat unveiled the new Panda that will be built at our Pomigliano plant.
The decision to locate production at our facility in southern Italy was not based on purely economic or rational considerations.
It was a decision based in part on recognizing a moral duty to protect and contribute to the welfare of those who live in the communities where we have our roots.
It was also a decision made possible by workers at the plant, who chose to join us in the challenge of remaking Italian competitiveness.
At the same time, Chrysler is living up to its commitment to rebuild the auto industry in North America.
Since June 2009, we have announced investments totaling $4.5 billion in the U.S. and Canada, and we have added nearly 9,000 jobs.
In December, we announced a plan to reopen the Conner Avenue Assembly Plant in Detroit to rebuild the next-generation SRT Viper, bringing 150 jobs back to the City of Detroit.
There is no question that the City faces enormous challenges.
We are committed to being part of the solution, to working with other stakeholders to reimagine the future and transform Detroit.
Not far from here is a memorial to Joe Louis, a hero of both the city and the nation. It is a 24-foot long arm and fist, held in balanced suspension, and it is one of the iconic scenes of Detroit that was featured in our Super Bowl commercial.
Joe Louis knew what it was to be defeated. In fact, he famously lost to the German boxer Max Schmeling in 1936, an outcome that was used as a propaganda victory for the Nazi regime’s claims of ethnic superiority.
In 1938, the two fighters met again.
This time, Joe Louis knocked out his opponent in the first round, in a historic fight filled with social and international overtones.
It was this ability to come back from a crushing defeat that defined Joe Louis’ character, just as the refusal to accept a death sentence is what sustained Chrysler through its crisis.
It is this kind of spirit that will transform Detroit. Our job as leaders is to harness the immense energy that is looking for direction.
Automotive News page 15 of 17 01/11/2012
We owe a lot to this city and we have a moral obligation to help transform it into a better place.
This is why I have agreed to serve as the 2012 Campaign Chair for the United Way for Southeastern Michigan, and I hope some of the area’s other business leaders will become personally involved in this effort.
It’s not just a matter of raising money. Make no mistake, cash keeps the machine running, but I’m hoping for a commitment that goes deeper to help sustain and improve the communities where we live and work.
I want to close by telling you a few things you may not know about our Jefferson Avenue Assembly Plant, located just a few miles from here.
Even before the Fiat-Chrysler alliance was formalized in 2009, I toured the plant.
And it gave me pause about entering the relationship, as the factory had suffered obvious industrial neglect during Chrysler’s dark days.
In the fall of 2009 we shut the plant down for four weeks to begin the transformation to World Class Manufacturing and to allow for changeover to the all-new Jeep Grand Cherokee.
During this time, our 1,251 employees transformed the working conditions. They removed 38 tons of scrap and debris and applied 7,650 gallons of paint while cleaning and restoring basic conditions, an effort that allowed them to take ownership of their place of work. Team leaders were trained on WCM processes and workers identified 308 unsafe conditions that were addressed.
By May 2010 we began building the new Grand Cherokee, which has subsequently won more awards than any SUV in history.
It has proven to be a landmark vehicle in our effort to restore credibility to the house.
Two months later we added a second shift and President Obama visited the plant.
In December 2010 we launched a second product at the plant, the Dodge Durango.
Last week, we announced plans to add another 1,100 jobs and a third crew at Jefferson North in early 2013 in order to meet demand for the vehicles we are building there, including a new diesel version of the Grand Cherokee for North America.
In 2013, we will begin preparing the plant to build a Maserati SUV, with a Ferrari engine.
This is a story of revitalization in a company that was regarded as irrelevant, set in a city that has been disparaged as a failure.
It is just one example of how impossible feats of recovery can be achieved if we work together in good faith, realizing that we have a stake in each other’s success.
Fiat and Chrysler come from two different pasts, but they have something very strong in common.
Both have been to hell and back.
Both have lived through the experience of being sentenced to death: by the press, the financial world and the public at large.
Fiat lived it in 2004 and Chrysler just 3 years ago.
Both found the strength and courage to challenge destiny and change it.
Those who are put to such a test, who survive, will never be as before.
Those who survive, who find the strength and courage to stand and fight, will never be as before.
Survivors are different people, special people.
My colleagues and I are survivors.
We have learned to look at the future in a different way than before, in a different way than others.
We all gain strength from the experience of overcoming adversity.
We don’t shy away from making tough decisions, and we are able to adapt to challenges.
The decisions we make today at Fiat-Chrysler are informed by the experience of near-extinction and a resolve to never again get so perilously close to demise.
Everyone at Fiat and Chrysler has gained an appreciation of each moment in this new life that has been granted us.
We treasure what the experience has given us, which has changed us for good.
Because now we all know that ultimately, regardless of circumstances, we have the power to refuse our consent.
We have the power and a moral obligation to refuse our consent to decay, to industrial neglect, to wasteful activities, to disengage from competition – because ultimately, consenting to all these things would not only be a denial of our own right to life, but also of our duty to protect the welfare of our people.
What has happened in Detroit is proof certain that fundamental transformation can occur if we have the courage to pursue the challenge of rebuilding.
As leaders, it is up to us, individually and collectively, to choose hope, and to strive to make it a reality.
Thank you very much.
Transcript courtesy of Automotive News and Chrysler Media.
•
Like on Facebook • Tags:
Automotive News,
Sergio Marchionne,
speech.
Posted on January 11th, 2012 • by David Zatz
Charles “Pete” Hagenbuch, who once headed Chrysler’s production engine performance tuning and has worked on many of the company’s most famous engines, died this morning.
Pete graduated from West Virginia University in 1956, and earned an MAE degree from the Chrysler Institute of Engineering in 1958. He worked on the the 426 Hemi, the B/RB-series big blocks, the LA small blocks, the 2.2 turbos, and even the Australian Hemi Six.
In retirement, Pete was friendly and approachable, and volunteered a good deal of his time at the Walter P. Chrysler Museum in Auburn Hills. He participated in a two part interview with Allpar, and answered more questions by email later. He is survived by his wife, Ann, by his children, Cathy, Peter, and Daniel, and by nine grand-children and one great-grandchild.
Services will be held on Saturday at 3:30 pm at the University Presbyterian Church in Rochester Hills, Michigan. In lieu of flowers, Ann Hagenbuch requested that people donate to the Walter P. Chrysler Museum.
Dyno operator Ed Poplawski wrote, “Pete was a great guy to work for…Pete was very hands on involved in all phases of the testing. He always had a plan in place and you knew where you stood with him. He made a point to make sure all our equipment was running and backed me up if any problems came up.”
Burke Brown, who was in charge of the original LX cars’ development, wrote, “I would call him the consummate absolute role model of the dyno development performance engineer. He was all about running the dyno, getting really good data, sitting down and looking at that data, he understood all that stuff really well.”
While with Chrysler, he gained some fame as a slot car builder, and is to be featured soon in a book on the subject.
With the Detroit Auto Show over, it may be worth some time to look at one of the men who made yesterday’s and today’s Mopars possible.
•
Like on Facebook •
Posted on January 11th, 2012 • by Bill Cawthon
Auburn Hills is probably looking more tempting than ever to Fiat/Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne, if only because the U.S. government isn’t harassing him.
Reported in today’s Il Sole 24 Oro, Elsa Fornero, the Italian Minister of Labor, announced she wishes to meet with Marchionne “as soon as possible” to discuss “in person his intentions.”
Fornero says she is primarily interested in Fiat’s employment plans for Italy.
Though it wasn’t mentioned, the announcement comes on the heels of another Marchionne comment about the future location of the combined companies headquarters. In a discussion with reporters at the North American International Auto Show, Marchionne said the future company could be based in Europe, North America or Latin America. Fiat has a very strong presence in Brazil.
The first time Marchionne mentioned the possibility that Fiat might leave Turin, former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi demanded Marchionne attend a special Saturday meeting to discuss the matter.
For an answer to her questions about Fiat’s plans for Italian employment, Minister Fornero need look only as far from Rome as Pomigliano d’Arco, near Naples, one of the hardest-hit Italian regions in terms of jobs. At the Fiat plant there, unions agreed to a new contract that improves productivity and reduces absenteeism. In return, Fiat pulled production of one of its most popular lines, the Panda, from the Fiat plant in Tichy, Poland, and gave it to Pomigliano, increasing the factory’s work ten-fold.
Similar events are taking place at the former Bertone Grugliasco plant and the huge Mirafiori plant in Turin.
In the midst of financial chaos, it’s not surprising the Italian government is looking for guarantees but, time after time, Marchionne has said the future depends heavily on what actions the new government of Silvio Monti takes to restore the Italian economy.
Even John Elkann, Chairman of the Fiat Board, shows signs of impatience with the government’s demands. When the subject of a possible move first arose, Elkann was quick to say Fiat would never leave Italy. In more recent comments, Elkann said Fiat will build cars, no matter what, but it’s up to the government as to whether Fiat will build them in Italy.
•
Like on Facebook • Tags:
Chrysler,
Fiat,
Italian government,
Sergio Marchionne.
Discuss the news