<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming &amp; Alternative Fuels : Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/</link>
	<description>Chrysler, car, and other discussions by Allpar contributors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:08:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: CanadianJeepYJ</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-12019</link>
		<dc:creator>CanadianJeepYJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/#comment-12019</guid>
		<description>Knowing nothing about how one goes to calculate the albedo effect (other then the basic physics of the process), I would initially think that it would not be a constant.  An increase in the pollution may in-fact increase our albedo effect....and I am stating this with no knowledge in meteorology or what ever field that may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing nothing about how one goes to calculate the albedo effect (other then the basic physics of the process), I would initially think that it would not be a constant.  An increase in the pollution may in-fact increase our albedo effect&#8230;.and I am stating this with no knowledge in meteorology or what ever field that may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-12010</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/#comment-12010</guid>
		<description>The satellites usually give about 0.3 for the Earth&#039;s bolometric Bond albedo; recent evidence is that it may not be fixed.  NASA gives 0.306 in their &quot;planetary fact sheet.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The satellites usually give about 0.3 for the Earth&#8217;s bolometric Bond albedo; recent evidence is that it may not be fixed.  NASA gives 0.306 in their &#8220;planetary fact sheet.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CanadianJeepYJ</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-8954</link>
		<dc:creator>CanadianJeepYJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2006/09/27/global-warming-alternative-fuels-part-iii/#comment-8954</guid>
		<description>Although Barton....I have never seen our planets albedo number....so it will help if I redo this calculation with additional information for another blog....  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Barton&#8230;.I have never seen our planets albedo number&#8230;.so it will help if I redo this calculation with additional information for another blog&#8230;.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
