Comments on: More insane regulations coming our way?

By: Curtis Redgap

Curtis Redgap — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:02:24 +0000

Sorry Dave, can’t agree with you less. There is no difference. We all know why ABC didn’t run with the story. They wanted saved until now for as much influence peddling as they could contrive out it all. Again, no agreement about taxes. The burden is way too high already. HR 25 needs to be passed and the IRS and the current income confiscation system eliminated. The debt is way too high, however, recall that Clinton balanced his budget on the single largest tax increase in the country’s history, despite all the hoopla about his remake of welfare and going centrist about money. The GAO this week just reported however, that the Federal Debt will be cut by half, and three years sooner than predicted. Borrowing? That is the very concept and the crowning achievement of having the Federal Reserve System. It will never go away. The media is absolutely liberal in it’s outlook. The problem there is the influence of the huge media owning moguls, as well as the undue interference of people like George Soros who has his own agenda which is suspicious. Probably seeking to be king or something. Polosei is too busy running around crowing tax increase to be bothered with items that might affect the ethics committee. The Democrat platform is nothing but words. Troop “realignments.” Which is nothing more than “withdrawal.” A huge mistake right now. “Funding increases” which means “TAX more.” Their is no real answer to the mess we are in, no leadership, and no guidance to get there. The Democrat party has been hi-jacked and taken over by the far left shills exemplified like Howard Dean the DNC leader. The BBC? You trust the BBC for anything? The original “lets make it all up to look like the real thing” people? The so called Florida confession was later proved conclusively to have been bought and paid for by the very same folks through three or four outside parties that were traced back to an “unamed” money source. Probably George Soros again. Dave, do you not see what is occurring? By division created by the spinmeisters employed (and very well paid) by both political entities, the results are nothing more than arguments with no resolution. I am not engaged to split whether it is a good thing to accept a misdemeanor or a felony. To me they are both criminal acts, and smack, as in criminal behavior patterns, of deeper undiscovered things that probably would sicken us all if disclosed! I seek a consensous that the two party system is so corrupt it is berift of any further support by any one in any way. That this country is in such deep trouble, immediate corrective action BY THE PEOPLE to redress the ills must be initiated. Congress is so dead locked in maintenance of their positions they are not responsible to the people anymore, and Congressman could care less only seeking to continue in their positions, smacking away the corruption garnering untold millions for themselves at our expense. Sleaze is sleaze and should not be tolerated on any level in any way in our public institutions.

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:14:22 +0000

1) Democrats only criticize. Have you visited their web site, where youc an get their full platform? Perhaps it’s the “liberal media” that never reports their actual positions and platform.

2) The Republicans did have that news; the Democrats as far as I know did not have it 18 months ago, and if they leaked it to ABC 18 months ago, whyd id ABC not run it?

3) As for tax increases, I’d hope so. How long can you borrow and borrow? The tab has to be paid eventually, and the sooner the better.

4) How do you know Polesi hasn’t been making recommednations on changes to the ethics committee? You only read what the newspaper reports, right? Remember that first Bush election? There was a videotaped confession aired on the BBC-TV by one of the guys who fixed the Florida results, and that never made it to the USA newspapers.

5) Yes, Harry Reid and many other Congressmen are certainly guilty of sleazy acts - but not quite as sleazy, again, as starting a war with profit as the sole motivation, refusing to provide aid before a hurricane when it would be useful and then funneling aid after the hurricane to chosen no-bid companies that they’ve invested in, or revealing the identity of an active CIA spy (and their cover operation) for political gain.

There IS a difference. Both are sleazy; but it’s like saying that a felony is the same as a misdemeanor.

By: Curtis Redgap

Curtis Redgap — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:42:20 +0000

Sure, but the Democrats only criticise and point fingers of blame, yet have nothing to offer to make changes that will benefit the country. Perhaps the Republicans did have the information about Foley a year ago, however, it does not excuse the Democrats who had it over three years ago, and leaked it to ABC news 18 months ago, only to make sure it was released just prior to the election. I say it again. Neither party is of much worth. Beyond any shadow of doubt each party is just as bad as the other. Neither can go to the moral high ground, NEITHER party. The election isn’t even over, and you have Nancy Polesi, running around makeing ill advised statements about TAX INCREASES already, when she becomes Speaker. Now that is outrageous. Wouldn’t you think she would be more conerned in making certain that the ethics committe is fixed so that another Foley is prevented? Taxes? NOW?? Clean up the act first, won’t ya? And now we have Senator Harry Reid making literally a triple of his orginal investment, a million on a land deal that he just happened to forget to mention to Congressional regulators, and won’t answer questions about it. He didn’t do anything any different than Randy Cunningham did, and Cunningham is serving 8 years for it. I can’t believe how swarmy things are, however, the true fear to watch out for is continued voter apathy, because folks, it can, and take this to heart, it WILL get much worse if the people don’t act to stop it. Least you forget, the wolf is at the door, and if we don’t defeat the enemies we are currently engaged with, we WILL be fighting them right here at home. We can’t afford to loose.

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 07 Oct 2006 23:36:28 +0000

I will point out that the last two presidential candidates from the Democrat side resorted to dirty ads only as a last resoirt, while the Republican strategy has been to start out dirty and get even dirtier. I haven’t seen any Democrat smearing a Republican like the Republicans went after distinguished war veterans on the other side - not just Kerry but also that guy who lost the use of all four limbs in the war.

What’s more, the entire Republican national election fund was committed far in advance to a purely negative campaign - long before the first Democrat attack ad (not that I’ve seen one yet.)

Tom Kean - you remember him, right? - started out with a bunch of telephone calls “from an independent polling agency” which started out neutral and then reminded us many times that Menendez has been accused of wrongdoing (by a Republican prosecutor, oddly enough) while Tom Kean is the great American from the 9/11 Commission. He is also one of the architects of that series of lies called The Path to 9/11, an especially shameful abuse of the terrorist attacks which shifts blame from the guy who didn’t care to the guy who tried, and a really scummy governor who left the state with a massive budget deficit and a bloated deficit.

No, the two sides are NOT equally bad. Yes, the two sides are BOTH bad. But if you ask me whether I’d rather have Hitler or Alexander Hamilton (or some other mildly but not totally evil historical figure), I’d pick Hamilton, thank you, even though he tried to make American into a monarchy and tried to cheat John Adams out of the presidency.

PS> Isn’t it interesting in the Foley sex scandal that the Republican National Committee was informed of everything a year in advance and chose to hush it up?