<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The General Motors conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/</link>
	<description>Chrysler, car, and other discussions by Allpar contributors</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bryce owens</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-38365</link>
		<dc:creator>bryce owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-38365</guid>
		<description>woah! GM and Chrysler? dont think that will work... i grew up in a mopar faimly my dad came from a GM failmy...he hates those things, thats why we have mopars! and mom dosnt like breaking down on the side of the road so she dosnt want anything to do with GM especialy after waiting 2 months to get her Daewoo serviced!(she no longer owns it was replaced with a mopar. Mopars are tough to the frame! my older sister has a '98 Neon Sport R/T with 175,000 or more on it... she hot rods it and every thing... and it still runs like it did when she bought it wit 43,000 on it in 03. Why get rid of a good thing with the new "Phenoix" v-6 engines? the chrysler v-6s are durable! 95 dodge gr caravan with 125,000 on the odo is still runing strong! and after my sisters got trought with it its fine! and all i can say about my friends with GM cars is that they hate them! they are junk... and i will never drive them.. and if this were to happen... wich it wont because Cerberus has them... i would buy a use per DAIMLERchrysler Chrysler!

Small Town Boy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woah! <a href="http://www.acarplace.com/brands/gm.html"target="_blank" title="GM"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.acarplace.com');">GM</a> and Chrysler? dont think that will work&#8230; i grew up in a <a href="/mopar.html">mopar</a> faimly my dad came from a GM failmy&#8230;he hates those things, thats why we have mopars! and mom dosnt like breaking down on the side of the road so she dosnt want anything to do with GM especialy after waiting 2 months to get her Daewoo serviced!(she no longer owns it was replaced with a mopar. Mopars are tough to the frame! my older sister has a &#8216;98 Neon Sport R/T with 175,000 or more on it&#8230; she hot rods it and every thing&#8230; and it still runs like it did when she bought it wit 43,000 on it in 03. Why get rid of a good thing with the new &#8220;Phenoix&#8221; v-6 <a target="_blank" title="engines" href="/mopar.html">engines</a>? the chrysler v-6s are durable! 95 dodge gr caravan with 125,000 on the odo is still runing strong! and after my sisters got trought with it its fine! and all i can say about my friends with GM <a title="cars" href="http://www.allpar.com/model/index.html"target="_blank" title="mopar"  >cars</a> is that they hate them! they are junk&#8230; and i will never drive them.. and if this were to happen&#8230; wich it wont because Cerberus has them&#8230; i would buy a use per DAIMLERchrysler Chrysler!</p>
<p>Small Town Boy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-28321</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-28321</guid>
		<description>GM and Chrysler together a good stablity ideaology, think of foreign auto makers as theif of North American identication, is it about money? or is it fifty years from now and your children dont even know what General Motors stands for, Next do we do start selling provinces and its heritage,cause we don't fit corprate idealogies
next motor design , V 6 rotor drive motor , instead of stopping a motor from torguing in the motor mounts, let it spin ,to stage  bell housing to transfer the energy, or a magnetic fly wheel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.acarplace.com/brands/gm.html"target="_blank" title="GM"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.acarplace.com');">GM</a> and Chrysler together a good stablity ideaology, think of foreign auto makers as theif of North American identication, is it about money? or is it fifty years from now and your children dont even know what <a href="http://www.acarplace.com/brands/gm.html"target="_blank" title="General Motors"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.acarplace.com');">General Motors</a> stands for, Next do we do start selling provinces and its heritage,cause we don&#8217;t fit corprate idealogies<br />
next motor design , V 6 rotor drive motor , instead of stopping a motor from torguing in the motor mounts, let it spin ,to stage  bell housing to transfer the energy, or a magnetic fly wheel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mopar 4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-12066</link>
		<dc:creator>Mopar 4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-12066</guid>
		<description>I Kinda like the idea of GE or their former associate Penske as owners of Chrysler Group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Kinda like the idea of GE or their former associate Penske as owners of Chrysler Group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-12013</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/02/20/the-general-motors-conundrum/#comment-12013</guid>
		<description>Sorry that you have not done any research. 

1) The clutchless gearbox is not the AutoStick. It is an automated dual-clutch manual transmission that is not just state of the art, but probably the most advanced transmission in the world.

2) GM has $19 billion cash on hand as you say. 

3) Ford has a lot of money because they took out a huge mortgage in order to survive. 

4) Japanese have tons of cash. I am shocked you have not seen how much profit Toyota makes. It is simply insane. And as for image, Toyota has purchased before. Still, I would not expect or want Toy or Honda to buy Chrylser. I respect Toyota and Chrysler too much, and I don't respect Honda enough.

5) Obviously companies with lots of cash could buy chrysler, could they run it? Bill Gates could buy it himself. 

6) Mitsu is concentrating on its own issues.

GM has some amazing technology even if you aren't aware of it. 

I somehow doubt Volkswagen has Hitler's picture showing on their wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that you have not done any research. </p>
<p>1) The clutchless gearbox is not the AutoStick. It is an automated <a href="http://www.allpar.com/corporate/auto-manual-transmission.html"title="dual-clutch"  >dual-clutch</a> manual transmission that is not just state of the art, but probably the most advanced transmission in the world.</p>
<p>2) <a href="http://www.acarplace.com/brands/gm.html"target="_blank" title="GM"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.acarplace.com');">GM</a> has $19 billion cash on hand as you say. </p>
<p>3) Ford has a lot of money because they took out a huge mortgage in order to survive. </p>
<p>4) Japanese have tons of cash. I am shocked you have not seen how much profit Toyota makes. It is simply insane. And as for image, Toyota has purchased before. Still, I would not expect or want Toy or Honda to buy Chrylser. I respect Toyota and Chrysler too much, and I don&#8217;t respect Honda enough.</p>
<p>5) Obviously companies with lots of cash could buy chrysler, could they run it? Bill Gates could buy it himself. </p>
<p>6) Mitsu is concentrating on its own issues.</p>
<p>GM has some amazing technology even if you aren&#8217;t aware of it. </p>
<p>I somehow doubt Volkswagen has Hitler&#8217;s picture showing on their wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
