Allpar Weblogs







Is Chrysler getting the attention it deserves?

Once again the automotive press is doing its utmost to avoid any mention of Chrysler, or, at the very least, any POSITIVE mention.

Case in point, the 2008 Viper. First US production car with 600 h.p. Yeah, it got its one month in the spotlight, and a little sprinkling again with the ACR announcement. Meanwhile, the rags have been stuffed with the 2009 Corvette and when THAT didn’t get enough attention, they start touting the 2010 or 2012 or whatever year the next big change is coming. Meanwhile, they don’t talk much about the 2008 Vette cause they know that even their densest readers will realize that they are again dunning Chrysler. And don’t blame the recent departure of Jason Vines, this has been going on long before that.

And The Indianapolis Motor Speedway once AGAIN is going to bore the few open-wheel race fans left in this country with yet another Corvette Pace Car. I always thought that the idea was to use a car that offered something new. It seems to me that the 2008 Vette is a warmed-over 2007 (see preceding paragraph). Maybe the name should be changed to the Corvette Motor Speedway at Indianapolis.

This is nothing new for Chrysler. I remember two consecutive issues from Car and Driver from late 1969/early 1970 when the new 1970 models were fresh and hot. In one issue they road tested the 1970 AAR Cuda. The review wasn’t too bad until they got around to the handling portion. While I can not recall the excat wording, it went basically as follows, “We were even going to say that the AAR was a good handling car until we tried it on the race track. While it did handle well on the street, when pushed hard, like when racing, it exhibited a fair amount of understeer. While some may say that this is a street car, not a race car. We feek that since it is the street version of their Trans Am car, it should be able to handle like a race Trans Am car”. They even went on to suggest that the front and rear tires be switched so as to have the bigger tires on the front. Basically, C & D did their best to run the car down.

Next month, C & D tested the new 1970 Camaro Z28. In THAT test, which was full of raves, they stated that the Z28 handles well on the street but on the race course it pushes its front end badly. But then that is to be expected as this is a streetcar, not an actual Trans Am race car.

Think I’m full of it? I dare anyone to track down those two magazines and post the handling statements from both tests.

Yes, I am only discussing low production specialty cars here, but these are the most obvious examples of what is happening today regarding a company that came BACK to America.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

3 Responses to “Is Chrysler getting the attention it deserves?”


  1. smalltownboy

    wow.
    didnt relize that.
    The Viper would woop a vette any day.
    The Challenger would woop a camero any day.
    The Charger would woop a G8 any day.

  2. Martin

    Ah Hell, Consumer Reports has been doing it for decades!

  3. John Hagen

    Yeah, but you expect that from Consumers Reports. I do remember one particularly laughable report they did. Back in the early 80’s, they did a story on buying used cars. In it they mentioned the Aspen/Volare line and stated that buyers should not over look these cars as they were reliable and economic vehicles. The statement absolutely amazed me considering how they maligned them throughout their entire production run.


Powered by WordPress using a heavily modified version of a theme by Xy Yiyang. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Allpar covers all Chrysler and related vehicles* with news, performance tips, forums, histories, repairs, racing, and more. Use the menus on top of the pages!

Cars - Engines - History - Forums - Repairs - Reviews - Other car reviews - Us - Terms of Service - News - Random link - Corrections/Additions

Allpar Search:

Please read the terms of use! * Mopar, Dodge, Jeep, Chrysler, HEMI, and certain other names are trademarks of Chrysler, LLC. We are not Chrysler. We are not responsible for the consequences of actions taken based on this site and make no guarantees regarding validity or applicability of information or advice. The Webmaster is not an expert. Copyright © 1998-2000, David Zatz; copyright © 2001-2008, Allpar LLC. All rights reserved. Recommend this page!

Bad Behavior has blocked 1129 access attempts in the last 7 days.