<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler and Nissan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/04/28/chrysler-and-nissan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/04/28/chrysler-and-nissan/</link>
	<description>Chrysler, car, and other discussions by Allpar contributors</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jimboy</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/04/28/chrysler-and-nissan/#comment-75662</link>
		<dc:creator>jimboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=292#comment-75662</guid>
		<description>What a perfect opportunity to revive the Plymouth nameplate, and not duplicate existing Chrysler product. Even combining dealerships, as is already the norm in Canada, Chrysler still needs some entry level product. A renewed Plymouth would fit the bill perfectly, and round out the dealer offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a perfect opportunity to revive the Plymouth nameplate, and not duplicate existing Chrysler product. Even combining dealerships, as is already the norm in Canada, Chrysler still needs some entry level product. A renewed Plymouth would fit the bill perfectly, and round out the dealer offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
