<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s time for a Dodge Ram XFE &#8230; and perhaps old-fashioned granny gears.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/10/03/its-time-for-a-dodge-ram-xfe-and-perhaps-old-fashioned-granny-gears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/10/03/its-time-for-a-dodge-ram-xfe-and-perhaps-old-fashioned-granny-gears/</link>
	<description>Chrysler, car, and other discussions by Allpar contributors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/10/03/its-time-for-a-dodge-ram-xfe-and-perhaps-old-fashioned-granny-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-76679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=449#comment-76679</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a small contractor.  I would love a Ram 1000 (or Ram 2000) ST (or WT perhaps?) with a Perkins diesel and 6 speed tranny.  It would be perfect for the job site.  I don&#039;t need a fancy truck on the jobsite, but good mileage would be great.  I&#039;ll still drive a 3500 4X4 diesel quad or crew cab, but just need a basic pickup for the hired hands.  Same thing on the farm.  AS for the Dakota, I liked the previous models, smaller and cheaper.  I would also purchase &quot;new&quot; 1996 or 1999 Dakotas if they were available.  Better truck than the Ranger or S10/Colorado.  Cheaper than a Toyota or Nissan.  The smaller Dakota would be a great parts runner vehicle.  What happened to &quot;basic trucks&quot;?  I remember when even a heater and turn signals were optional (when I was a kid).  Great trucks back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a small contractor.  I would love a Ram 1000 (or Ram 2000) ST (or WT perhaps?) with a Perkins diesel and 6 speed tranny.  It would be perfect for the job site.  I don&#8217;t need a fancy truck on the jobsite, but good mileage would be great.  I&#8217;ll still drive a 3500 4X4 diesel quad or crew cab, but just need a basic pickup for the hired hands.  Same thing on the farm.  AS for the <a href="http://www.allpar.com/trucks/dakota-2008.html" >Dakota</a>, I liked the previous models, smaller and cheaper.  I would also purchase &#8220;new&#8221; 1996 or 1999 Dakotas if they were available.  Better truck than the Ranger or S10/Colorado.  Cheaper than a Toyota or Nissan.  The smaller <a href="http://www.allpar.com/trucks/dakota-2008.html" >Dakota</a> would be a great parts runner vehicle.  What happened to &#8220;basic trucks&#8221;?  I remember when even a heater and turn signals were optional (when I was a kid).  Great trucks back then.
<p style="opacity:0.5;padding:0;margin:0;display:inline;"><sub><a href="http://www.janhvizdak.com/make-donation-cross-linker-plugin-wordpress.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.janhvizdak.com/make-donation-cross-linker-plugin-wordpress.php'); return false;" target="_blank" style="cursor:help;"><b>&#187;crosslinked&#171;</b></a></sub></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/10/03/its-time-for-a-dodge-ram-xfe-and-perhaps-old-fashioned-granny-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-76673</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=449#comment-76673</guid>
		<description>I agree with Greg&#039;s comments, downsize the Dakota - say to a compact size AND reduce weight and engine size for those who want it on the Ram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Greg&#8217;s comments, downsize the <a href="http://www.allpar.com/trucks/dakota-2008.html" >Dakota</a> &#8211; say to a compact size AND reduce weight and engine size for those who want it on the Ram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/10/03/its-time-for-a-dodge-ram-xfe-and-perhaps-old-fashioned-granny-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-76672</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=449#comment-76672</guid>
		<description>Dodge already built this vehicle in the past. It was called the Dakota. All they have to do is stop trying to make the Dakota a Ram, and let it become a Dakota again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dodge already built this vehicle in the past. It was called the <a href="http://www.allpar.com/trucks/dakota-2008.html" >Dakota</a>. All they have to do is stop trying to make the <a href="http://www.allpar.com/trucks/dakota-2008.html" >Dakota</a> a Ram, and let it become a <a href="http://www.allpar.com/trucks/dakota-2008.html" >Dakota</a> again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

