<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiat: the best choice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2009/01/20/fiat-the-best-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2009/01/20/fiat-the-best-choice/</link>
	<description>Chrysler, car, and other discussions by Allpar contributors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveAdmin</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2009/01/20/fiat-the-best-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-77307</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveAdmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=679#comment-77307</guid>
		<description>Looks like you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2009/01/20/fiat-the-best-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-77306</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=679#comment-77306</guid>
		<description>Ok, that didn&#039;t take long. looks like US 87 octane is like European 91-92 (which doesn&#039;t exist). the 95 octane we&#039;ve got is equivalent to the 90-91 premium found at most Canadian stations. 

My owners manual states that I am not to use anything under 95 (Euro system)so that might still be an issue in North America. While people might pay extra for premium in their Alfa, I don&#039;t think they would be too excited about paying the extra for their Panda. But, I suppose it&#039;s just a question of programming the ECU. We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, that didn&#8217;t take long. looks like US 87 octane is like European 91-92 (which doesn&#8217;t exist). the 95 octane we&#8217;ve got is equivalent to the 90-91 premium found at most Canadian stations. </p>
<p>My owners manual states that I am not to use anything under 95 (Euro system)so that might still be an issue in North America. While people might pay extra for premium in their Alfa, I don&#8217;t think they would be too excited about paying the extra for their Panda. But, I suppose it&#8217;s just a question of programming the ECU. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2009/01/20/fiat-the-best-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-77305</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=679#comment-77305</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave, I didn&#039;t know that :) I just assumed that the compression was a bit higher on these small  four cylinder cars. Now you&#039;ve got me curious - I&#039;m going to try to find those equivalents somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave, I didn&#8217;t know that :) I just assumed that the compression was a bit higher on these small  four cylinder cars. Now you&#8217;ve got me curious &#8211; I&#8217;m going to try to find those equivalents somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

