<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Allpar Weblogs &#187; emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/tag/emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs</link>
	<description>Chrysler, car, and other discussions by Allpar contributors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time for different pollution rules</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/12/29/its-time-for-different-pollution-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/12/29/its-time-for-different-pollution-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Zatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars and stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota and Ford are cutting their big-truck capacity while bringing their small cars to the United States. GM and Chrysler are working on increasing gas mileage and bringing electric vehicles to market. All across America, people are starting to downsize their cars and move from huge SUVs to minivans and smaller SUVs, or from minivans [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2008/12/29/its-time-for-different-pollution-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CARB, EPA, and the law: clarifying the history and the future</title>
		<link>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/12/24/carb-epa-and-the-law-clarifying-the-history-and-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/12/24/carb-epa-and-the-law-clarifying-the-history-and-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars and stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mileage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/12/24/carb-epa-and-the-law-clarifying-the-history-and-the-future/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 1967, the EPA has consistently said that California can make its own emissions rules. In fact, California&#8217;s ability to do this is embodied in federal law. With yesterday&#8217;s refusal to grant an additional waiver, the EPA has put itself on very shaky legal ground. Many people think this is really a delaying tactic to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.allpar.com/weblogs/2007/12/24/carb-epa-and-the-law-clarifying-the-history-and-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

