AF: FCA June 2018 Meeting | Page 29 | Allpar Forums
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

FCA June 2018 Meeting

Discussion in 'Mopar / FCA News' started by cygnus, May 17, 2018.

  1. sickboy

    sickboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    897
    Likes:
    888
    Georgio was supposed to be scalable wasn’t it? In length and width? I could see that adding dimension may cause too much flex, but kind of a head scratcher. As far as charger- Updating the current platform is no problem for me personally, but am hoping for awd available for high hp cars. Electric parking brake. Maybe a couple more inches of rear legroom?
    Does anyone know what needs to be done at Brampton to accommodate wider wheels down the assembly line?
     
  2. Beentherebefore

    Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Messages:
    5,703
    Likes:
    2,687
    Yes, he said that he would allow Chrysler (and Dodge) to live but the old expression "damning with faint praise" comes to mind.
     
    LeeRyder likes this.
  3. Adventurer55

    Adventurer55 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    3,204
    Likes:
    4,103
    Its really beginning to look as if Giorgio is fast becoming another CUSW architecture, it seems. Both were promised to be the saving grace for front and rwd/awd vehicles. And yet neither seem to be the highly adaptable platforms FCA really could save money with. Now they seem to indicate they're going to keep the LX and update it which is a great way to keep the cars and not spend tons of money adapting Brampton to Giorgio. Now explain why the 300 has to die if they do this?
     
    UN4GTBL, randy1911 and wtxiceman like this.
  4. hmk123

    Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,177
    Likes:
    3,183
    When we first learned about Alfa being used for the next gen Lx cars many complained that it is too focused on European sports sedan needs and many were worried (including myself) that the unique American needs might not be met (big V8s for example). Many predicted it would suffer the same issues as the Dart. So we can’t have it both ways. One thing one can fault FCA is that there seems to have been a certain amount of flip flopping when it comes to the direction of the Lx. Part of this might be that 1.5 years ago they realized some of the strict EPA regulations might be dialed back and the V8 is here to stay for another decade. Hardly anybody thought that in 2016.

    And all this complaining about the age of the Lx platform seems silly. Nobody is complaining or even mentioning that Ford Fusion’s CD4 platform is an evolution of Mazda’s 1983 midsize car G platform. It comes always back to perception. And auto journalists don’t seem to help...
     
    ScramFan, tlc, danbek and 2 others like this.
  5. Christopher

    Christopher Socially Unacceptable
    Staff Member Level 2 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    5,639
    Likes:
    2,129
    I haven't had time to really go through everything in detail because work is kicking my butt, but did I read that Chrysler will remain in NA but not abroad and Fiat will remain abroad but not in NA.

    If so, it would make sense, I think, to rebrand the 124 as a Dodge, because even though it doesn't offer a big engine, it could be argued that it is sporty and fun.
     
    danbek, link3721, MoparJoe and 2 others like this.
  6. Zagnut27

    Zagnut27 Jeepaholic

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2015
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes:
    10,425
    How much of a platform is genuinely original anyway? Don’t they all incorporate ideas and attributes of earlier platforms at least to some degree? They’re not reinventing the wheel with each new one I’m guessing, just incorporating new ideas and techniques. So updating and modifying an existing platform isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
     
  7. Citation84

    Citation84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes:
    630
    Then it would be a hideously ugly Chrysler. Let Hyundai have it.
     
    UN4GTBL likes this.
  8. Christopher

    Christopher Socially Unacceptable
    Staff Member Level 2 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    5,639
    Likes:
    2,129
    If you haven't read the thread on negativity, I suggest you do so. If you have and have nothing but negative things to post, I suggest you reacquaint yourself with it.

    Proper Forum Etiquette - Civility & Negativity (at https://www.allpar.com/forums/threads/proper-forum-etiquette-civility-negativity.169902/ )

    This thread is not for complaining about what *YOU* think FCA should be doing or what they're doing wrong. It is to discuss the plan, as laid out, and what it means for the future. If you think that the future is that "The Sky if Falling" I suggest you refrain from beating that drum.

    If you insist on doing so, you can expect to take a vacation.
     
    tlc, GasAxe, link3721 and 3 others like this.
  9. TripleT

    TripleT Allpar Legacy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,385
    Likes:
    10,193
    o_O

    You all have to let this Platform idea from the 80s go... its gone... the Dodo is more relevant. Maybe I am just inadequate at explaining it. Everyday since the 80s the computational power has increased exponentially. The Alfa is being used in the next model, its just the latest in the irrigative process of the vehicle development that has been introduced. In nature you would call it evolution, adaption to the environment. Imagine them more evolving to the application, not reused. The relevance of CUSW is that was beginning of the adoption and leveraging of that computational power toward evolved products. There is no flip flopping there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the state of vehicle development at this point of history. The reason it is confusing is because the state of development tools is changing at a accelerated pace also, on becoming obsolete inside a vehicle implementation cycle. The current evolved (I am using this term to help clarify) development process, is already obsolete and will be gone by them time the new Charger is launched. Learn the term Typographic Optimization... in a few year vehicles design will be basically grown based on the inputs.
     
    DAGAR, ScramFan, link3721 and 5 others like this.
  10. Mike V.

    Mike V. Mopar-nac The Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,427
    Likes:
    22,138
    You seem to be a big fan of Hyundai/Kia.

    Mike
     
    T_690 likes this.
  11. LXbuilder

    LXbuilder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,296
    Likes:
    859
    I'm really not trying to be an a__hole here but, I find it really odd that so many people are surprised that some Mopar enthusiasts might feel a little screwed over by yesterday's presentation. FCA all but abandoned Chrysler, Dodge and Fiat yesterday and that is not opinion that is a fact represented by the CEO's own words when he spoke of where resources would be spent in coming years.
    While given the current trends in vehicle sales this is most likely a very smart move on his behalf and for the future success of FCA.
    But if you actually think that it is something that true Mopar fans will be happy to hear you must be confused or believe that Mopar fans are all Jeep/Ram drivers.
    For fans of those brands it's a great day, if Chrysler/Dodge/(Plymouth) were your idea of what "Mopar" was, it was a really sad day.
    Paint it any way you choose but when Dodge cars get left behind in the future on their 20 year old platform, many a Mopar fan will be looking at other brands of enthusiast rides because they want a muscle car, not a truck.
    And the BS story going around sites about "Giorgio" not being able to handle Hemi torque is utter nonsense as the platform was developed in Detroit and Turin (Sergio's previous words), and will still underpin Hemi powered Jeeps.
    Lastly, this site has been my go to place for insider info for more than a decade now and never steered me wrong in the past. But I'm a bit surprised that if this blindsided insiders here, why is it not a big deal? Because it sure is IMO.

    Now I got that off my chest, I'm gonna go have another coffee and enjoy a nice sunny day while trying to clear my head of anything Mopar, Cheers
     
  12. Zagnut27

    Zagnut27 Jeepaholic

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2015
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes:
    10,425
    If I understand what you’re saying, and I won’t pretend that I understand all of it or even most, your use of evolution as the term of choice seems entirely appropriate. My first degree is in Biology, so evolution is something I understand fairly well. Organisms do not simply adapt to their environment, or to a set of factors that are present within a certain time period within their environment. They either have a set of favorable traits that allows them to survive changes to their environment and therefore pass along the genes for their favorable characteristics to their offspring. Those who did not possess those traits do not survive, and therefore do not pass along their genes. Or through mutation of their genetic code, they are able to exhibit a favorable characteristic that allows them to survive and ultimately pass along those mutated genes to their offspring. Keeping in mind that most genetic mutations are not favorable, and may lead to illness or death. I won’t go on and on and bore people to death with this

    Long story short, an organism like a platform may have certain attributes that allow it to be used or adapted for use for other applications. The degree of adaptation can be variable depending on the application. For example, using the basic vertebrate design, look at how many uniquely different animals there are or have been that evolved from that basic design. The degree of possibilities that branched off is mind boggling.
     
  13. Mike V.

    Mike V. Mopar-nac The Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,427
    Likes:
    22,138
    I disagree that Insiders were blindsided. To me it was simply an anticlimactic presentation geared toward investors. The goal of the meeting was to show investors where the most money will be made. It was not geared toward enthusiasts
     
  14. Chris mopar

    Chris mopar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2014
    Messages:
    121
    Likes:
    140
    I try to stay optimistick about FCA plans and I remain so for the Jeep and Ram brands and the luxury brands. However I am a little concerned about Chrysler and Dodge and I could care less about Fiat. It appears to me that Chrysler and Dodge will survive only as long as money can be made on them without having to invest much money on them. I am beginning to wonder if we will ever see a rwd/awd Dodge performance based cuv based on the alpha platform, I can believe the bof Durango because it can be built for very little investment. The Chrysler Pacifica based CUV might make it, once again they won’t have to spend big money on it, beyond these I will believe it when they become official just before production. I believe the predicted Jeep and Ram coming products because those are FCA’s N.A. money brands.
     
    randy1911 likes this.
  15. EVOL

    EVOL Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes:
    1,203
    In all seriousness if they can get a modified LX platform to get the cars below 4000lbs I dont think many will care, I know I won't. I like the ride and seating position of the current cars. Nor do I want some jarring Nurburgring car that'll never see a road course in its life, but will see the drag strip, pot holes and traffic jams.
     
    Mopar392, danbek, MoparJoe and 2 others like this.
  16. freshforged

    freshforged Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,952
    Likes:
    2,485
    The “alpha platform” belongs to GM. The word you are looking for is Giorgio and it belongs to Alfa Romeo of FCA.
     
    UN4GTBL, LXbuilder and T_690 like this.
  17. Ryan

    Ryan Moderator
    Staff Member Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    6,735
    Likes:
    11,766
    My question now would be what is going into Brampton to replace the 300? Is it no longer possible to build a GUS Dodge CUV on the same line as the Charger and Challenger now that we know that they are going to use a heavily re-engineered version of their current architecture? @TripleT

    If this is true, wouldn’t there be a large capacity opening in this plant that would accommodate the 300 without too much work?
     
    ScramFan and randy1911 like this.
  18. TripleT

    TripleT Allpar Legacy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,385
    Likes:
    10,193
    I am only using that term to help people understand the process now. The Engineering team is still guiding the "evolution" with specific goals in mind. Where in the past you would simply be forced to reuse components, now they are evolved... so now that is coming to the end and will be turned inside out, and grown from the start to the application... but that will still be rooted in data leveraged from the previous iterations.
     
    Zagnut27 likes this.
  19. TripleT

    TripleT Allpar Legacy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,385
    Likes:
    10,193
    That is where platform as a pure definition of build points could come it, someone at the plant would know, also the build window. That is also changing a plant simulations are increasing becoming adopted. Of course the current carrier points could be part of the process of even a original product. Ha Ha then there would be complaints that its still on the Diamler platform I suppose. The plant is due for upgrade so perhaps the plant would get some upgrades that function for both.
     
  20. TripleT

    TripleT Allpar Legacy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,385
    Likes:
    10,193
    Free yourself of the platform mentality.... There is no such thing anymore.

    Associate something to a dying market segment, Product X didn't fill the need of dying market Z, therefore product V,W, and Y are bad... Ha Ha you could fill anything in X and the answer is true. Civic, Focus, Fusion, Camry, Accord, 200, Dart...... as long a Z is the Sedan market.

    You using obsolete terms and concepts to try generate negativity.... is this on purpose or do actually believe this. I mean if it fun being incorrect to stir people up ..... please continue and enjoy.
     
    page2171 and ScramFan like this.
  21. TripleT

    TripleT Allpar Legacy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,385
    Likes:
    10,193
    You all still keep using platform like it is 1985. That is the only reason that it Fishy, Gplatitude is already obsolete.

     
    page2171, ScramFan and link3721 like this.

Share This Page

Loading...
 We are not affiliated with FCA. We make no claims regarding validity or accuracy of information or advice. Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.