AF: HORNET 360 OR DUSTER 340??? | Allpar Forums
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

HORNET 360 OR DUSTER 340???

Discussion in 'A Body: Duster, Valiant, Dart, etc' started by Fast Eddie, Dec 16, 2019.

  1. Fast Eddie

    Fast Eddie Valued Member
    Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    2,193
    Likes:
    2,527
  2. Fast Eddie

    Fast Eddie Valued Member
    Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    2,193
    Likes:
    2,527
  3. CudaPete

    Level 2 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    4,969
    Likes:
    700
    Interesting comparison. Both are cool cars but more likely their 6 cyl varients would face off on the street back in the day.
     
  4. voiceofstl

    voiceofstl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes:
    1,212
    Don;t know much about amc cars...were they competive to chevelles and road runners?
     
  5. paullybob

    paullybob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    531
    Likes:
    108
    Buddy of mine had one back in the 80's, we started a 401 engine swap one summer and as teenage boys are apt to do, left it there to turn to rust. The car was light and even with the 360, was pretty quick, catching the Chevelles and even a few Camoros sitting at the light. The 3 speed was the kiss of death, the true muscle cars didn't take long to come roaring by, lol!!
     
    Volunteer and valiant67 like this.
  6. valiant67

    valiant67 ...

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    36,683
    Likes:
    19,438
    Today they make 4 doors with coupe like styling.
    This Hornet was a 2 door with 4 door sedan styling. But yet it still makes a fine looking car.
     
  7. valiant67

    valiant67 ...

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    36,683
    Likes:
    19,438
    The three speed offered a couple of benefits. First, it was slightly cheaper so it made for a lower priced car. Second, insurance companies apparently rated a car with a 4 speed a higher risk so you might save on insurance with a 3 speed manual - and insurance costs were part of what killed the original muscle car.
     
    Bearhawke likes this.
  8. LouJC

    LouJC Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes:
    892
    We had an AMC/Jeep dealer in my town when I was a teenager in addition to the Chevrolet and Ford stores on opposite sides of the same street. I used to stop in there to see some of the interesting AMC muscle cars and the SJ Wagoneers. Articles like that one make me miss the fun and inexpensive muscle cars we grew up with and kind of took for granted. Now all we see is a sea of look-a-like Asian CUVs that literally turns my stomach. Thank GOD for DODGE still making excitement.
     
    Volunteer and paullybob like this.
  9. DC-93

    DC-93 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2014
    Messages:
    3,177
    Likes:
    2,071
    My 1974, 198, 3 on the tree, 3.55 geared Dart Swinger beat a Maverick with whatever 6 banger Ford offered back then.

    :cool:
     
  10. Bearhawke

    Bearhawke Things happen for a reason

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    13,909
    Likes:
    532
    Exactly!

    Body style as well; a two door Chevy Impala with the 427-425 HP engine/4 spd combo was $$$ for insurance; yet a four door big chevy with that identical drivetrain was considered to be a 'family sedan'.
     
    Volunteer and RalphP like this.
  11. CudaPete

    Level 2 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    4,969
    Likes:
    700
    What rear axle, 8.25? Back in the day my friend had a 70 Valiant 225 /6, 7.25 rear with 3.23 gears. It was surprisingly quick. The Holley 1920 responded well to a larger jet and cleaning up the casting. He put in a high energy coil, opened up the plugs to 0.045", and set the ignition timing to 5 BTD. That's all it would take before pinging. It was an oddly optioned car: 225, A904 Automatic, P/S, and the 3.23 rear gears. Otherwise, bench seat, rubber floor, and radio delete.
     
  12. 68RT

    68RT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,998
    Likes:
    729
    No matter how good the AMC running gear was, the Duster body was a better body. (Didn't have tapered axles too).
     
  13. DC-93

    DC-93 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2014
    Messages:
    3,177
    Likes:
    2,071
    Never looked. In 1974 the 3:55 was standard on a 198 3 speed. I could get a good squawk hitting 2nd!
     
  14. Locomotion

    Locomotion Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    270
    Likes:
    7
    Using new 1971 models, the April 1971 issue of Car Craft magazine had a direct comparison of a Demon 340 and a Hornet s/c 360. I wish I could remember a few more details, but the Demon won.
     
  15. Skinpine

    Skinpine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    76
    Likes:
    111
    Just my opinion on subjects above.

    The 340 was a great engine, strong and was the basis for NASCAR engines. It was also powerful. It would be my choice over the AMC 360.

    As far a the 6 cylinder competition. Any light body (Valiant etc.) with the 225 manual ran well, AMC with the 258 ran well. Ford with the 200 six was a good engine but a little slower than the previous two. Pontiac OHC six would outrun them all, the Sprint version was even faster. Most all of them were slower after about 1970 when smog regs. kicked in.

    The 225 Slant Six had a good reputation in that era. They were tough, ran well and fairly efficient. My father had a 69 Dart 2dr. hardtop that to this day is one of my favorite cars I have driven. It had a torque flight with 225, drove nice and to my eyes, looked good.
     

Share This Page

Loading...
 We are not affiliated with FCA. We make no claims regarding validity or accuracy of information or advice. Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.