AF: WL - Hurricane or no Hurricane? (Market sizing/speculation) | Page 3 | Allpar Forums
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

WL - Hurricane or no Hurricane? (Market sizing/speculation)

Discussion in 'Mopar / FCA News' started by cygnus, Sep 11, 2017.

  1. Roadram

    Roadram Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    15
    Likes:
    19
    I still like the 2.2. Simple, easy to work on. Could be a bit rough but so what.
     
    Citation84 likes this.
  2. Adventurer55

    Adventurer55 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    3,338
    Likes:
    4,343
    I believe their engine family before especially the former 2.4 was better. Remember, Fiat is/was still making the 1.6 litre version of it.
     
  3. Mallard

    Mallard Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    453
    Likes:
    397
    A naturally aspirated V6 as a luxury option against a turbo 4? No way.
     
  4. Ryan

    Staff Member Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    6,893
    Likes:
    12,347
    It's not an unreasonable idea. If the turbo 4 cylinder in the updated KL is tuned more toward efficiency than power and makes, say, 200 horsepower, there's still plenty of room for a V6 at the top of the lineup.
     
    suzq044 likes this.
  5. serpens

    serpens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes:
    1,115
    They desperately need an efficiency motor so I'd definitely be OK with that.
     
  6. Mallard

    Mallard Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    453
    Likes:
    397
    When you have a base 4 cylinder with ~185HP, you're not going to be able to upsell a customer to a 200HP turbo for thousands more. Look at the competition. If it's not at least 250HP it won't be competitive. You can offer two versions of the turbo 4, one with a hotter tune, and that would be more effective than adding a wheezy N/A V6 with less torque than the 4. The Pentastar is the 'value' engine. The turbo 4 is typically more expensive to produce, so they will need to be able to charge the customer more for it.
     
  7. Dave Z

    Dave Z It's me, Dave
    Staff Member Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2001
    Messages:
    34,946
    Likes:
    20,644
    Let's say...

    base four cylinder: 185 hp
    turbo four: 260 hp
    V6: 286 hp (3.6 not 3.2)

    Americans often prefer more cylinders, e.g. the original Honda Accord V6 which wasn't any faster than the four.
     
    UN4GTBL and suzq044 like this.
  8. Ryan

    Staff Member Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    6,893
    Likes:
    12,347
    Eh, I was thinking that the 2.4 could just be eliminated from the lineup completely leaving the 2.0 and Pentastar as the only engines. Would help move the Cherokee slightly upmarket to separate it from the Compass.
     
  9. suzq044

    suzq044 Resident Photoshop Nerd

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    7,928
    Likes:
    6,857
    I thought the 2.4 was going away once these hurricanes finally get here

    (it feels weird writing about hurricanes with the storms that just wreaked havoc over here, in fla and in texas, with more on the way, apparently)
     
    Citation84 and Zagnut27 like this.
  10. Ryan

    Staff Member Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2016
    Messages:
    6,893
    Likes:
    12,347
    I thought so too. I was under the impression that the 2.4 would be replaced by more efficiency-tuned versions of the Hurricane while higher performance versions of the same engine would replace the Pentastar.
     
    suzq044 likes this.
  11. wilbur

    wilbur Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes:
    1,226
    I am sure the 2.4L will be used as the new Hurricanes will implemented as the model lines are updated in the oncoming years. First with the Wrangler,
     
    suzq044 likes this.
  12. TripleT

    TripleT Allpar Legacy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,385
    Likes:
    10,193
    Where did you hear 260... I am hearing much more that that.
     
  13. Dave Z

    Dave Z It's me, Dave
    Staff Member Level III Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2001
    Messages:
    34,946
    Likes:
    20,644
    Just a guess for the NON-SRT version — the one with MultiAir — designed for economy rather than power. I'd been hearing 280 hp for that one and “over 300” for the other. Generally the final production version has less power than in development, for various reasons. In some cases it's been a huge difference (Apache) and in other cases the final version has been “as advertised” (Hellcat).
     
  14. MJAB

    MJAB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2013
    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes:
    3,951
    In FCA investor presentation for powertrains it is shown that there will be different versions with different power output, naturally aspirated and turbocharged.

    In a slide are divided as "value", "efficiency" and "performance".
    Each version will be used for different vehicles to meet the target capacities needed.

    For NAFTA FCA projected to increase the share of 4 cylinders from 27% of 2013 to 48% in 2018, while 6 cylinders engines going from 52% to 40% and 8 cylinders from 21% to 12%.
     
    cygnus likes this.
  15. Adventurer55

    Adventurer55 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    3,338
    Likes:
    4,343
    I sure hope they are sharp enough to realize much has changed since 2013. These days, four years is an eternity in the automotive world.
     
  16. cygnus

    cygnus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2014
    Messages:
    917
    Likes:
    969
    not sure what you're getting at. The 2018 % is a little high, reality might be a bit lower, but they are on target from my analysis.

    The highest volume vehicles (Grand Cherokee, Wrangler, Compass) will all have four cylinder engines.
     
  17. Adventurer55

    Adventurer55 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    3,338
    Likes:
    4,343
    All I was getting at is, don't be in such a big hurry to start ridding yourself of V6 and V8 engines. Inline sixes won't fit east to west front drivers and we've been down this road before. They were caught with no RWD cars and phased out all V8s. They were on their way to eliminating full size trucks as well, but fortunately Cummins showed up and the rest is history.
     
  18. Mallard

    Mallard Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    453
    Likes:
    397
    We live in a world where the largest automotive market (China) is talking about a complete ban on internal combustion vehicles, the US has increasing emissions standards that will be impossible to meet without electrification, and several Euro cities are looking at having ICE-free city centers. Which powertrain decision will be seen as short cited in the future?
     
    Ryan likes this.
  19. Mike V.

    Mike V. Mopar-nac The Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,427
    Likes:
    22,139
    Depends on vehicle and configuration.

    Nothing wrong with being conservative now ;)

    Mike
     
  20. unverferth

    unverferth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes:
    1,149
    Forgive me but the 3.6 Pentastar is going to be around for a while longer. Right ? Finally a wonderful engine.....and to be replaced with a 4 cylinder ? I am just not a fan of 4 bangers......turbo'd or not.
     
    UN4GTBL likes this.

Share This Page

Loading...
 We are not affiliated with FCA. We make no claims regarding validity or accuracy of information or advice. Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.