That is what I thought too. But the manufacturers tolerances may have a big effect on how close to perfect they get. All the component pulleys look just like your pictures. I did take a look at the old idler pulleys (they do not have grooves or side flanges) to see if I could tell where the belt had been running on them. Both show the belt off to one side. there is a .100" wide area on inner side, a .030" on the outer side, so the belt had been running towards outer side of the pulleys. The pulleys are .960" wide, and the belt is .825" wide. The one by the alternator is the worst, the other one is about flush with the outside of the pulley. I am thinking about putting a .030" shim under the one by the alternator. I checked everything before I did any work on changing the components. This could be problem with the bearings getting worn on the alternator, or the belt is unevenly stressed, maybe not the best quality. It's a Gates belt but quality from all the companies we used to use for quality, aren't what they used to be. The Gates kit was made in Mexico. If I showed you the 2 belts, the original one 13 years old and 165,000 miles to compare with the new Gates belt, I bet you would pick the old belt as the new belt. It looks pristine, the Gates belt looks like junk compared to it.
Thanks for your input, do you see any problem with me putting a .030" shim under the one idler pulley to make the belt run on the centerline of the pulley?
Lon Johnston