Allpar Forums banner

A look at the Carter BBS and BBD Carburetors

12251 1
A look at the Carter BBS and BBD Carburetors

by David Zatz; most photos courtesy of auto parts seller DJD16

Chrysler Corporation's Carl Breer worked with the Ball family, father and son, to build better carburetors; the benefits of their research went to any buyer of Ball & Ball carburetors. When the Ball family sold their company to Carter Carburetor in the late 1940s, their products were dubbed the Carter BB series (BB standing for Ball & Ball).

Technology Machine Metal Cylinder Gas


In the 1950s, two new carburetors were created based on that design, the Carter BBS and BBD series, essentially updated versions of the BB with single or dual "barrels."

A carburetor barrel is a chamber where air rushes in, to hopefully mix with metered fuel; a venturi, or a narrowed area, increases the speed of the air and fuel. The two barrels can either work together, at once, or have "progressive" opening, where one barrel is used for most work, and a second one opens when needed. Most four barrels are progressive - they use two barrels most of the time, and open the others for hard acceleration - while the Carter BBD two-barrel had both barrels identically sized and opening at the same time.

Auto part Machine Automotive engine part Engine Automotive super charger part


Hemi Andersen noted that the main departure from the BB to BBD was using dual barrels; it also used metering rods rather than a fixed fuel metering jet to deal with all engine loads and speeds, except idle. The BBS came later, a single-barrel carburetor that took advantage of the BBD's updates. Both were Chrysler standbys for many years, used on slant sixes (BBS) and small V8s (BBD).

Black-and-white Monochrome photography Monochrome Transmission part Automotive engine part


For the 1977 Volare and Aspen, Carter adapted the BBD to the Slant Six. The new BBD-8087 was created mainly by cutting down its size so the smaller engines wouldn't get too much fuel at once and "bog."

In the same year, the 318's BBD gained a mixture adjustment for higher altitudes, which could be set from the top of the carburetor; this was only used on cars sold in high-altitude areas, and was replaced in 1982 by a separate mechanism.

Text Red Line Font Brand


Technology Machine Metal Cylinder Gas


These photos make it clear that the BBD had identically sized barrels and venturis. You can see the white plastic adjustment caps on the two screws that controlled the "idle mixture" - the amount of fuel that was mixed with air on idle.

Product Technology Line Machine Black


The other two screws, seen in the above photo on the left, controlled the engine idle speed when the engine was warm and cold. They were screwed in or out to rest on a cam, which moved as the engine warmed up. The cam was hooked up to a mechanical thermometer, that is, a strip made of two metals that expanded differently as they were heated. That caused the metal to bend more or less, pulling the cam; but the cam would only move when the screw was not resting on it, so the driver would press the gas (so the screw would move up, letting the cam turn), start the car, wait a few moments for it to warm a little, then press the gas lightly (to let the cam turn back a little), and start driving. As the driver pressed the gas, the cam could turn again until the engine was warm, and finally the second screw rested against a flat part of the cam - that was the warm idle speed. These are best shown in the black and white "Super Six" carburetor illustrations above.

Green Machine Technology Gas Metal


In 1979, the BBD used on the slant six was made "tamper proof" by concealing the idle mixture screws, using a plug during the final factory adjustment. Dealers would have to remove the plugs, change the mixture, and, though many probably skipped this step, replace the plugs. This replaced the earlier idle mixture limiters.

Technology Line Machine Font Engine


The final Chrysler use of Carter BBD carburetors was in the 1984 cars. For 1985, Chrysler switched to Holley - but only because Carter had stopped making carburetors.

The various Carter serious, except some of the later four-barrels, still have a strong reputation for reliability and durability today.

We strive for accuracy but we are not necessarily experts or authorities on the subject. Neither the author nor Allpar.com / Allpar, LLC may be held responsible for the use of the information or advice, implied or otherwise, on this site. This page is offered "as is" and without warranties. By reading further, you release the author and Allpar, LLC from any liability.


Home
Engines
Reviews
Chrysler 1904-2018
Upcoming
Trucks
Cars

Spread the word via <!--Tweet or--> Facebook!

We make no guarantees regarding validity or accuracy of information, predictions, or advice - .
Copyright © VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved. Dodge, Jeep, Chrysler, Ram, and Mopar are trademarks of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

1 - 2 of 2 Posts

·
Valued Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
Back in the day (1970's and 1980's) Carter and Holley had full time engineers (Marty Fuchs for Carter and Gary Congdon for Holley) on sight at Highland Park for doing any carburetor development on any engine. Dyno testing would be done and then the carb would go to the carb lab and either Gary or Marty would do a modification depending on the previous results and this would be repeated over and over again until the desired results were obtained. The Slant Six was always the hardest because of it's manifold design. Sometimes the tops of manifolds were machined off and plexiglass windows were installed so the fuel flow could be visually watched and photographed. If carb adjustments didn't fix a problem we would installed popsicle sticks on the floor of the manifold with 5 minute epoxy to try to drive the fuel to a certain runner or port. If that fixed the problem a casting change would be made to the manifold for production. We used Fuel/Air analyzers to determine the fuel/air ratio at each cylinder and sometimes we monitored the exhaust port temperature at each cylinder to help determine how rich or lean the engine was running. Because of the test equipment available back then it was a very tedious and time consuming operation.
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top