Allpar Forums banner

Added: 1960-1983

476 Views 13 Replies 4 Participants Last post by  Dave Z
This is an addition. Any contributions would be appreciated.


The first step is the MARKET PLAN.

In the 1950's the automobile market was simple as was Chrysler's MARKET and PRODUCT PLAN:

- Plymouth and Dodge competed with Chevrolet and Ford.

- Chrysler competed with B-O-P (Buick, Oldsmobile, Pontiac).

- Imperial was there (sometimes) but didn't really compete with anybody. It was a car for dealer's wives and their wealthy friends.

When Lynn Townsend took over as CEO in 1962 he articulated a revised market plan:

- Plymouth competes with Chevrolet and Ford.

- Dodge competes with Pontiac.

In 1968 I was appointed Chief Engineer and Product Planning Manager for Dodge cars. Lynn called me to his office - congratulated me - and told me to "think Pontiac". This is NOT what the Dodge Dealers wanted! They wanted to compete with Chevrolet and Ford - and Plymouth. Lynn told the Dodge dealers that they were not going to tell us how to run our business and that if they didn't like the Dodge franchise to quit and get one that did like. I was there when he told this to the Dodge National Dealer Council.

- Chrysler competes with Buick and Oldsmobile.

- Imperial struggled on. It was in the product lineup but there was no money for a merchandising plan. It had it's own unique platform and body in 1957 but it wasn't profitable and "soaked up" technical and financial resources which the Corporation did not have. Imperial was on a road to oblivion.

While I was Director of Product Planning, we (Product Planning) tried twice to break away from this "me to" market plan:

1. Our market research studies showed that the "A" Body Valiant/Dart and "B" Body Belvedere/Coronet four door buyers had the same demographics (age, gender, income, education, etc.) so we proposed that the new 1976 "F" body replace both the "A" and "B" body sedans and wagons. That idea was rejected by Sales Management. They said that to do their job they had to have counterpoint product entries to Chevrolet and Ford; i.e. they had to have both compact and intermediate models. Consequently, the 1976 "F" Body designs became Aspen and Volare replacements for Valiant and Dart and the Coronet and Belvedere 4 door models continued in the product lineup.

2. In the early and mid-1970s, our Advance Design, Advance Engineering, and Advance Product Planning offices planned and designed first generation versions of a mini-van. The program objective was to design a station wagon type vehicle that was not derived from another vehicle; i.e. not from a passenger car sedan or a commercial van. The first generation designs were rear wheel drive because we did not have front wheel drive engines or transmissions. Product planners, designers, and engineers were enthusiastic about the mini-van (which we called a "garageable van") concept but were unable to get management approval to go forward with a unique product which had a special tooling bill, not including facilities, of millions of dollars. Consequently, the first designs never went beyond the clay model, advanced design and seating buck stage - but the interest in the concept in the Design and Product Planning offices at Chrysler continued.
Chrysler management didn't approve the minivan program in the early 1970s because GM and Ford didn't have one. Top management's contention was that, if there was a market, GM and Ford would be building one.
Management was, without articulating it, confirming that our product strategy was to get 15 to 20% of market segments established by GM and Ford. As Director of Product Planning for seven years, that was a painful realization to me.

In 1977 the Chrysler market and product strategy changed because it was clear that Chrysler could not succeed - or probably even "survive" - continuing to design and build products for markets established by GM and Ford. Chrysler management decided to add a 4 door subcompact to the USA product lineup. They did this by revising the new (in 1978) Chrysler European FWD C2 design (Chrysler Horizon) for build in the USA. Initially, this required purchasing FWD engines and manual transaxles from VW because Chrysler Europe did not have productive capacity for FWD powertrain components. It also required designing/tooling/building an automatic FWD transaxle in the USA because it didn't exist in Europe.

Then - Henry Ford II got rid of two talented automobile executives. Hal Sperlich came to Chrysler in 1977 and Lee Iacocca came in 1978. These men were product savvy and provided the leadership to get Chrysler out of the "graveyard spiral" that they were in. With Hal and Lee onboard Chrysler started doing "it's own thing".

In the product arena Lee and Hal should get credit for the following new products:

- "K" car. The design was based on FWD components.

- "K" car convertible. Lee wanted the convertible even though Sales, Manufacturing and Engineering didn't. The detail design work and the first year's production was done by Cars and Concepts - a vehicle conversion company - in Howell, MI. Demand was so great that C and C's could not meet it and we had to redesign it for in house (St. Louis Plant) build. Lee was right!

- Mini-van. Hal and Lee should get credit for the final FWD design execution of the mini-van and the decision to go ahead with the investment and production of this unique product - but not the idea.

Sometimes Lee wasn't right:

- "L" Body FWD pickup truck. I think we called it "Scamp". It did not sell.

- "K" Body derived Chrysler's - including New Yorker. We called them "E" Body vehicles. They did not sell in volume because they were too narrow ("K" Body OAW).

- !981-1983 Imperial. Lee said "how can you be in the car business without a luxury entry?" So - we did a unique skin Imperial coupe introduced in 1981. By January 1983 we hadn't sold 15,000 Imperials in 2 ½ years so in January 1983 Lee said "kill the S.O.B." Then he said "don't bring this idea up again!"

I went to Japan in 1983 and I retired in 1987 so I lost track of the Chrysler market and product plan.

In summary, while I was there, it went from "compete with GM and Ford" (1960's and 70's) to "do our own thing under direction from Hal and Lee" (1980 until the merger with Mercedes).
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

· What color are the clouds in your world?
3,864 Posts
I cannot add anything. Bowkamp done good!

· What color are the clouds in your world?
3,864 Posts
Very cool! Good images to go with the article.

· What color are the clouds in your world?
3,864 Posts
I read the public article. I still cannot think of anything to add.

I still think he did a great job!

1,249 Posts
Excellent Article ! Someone Knows the Real Inside History. I Was Always on the "Tail End" of All the Decisions.
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.