I sympathize, however rightly or wrongly, great cars and near misses, happened because of one missing or added ingredient.b1c said:While I understand the sentiment, as a "bean counter" and a Mopar enthusiast, I have a slight resentment to that statement .....
Well of course, and ain't that the issue. It becomes a derogatory term, when in reality, like anything else the problem ONLY comes in when there is an obsessive focus. When the bean counters decide their perspective is the only one that matters, and cannot understand the long term effects is when you have issues. As usual, when there is a better shared understanding, that's when they are best. It ensures the engineers put more thought into the cost effectiveness of a program, and keeps the focus so that the company can make money.Mike V. said:Like em or not, they serve a purpose.
I still don't understand the three sea shells!Mike V. said:Without the engineers you can't have the bean counters. Without the bean counters you can't have the engineers. Everyone has their place.
It's only derogatory if it offends and life isn't fair. We don't live in a utopian world where everyone is happy and unoffended. Dr Cocteau isn't running the country *yet* so there is no Verbal Morality Statute to fine me one credit. The San Angeles Police aren't coming for me yet.
That could be. Of course, one can hope that a number of factors could bring down the raw price of gas, and they would use that opportunity to slip in said tax hikesjimboy said:While I do understand the purpose of bean counters, going to the trouble of certifying the diesel for the GC and not the Durango doesn't make a lick of sense to me. While the V-6 pentastar is reputedly a great engine, (I have yet to drive one), a diesel in the Durango would up its appeal by a factor of 10, IMO. Diesel trucks and cars are very popular here in Canada due to their torque and range.
Us Canucks travel great distances in our vehicles and gasoline is much more expensive in Canada than the US, thus diesel's popularity here. While Americans may not like it, sooner or later you're going to see some real tax increases in gasoline, if only to pay for your increasing deficits. I'm not playing politics here, just stating a fact of the future.
Offering diesel or CNG capable engines puts Chrysler Group ahead of the game instead of behind the 8 ball, as they have so often been.
If you're speaking of fracking or shale oil, you may be right. But, remember that Canada already sells it's bitumen to the US at a $20 per barrel discount.(West Texas light crude) Right now that works out to about $75 -$77 per barrel.bumonbox said:That could be. Of course, one can hope that a number of factors could bring down the raw price of gas, and they would use that opportunity to slip in said tax hikes
My sister commented that she sees TONS of advertising for the Dart. Maybe it's just being advertised in specific markets? I know I've seen a few Dart ads when I'm out to eat, too. Usually the Pastrana one and the registry ad.AC TC said:The "D" seems to be picking up sales without any sales promotion from mother.
Can it be true what they at GM inside news forum says that its a good car that nobody tries to sell?
Are the customers finding it by themselfes....
If so it should be a diesel candidate.. free headlines!
Does "D" mean "Dart" or "Durango"?suzq044 said:My sister commented that she sees TONS of advertising for the Dart. Maybe it's just being advertised in specific markets? I know I've seen a few Dart ads when I'm out to eat, too. Usually the Pastrana one and the registry ad.