.
Chrysler has revealed the 2015 300, 300S, and 300C, the company’s flagship cars (even if their prices are equalled by their own minivans).
![]()
All 300s get an eight-speed automatic, but none get the 6.4 liter engine used in the …
Continue reading...
Sorry Bob! The original Chrysler 300 from 1955 had the Imperial grill in it which nicely corresponds with the 2005 Chrysler 300. The large grill opening continued even more in the 1957 300 (I owned a '56 and '57 model 300's) through the '59 model (I owned two). To my personal opinion the '60 300 F had the nicest design for the grill and the accompanying body style. In any case, Audi did not come up with anything. Chrysler was following a trend of design cues starting in 1955 and polished it up for 2005. Maybe you aren't old enough.Chrysler stole the new look from Audi - not the other way around!
There are still 2014 hemi/AWD combos on dealer lots. Do a search, spring for one now. I did, and couldn't be happier with my charger.I just read this on Motor Trend.
"All-wheel drive is available with the V-6 only."
Really? The one phenomenal feature of the LX cars was the combination of V8 and AWD. I somewhat (tried) to understand AWD/V8 being dropped since Dodge is being repositioned/focused into a more performance division. Both the Charger and 300 have been on my shopping list for a new car next year just for this combination. (Sadly) I guess they'll be marked off now.
Is there a design issue with the new 8-speed trans that it can't handle the V8/AWD combination?
And/or will that combination be offered at a later time?
Noticed those early on...nice touches evrywhere. Gotta give all those hard working folk some credit here. They've come through big in my opinion...details.![]()
Following the easter eggs of the Challenger and Charger grilles for 2015, Chrysler follows suit with the 300S grille... Chrysler wings...
EXACTLY! It's our history, guys!Sorry Bob! The original Chrysler 300 from 1955 had the Imperial grill in it which nicely corresponds with the 2005 Chrysler 300. The large grill opening continued even more in the 1957 300 (I owned a '56 and '57 model 300's) through the '59 model (I owned two). To my personal opinion the '60 300 F had the nicest design for the grill and the accompanying body style. In any case, Audi did not come up with anything. Chrysler was following a trend of design cues starting in 1955 and polished it up for 2005. Maybe you aren't old enough.
Lol...he probably jumped up while pulling out hair on head, running and screaming through a closed door!E post 1084644675 said:Current Camry looks like a 2015 Charger knock-off, without any benefit of being a Dodge Charger. I am not sure a typical Camry buyer wants a mundane "a to b" Toyota this aggressive. I had a Camry driver tell me way back in 2007 that the new Camry "was too aggressive" - I'd love to hear that guys thoughts on this one...
![]()
Yes! a beautiful ride. The 300 C is looking very luxo for 2015. Love that big grille too. This is essentially a New Yorker ( a name I honestly prefer)Oh I dont dissagree that they might look similar now..... But our 300 is a clear evolution for mthe original 2005
we were the first to use the BIG BOLD GRILL..... Audi didnt take that look untill I think around 2008....
It's got tusks... WTF?Every time I see a new Toyota design, I see effort in desperation instead of confidence.
Yesterday, Toyota revealed its ugliest car to date: the upcoming fuel cell car to be called Mirai --Japanese for "future".
The biggest things on this car are the front overhangs. It may be an engineering marvel, but Toyota is blind to believe people are going to like this thing.
![]()
That matches perfectly with my headphones lol.I had our self professed "Photshop nerd" Suzq044 add some color to the 2015 interior...... all I can say is MMMMMM MMMMM!!! I love saddle!!! Now if only they made a Phantom Black C with the S wheels in Black Chrome and it is on!!!!
![]()
By this, do you mean the 2007-10 "WTF" Compass, or the "WTF" Caliber?The Germans at least knew how to make Chrysler stand apart in styling from any of the competition!
Lord Vader, your ship has arrived![/QUOTE]QUOTE="suzq044, post: 1084644728, member: 25432"]![]()
I still think it looks better in Dark colors rather than red.
If it were a turd with wheels, I know a lot of toyota buyers who'd line up for one.It's got tusks... WTF?
I like the looks of the patriot. I found it hard to resist getting one. I'd agree, they are gone more SUV/CUV shaped like everything else on the road. Kind of lost the Jeep-y-ness look. The 4 cyl engine and CVT is what made my mind up on the patriot, I'll pass. Wish it had a V6 and at least select trac II.My daughter was with me at the dealership yesterday. She looked at the KL and said, are they kidding? "It's Ugly and stupid, Jeeps are supposed to be square" She is still shaking her head. We were looking to replace her Patriot, she rejected everything on the lot and started looking at Wranglers. She may end up with another Patriot, as she rejected Compass, Grand Cherokee, KL and ended up pretty disappointed.