Joined
·
14,401 Posts
Nice concept, in theory, but so far he hasn't been able to prove the theory in practice. Quality issues, production delays, missed deadlines, late launches, all tell me that the "old antiquated methods" weren't so bad when it came to results.
Rhetoric only takes us so far, and "talking new" is just that, talk.
Some processes are ages old for one simple reason, they worked, modernization is good, as long as it works and produces a profit.
New to be new is meaningless if the new way of conducting business is inferior to the old.
The jury remains out..
The success he has produced to date is the result of improved build quality and styling improvements to old products, not about any paradigm shift.
Rhetoric only takes us so far, and "talking new" is just that, talk.
Some processes are ages old for one simple reason, they worked, modernization is good, as long as it works and produces a profit.
New to be new is meaningless if the new way of conducting business is inferior to the old.
The jury remains out..
The success he has produced to date is the result of improved build quality and styling improvements to old products, not about any paradigm shift.