[Jeepnut]

Um guys US Promaster pricing was released back in the begining of March and was covered here on Allpar.

Edit: Heres the link.
http://www.allpar.com/forums/topic/148715-an-ram-promaster-prices-contest/

 

[RVC]

Really? LOL!

 

[Dave Z]

D'oh! It's not on the Ram web site.

 

[Dave Z]

THANK YOU for pointing this out and providing a link.

I have updated the story with a couple of American price points and comparisons (finding out that it's Freightliner Sprinter again!) and will get our ProMaster page updated with all sorts of info later.

Still a good story the old one did not mention Sprinter. Ford Transit is really the big one but I'm not up for that right now.

 

[Jeepnut]

No problem Dave. Im very interested in how Promaster pricing compares to the Transit. It looks like my job is gonna keep me on the road for a few more years so im actually in the market for one of these vans.

Edit: The Sprinter is also available in the US as a Mercedes. I just looked at one the other day. It was a 2013 2500 144" WB high roof with an unbelievable 53K price tag!

 

[Cornupenuria]

The Sprinters on the lot at the dealer in Omaha all had Mercedes grilles a few weeks ago. I don't drive through that neighborhood very often.

 

[LeeRyder]

So I guess this answers the question: At what price, ugly?

 

[Jeepnut]

The Sprinters on the lot at the dealer in Omaha all had Mercedes grilles a few weeks ago. I don't drive through that neighborhood very often.

Yep and both Freightshaker and the three pointed star of satan are advertising the all new 2014 Sprinter so it looks to be a dual make model for the forseable future.

So I guess this answers the question: At what price, ugly?

Yes I will agree the Promaster front clip is ugly but now that im actually in the market for one of these vans for work I find I dont care anymore. Im more interested in cost, capability, and reliability. IMHO the Promaster actually looks pretty good from the a pillar back. Even the FWD is starting to make a case for itself as I sometimes end up in areas with the possibility of decent snow accumulation.

 

[UN4GTBL]

Yep and both Freightshaker and the three pointed star of satan are advertising the all new 2014 Sprinter so it looks to be a dual make model for the forseable future.

Yes I will agree the Promaster front clip is ugly but now that im actually in the market for one of these vans for work I find I dont care anymore. Im more interested in cost, capability, and reliability. IMHO the Promaster actually looks pretty good from the a pillar back. Even the FWD is starting to make a case for itself as I sometimes end up in areas with the possibility of decent snow accumulation.

Oh man, I love that!

Going to add that to my dumbler and dbag names for them

 

[Jeepnut]

Thank you ill take a bow for that one :lol:

 

[ccrider77]

I was a excited that Ram was going to have a full-size van again. My aging B150, as nice as it is will eventually have to be replaced. I was hoping Fiat would re-badge & re-style the Daily, which IMHO is the better van. Plus the Daily is available in 4WD in Europe. Sadly I'm disappointed by the ProMaster, which to me not only has a front clip only AMC could love, but without a window/passenger version and with a front-drive layout and no V8 option for such a large vehicle is a deal breaker. I need something that can haul passengers in comfort, haul motorcycles, pull a trailer, building materials, camp in and have enough power to pull a trailer over the Grapevine at the speed limit without any problems.

 

[Dave Z]

When I went to the Mercedes site to find Sprinters, they directed me to the Freightliner site. I took that as meaning something

I think Daily will be available. I also think Promaster might really be the better van for you, depending on the trailer weight, with the diesel. It arguably doesn't need the V8 because it has much lower weight than the Daily. (Sprinter, by the way, has no V8 option as far as I know.)

Not sure why front wheel drive would be a deal breaker for you. It has less than 300 horsepower and you're not going offroad, right?

 

[Jeepnut]

Heres the link to the Mercedes sprinter site.
http://mbsprinterusa.com/

I was a excited that Ram was going to have a full-size van again. My aging B150, as nice as it is will eventually have to be replaced. I was hoping Fiat would re-badge & re-style the Daily, which IMHO is the better van. Plus the Daily is available in 4WD in Europe. Sadly I'm disappointed by the ProMaster, which to me not only has a front clip only AMC could love, but without a window/passenger version and with a front-drive layout and no V8 option for such a large vehicle is a deal breaker. I need something that can haul passengers in comfort, haul motorcycles, pull a trailer, building materials, camp in and have enough power to pull a trailer over the Grapevine at the speed limit without any problems.

None of the new euro style vans have a V8 option. The diesels have effectively taken over that space. One of the reasons im looking at the Promaster/Transit vans is because my job keeps me on the road alot and I want to be able to carry my tool box, motorcycle, and camping gear ect.... all locked up inside the van out away from thieves and weather.
The two things that concern me with the Promater are the torque on the diesel seems to be low. The other would be ive read that the high roof version comes wirh that full bulkhead seperating the passenger and cargo areas. If thats true then its an automatic deal breaker for me.

 

[Dave Z]

Keeping in mind --

318 V8, 1972: 150 hp - 260 lb-ft
318 V8, 1978: 140 hp - 245 lb-ft
440 V8, 1978: 190 hp - 305 lb-ft

Diesel V6, 2013: 174 hp - 295 lb-ft
Gasol V6, 2013: 280 hp - 258 lb-ft

In short, today's V6 gasoline engine easily beats the 1978 318 V8 in both horsepower and torque, while clobbering the 1972 318 in horsepower and matching it in torque.

Today's low-end Fiat diesel clobbers the 318 V8s of the past in both horsepower and torque, period, and comes awfully close to the 1978 440 in torque.

 

[Stratuscaster]

An observation - locally in media ads for local dealers, "Sprinter" is often mentioned as a separate brand. As in "come see your Chicagoland Mercedes/Smart/Sprinter dealer today."

 

[Cornupenuria]

Keeping in mind --

318 V8, 1972: 150 hp - 260 lb-ft
318 V8, 1978: 140 hp - 245 lb-ft
440 V8, 1978: 190 hp - 305 lb-ft

Diesel V6, 2013: 174 hp - 295 lb-ft
Gasol V6, 2013: 280 hp - 258 lb-ft

In short, today's V6 gasoline engine easily beats the 1978 318 V8 in both horsepower and torque, while clobbering the 1972 318 in horsepower and matching it in torque.

Today's low-end Fiat diesel clobbers the 318 V8s of the past in both horsepower and torque, period, and comes awfully close to the 1978 440 in torque.

I thought my '66 440 had 325 hp and 480 lb-ft. It had sometining like 11.5:1 compression and an 1100 cfm carburetor. It was in a Dodge Monaco sedan. It was a bear to feed: 12 mpg at 65 mph 9 mpg at 80+ mph; premium gas. It had the 3.24:1 rear axle and would have gotten better mileage with the 2.76:1 rear axle.

 

[valiant67]

Though I am sure sales to fleets will be the bigger volume, i'd like to see Dodge get a foothold back with all the independent contractors. All the ones I knew with Dodge B vans went with the Chevy/GMC vans now that Dodge is gone and Sprinter was too high price.

 

[browens1534]

Is the ProMaster in production yet??? I just caught a cargo version and a chassis can version on a Semi Trailor at my local WalMart. Will post pic in a bit...

 

[unverferth]

Though I am sure sales to fleets will be the bigger volume, i'd like to see Dodge get a foothold back with all the independent contractors. All the ones I knew with Dodge B vans went with the Chevy/GMC vans now that Dodge is gone and Sprinter was too high price.

Amen !!