Joined
·
3 Posts
In other news... the Earth is round.
Reliability: I'd take most Chrysler products over pretty much anything out of Europe.ImperialCrown said:I actually preferred many of the styling queues of the Routan over our own domestic minivans. It was an attractive ride.
Speaking with VW dealers and customers, the Routan was always the red-headed step child of the model line.
62TE transaxles were a headache with shifting harshness and reliability issues and technicians were totally unfamiliar with the vehicle and warranty parts were probably a pain to get.
Once some customers found out after buying one that it was a Chrysler product, many felt upset and let down. "I would have never bought it if I knew it was a Chrysler".
Production went up and down over the years and it was to be discontinued and then got a reprieve and this happened over and over again.
VW is coming out with their own minivan anyways. The Routan was probably always an interim measure. There was a rumored retro microbus at first, but now it looks like the CrossBlue may happen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Routan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Microbus_Concept
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/volkswagen-crossblue-concept-photos-and-info-news
The refresh did wonders for the minivans though. I think I started foaming when I first saw the 2011 T&C in black. Chrysler has been lucky that Toyota and Honda have botched the styling of their minivans for their last two generations. They kind of conservative styling of the Chrysler minis I think ads to their appeal. They're very understated and practical. Not showy. Even the turbo minis were so subtle you'd never know they could potentially eat your lunch.Bearhawke said:Reliability: I'd take most Chrysler products over pretty much anything out of Europe.
The irony is that the Routan was/is arguably the most attractive current platlorm Mopar minivan out there........and I won't even touch on the appearance of the Honda or Toyota competition.