317K is great for any assembly with high cycles so I take my hat off to the engineers. Maybe I am old school but I sort of remember cam forces and the dynamics of lift on plate cams (of which these are compared to box cams which encapsulate the followers) and that the hot rod cams with big bumps were the ones that bent the push rods and busted the rocker arms and one would have to go with solid lifters and all that stuff. So, the rise on these cams must be pretty mild in comparison. Well, it is true that when they went with double overhead cams, one has a cam profile for intake and one for exhaust so there is probably the goodness. But everything takes up room so more things make for smaller things.
Forget oil additives since the radial forces on the cam follower are probably shearing that little pin of which it rotates on. If one has hydraulic lifters, the only adjustment I remember doing on the small block V-8 is to tighten until the noise of the lifter stops and 1/4 turn more. It was the solid lifters in which one adjusted the lash since there is no compensation. I need to get an assembly in my hands.
Forget oil additives since the radial forces on the cam follower are probably shearing that little pin of which it rotates on. If one has hydraulic lifters, the only adjustment I remember doing on the small block V-8 is to tighten until the noise of the lifter stops and 1/4 turn more. It was the solid lifters in which one adjusted the lash since there is no compensation. I need to get an assembly in my hands.