![]()
Been working on a new concept car. It's a Chrysler product... it looks somewhat sporty and maybe luxurious. I would probably at this point call it a concept Chrysler Concorde. I also like the name Chrysler Atlantic. Still working on finalizing.
I feel the headlight's are too cliche looking at this point and seem to look a bit Audi-like while the grille isn't Chrysler-y enough. But I feel if tweaked some more I could make it seem more Chrysler like... and who knows, maybe it does look like a Chrysler! I could be overly hard on myself here. That said, I like the shape of this car.
You can see my Mopar photo and all my poorly done renders at this link (within the forum).![]()
Hello again everyone! Been working on a Chrysler mid-size. I thought of many different names and ended up clapping the Concorde name on this. That name might be too outdated, but it just seemed to fit here. I was trying to think of original names are well going off geographic locations that fit with the "Pacific" and "Atlantic" style names. I wanted the car to be sleek and sporty, but luxurious inside. So this is a work in progress. I might slim the grille.
Any thoughts welcome and hope you enjoy.
Those things seem dated to me, whereas the 300 does not. Even the OG LX 300 somehow seems timeless.In my opinion, the Ferrari-style grille of the 2001 Sebrings and 1998 Concordes didn't stay around long enough.
I agree with Imperial crown. I would like to see more of the 1998 Concorde style.Those things seem dated to me, whereas the 300 does not. Even the OG LX 300 somehow seems timeless.
The 99 Chrysler Concorde and LHS, but not the earlier Condorde and 300M, just look like aerodynamic dusbusters to me with that vacuum nozzle jet intake proboscis. IMO the 300M is a great look, best of the Chrysler branded LH cars.I agree with Imperial crown. I would like to see more of the 1998 Concorde style.
What seems dated to me is the 300. The dates for the grill are 1930's, 1955 Chrysler Falcon, 1969 Lincoln Mk 3 and 1975-1985. The date for the rest of the car is 1996 Bentley Azure.
I owned an '00 300M and hated the exterior. I loved the interior. I drove that car 150,000 miles and it was fantastic.The 99 Chrysler Concorde and LHS, but not the earlier Condorde and 300M, just look like aerodynamic dusbusters to me with that vacuum nozzle jet intake proboscis. IMO the 300M is a great look, best of the Chrysler branded LH cars.
EMP1/CMP is the cheaper one.My wish for Chrysler would be premium designs and unique models (shooting brake, coupe-ish CUVs, premium interiors) that aren't available in the other brands. If they allowed access to the cheaper EMP2 platform, modify it like Audi, Mazda, and now Acura does for RWD proportions. AWD, hybridization to full electric models should be what the brand is known for.
It's Engel and Chrysler, Engles and Marx. I don't want Engles anywhere near my car, it will turn into a 2 cylinder 2 stroke.I think what CHRYSLER has now is quite good . I’m quite OK with rebadged Peugeots and DS on the short run. In the longer run IMHO, they should have an all new electric 300 that looks a lot like the present now iconic Engles inspired one. It’s a classic practical shape that contrasts with the look a like rest of the industry.
The 98-01 Concorde and 98-04 Intrepid remind me of the Charger Daytona and Superbird. The 300M reminds me it was supposed to be an Eagle. I'm not a fan of the LHS nose that spread to the Concorde for '02.The 99 Chrysler Concorde and LHS, but not the earlier Concorde and 300M, just look like aerodynamic dusbusters to me with that vacuum nozzle jet intake proboscis. IMO the 300M is a great look, best of the Chrysler branded LH cars.
See the present Challenger.I would be curious to see how a 21st. Century interpretation of the fuselage design language of the late 1960's / early 1970/s could be executed.
I wish I had the art / graphic skills to put together a rendering of what I see in my mind.
OH, Well...