So no 95 electric Geo Metro? 😆
Chrysler's Future Design Language: What Should It Be?
Chrysler's Future Design Language
What do you think Chrysler's future design language should be? Anybody feel like sharing designs they made, or aspects of other designs are certainly welcome to do so. Should the design be distinctive, smooth, luxurious, generic, etc? Should there be a corporate design across all products or should vehicles vary? What would you like to see out of Chrysler's future designs?
I designed something awhile back... Not sure it holds merit today (I'm not professional, just having fun obviously). I posted it in the quote below.
Now let's hear from you on what you think Chrysler's future design language should be like?
What do you think Chrysler's future design language should be? Anybody feel like sharing designs they made, or aspects of other designs are certainly welcome to do so. Should the design be distinctive, smooth, luxurious, generic, etc? Should there be a corporate design across all products or should vehicles vary? What would you like to see out of Chrysler's future designs?
I designed something awhile back... Not sure it holds merit today (I'm not professional, just having fun obviously). I posted it in the quote below.
![]()
Been working on a new concept car. It's a Chrysler product... it looks somewhat sporty and maybe luxurious. I would probably at this point call it a concept Chrysler Concorde. I also like the name Chrysler Atlantic. Still working on finalizing.
I feel the headlight's are too cliche looking at this point and seem to look a bit Audi-like while the grille isn't Chrysler-y enough. But I feel if tweaked some more I could make it seem more Chrysler like... and who knows, maybe it does look like a Chrysler! I could be overly hard on myself here. That said, I like the shape of this car.
You can see my Mopar photo and all my poorly done renders at this link (within the forum).![]()
Hello again everyone! Been working on a Chrysler mid-size. I thought of many different names and ended up clapping the Concorde name on this. That name might be too outdated, but it just seemed to fit here. I was trying to think of original names are well going off geographic locations that fit with the "Pacific" and "Atlantic" style names. I wanted the car to be sleek and sporty, but luxurious inside. So this is a work in progress. I might slim the grille.
Any thoughts welcome and hope you enjoy.
Now let's hear from you on what you think Chrysler's future design language should be like?
221 - 240 of 293 Posts
Thank you! The Mazda5 was so perfect. Loved the footprint, sliding doors and yes the looks. I was very confused when writers refused to call it a minivan when its dimensions were the closest to a real minivan we had seen in years. These boats we have today are great but they're not minivans.That's a bunch of nonsense. Side impact regulations add virtually no space. As for the length, I doubt anyone looking for a small minvan would mind it being 185" long instead of 177" long, both common compact car lengths. The original Grand Caravan was 192" long, same length as an Accord or Sonata. That was the whole point, a small van that parks exactly like a FWD car. A real minivan.
Vehicles actually on sale in the US:
Chevy Spark 1,595 mm (62.8 in) wide 3,636 mm (143.1 in) long (federal bumpers add a whopping 2" to the South Korean car). 97 cu ft subcompact.
Mitsubishi Mirage 1,665 mm (65.6 in) wide 3,845 mm (151.4 in) long, 103/101 cu ft compact hatch/sedan
Nissan Versa 1,740 mm (68.5 in) wide 4,495 mm (177.0 in) long 105 cu ft compact, same as Neon
Hyundai Accent 1,729 mm (68.1 in) wide 4,385 mm (172.6 in) long, 104 cu ft compact, same as Neon
This is precisely what you get on the PSA EMP2 platform with first generation minivan dimensions:
C4 Spacetourer / Grand C4 Spacetourer 1st gen Caravan/Grand Caravan Wheelbase 2,785 or 2,840 mm (109.6 or 111.8 in) 112 in (2,844.8 mm) 119.1 in (3,025 mm) Length 4,428 or 4,600 mm (174.3 or 181.1 in) 177.3 in (4,503 mm) 191.9 in (4,874 mm) Width 1,826 mm (71.9 in) 72 in (1,829 mm) Height 1,610 or 1,625 mm (63.4 or 64.0 in) 64.6 in (1,641 mm)
Citroën C4 Picasso - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Grand C4 spacetourer is the same wheelbase as the SWB Caravan, it winds up 181" long, 4" longer than the SWB caravan. Width and height are almost exactly the same. That's pretty much what modern safety regulations do.
Before I saw this said B&O, it looked like a Chrysler wheel at first. What if they sourced this design for their vehicles?
Minor detail, but did they split the bottom of the steering wheel for 2022, or is this just an image glitch? I've seen the in person images, but haven't seen this change.
Not too bad. I would add more chrome though.Here we go. It's pretty rough, but the first new rendering I've done in a bit. Click the image for it's full size. If you look too close, it gets rough. This would fill the slot the excellent Chrysler 200S/C was in.
can i ask for an updated RWD 93 Daytona 
Ask all you want. Given the lack of a small RWD platform and how poorly the Mazda and Toyota have done the chances are slim and none, and slim just left out the door. More likely is an AWD '93 Stealth revival as a hybrid on EMP2. That's a platform they already make with several factories with spare capacity.can i ask for an updated RWD 93 Daytona
221 - 240 of 293 Posts
