[tomaz]

hmmmmm....

 

[tomaz]

About the 200, it's confusing that 1st they were stating that it was going to be based on a new and bigger Alfa, and now it would be like a Dart, wasn't that the 100?, I don't think it is a good idea to make the 200 Smaller :thumbsdown: .

And now they're saying very opposite things about the Caravan and the Avenger, I guess Chrysler it's trying to keep their stuff more confidential than in the past, or they just changed plans very suddenly.

Umm... They never said or even assumed it was gonna be based on a bigger Alfa Romeo (obviously since there isnt a "Bigger Alfa Romeo"), it was always said to be based on the Darts Platform, Just bigger. The 100 was suposed to be a Compact Hatch for Chrysler

 

[tomaz]

Those are trucks posing as cars, not in the league of T&C, Journey, or even the dated Pacifica.
Not sure that is correct?
Dart is CUSW, 200 was supposed to be CUSW+, like KL, still too small for and American D segment premium car IMO.
Hope the rumors are wrong, otherwise we are stuck with another 65,000 per year model.
Mr Marchionne, please LEARN your marketplace before making billion dollar blunders..uh decisions...your study groups are flawed.

"Dart Platform" "Just bigger" = CUSW+