Joined
·
2,435 Posts
Money has been invested. In Jeep and Ram product and plants.Stellantis has it's work cut out for it.
American's were burnt by the last merger of equals.
Money will have to be invested on product and plants.
Money has been invested. In Jeep and Ram product and plants.Stellantis has it's work cut out for it.
American's were burnt by the last merger of equals.
Money will have to be invested on product and plants.
Exor has deal with Peugeot family, not with French state or Dongfeng. They will rule together and Peugeot family can not leapfrog Exor in terms of Stellantis stake.They pretty much had to do it that way if they wanted Exor, Peugeot, France and Dongfeng to get double voting rights after 3 years, since PSA is a French company and the merged company had to be Dutch to make that happen. "FCA is a public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap), incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands, with corporate seat in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and address at 25 St. James’s Street, SW1A 1HA, London, United Kingdom, registered with the Dutch trade register under number: 60372958." It's a legal technicality, it doesn't mean it isn't a merger of equals, then again it doesn't mean it is.
I don't see what was wrong with Sergio. Biography is avalaible:I personally hope he's more like Bob Lutz then Sergio.
Yeah, excellent. Offer non space efficient FWD based products with no mechanical AWD solution with small engine which tends to blow. Did I said it's a brilliant idea?They don't need money for platform development that has already been done. Most of the federalization has even been done. It looks like they are going to have to modify them for Fiat engines and whatever transmission is chosen. Although in the short term they could probably get away with merely retuning the 408, 508 L and DS9 with the Prince engine (likewise 4008, 5008 and DS7 crossovers). They just have to change the exterior parts in front of the front fenders and behind the rear fenders. They can hit 60% of the US market with those two platforms.
LOLMore importantly......Does John Elkann speak Continental* Portuguese ?
* SORRY...BRAZILIAN OR AZOREAN PORTUGUESE DON'T QUITE COUNT!![]()
I am not a Sergio hater. With that said, he was virtually like Iacocca. After he saved the company, both of them seemed to grow tired of the day to day things of running the company. Lee bought Jeep, very smart. But by 1990 because of old K car based vehicles they were in trouble again. This time, they have managed to continue to make money despite themselves. They need good leadership here in NA, I believe it's missing today. Just my opinion.I don't see what was wrong with Sergio. Biography is avalaible:
Sergio Marchionne: 9788820067151: Amazon.com: Books
Sergio Marchionne on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Sergio Marchionnewww.amazon.com
John Elkann is Executive Chairman. So yes, that changes a bit.I was looking at the CEO, but the chair of the board may have more power - for one, he can theoretically fire the CEO.
Actually that's the only thing which is for sure good with FCA from Day 1. Nothing wrong there. It can only get worse.They need good leadership here in NA, I believe it's missing today. Just my opinion.
Just not true.FCA is not absorbing PSA. It's the other way around.
Not even close! SM was given a company and only with the intentions of getting some love in NA for Fiat/Alfa. Not to mention the BS with Dart.I am not a Sergio hater. With that said, he was virtually like Iacocca. After he saved the company, both of them seemed to grow tired of the day to day things of running the company. Lee bought Jeep, very smart. But by 1990 because of old K car based vehicles they were in trouble again. This time, they have managed to continue to make money despite themselves. They need good leadership here in NA, I believe it's missing today. Just my opinion.
Let me remind you that the ENTIRE automotive industry at the time had the opportunity to partner with Chrysler LLC...and NOBODY would even touch Chrysler LLC...with the exception of Fiat S.p.A.Not even close! SM was given a company and only with the intentions of getting some love in NA for Fiat/Alfa. Not to mention the BS with Dart.
SM may have been a good bean counter, but that's all he was and didn't have an iota about cars. Especially about what sold or consumers wanted.
The Blue Oval had nothing to do with the task force. They applied for billions in zero-interest loans and got them. They knew what they were doing at the time - getting cheap government loans from the government so they could ironically pretend to be “government free.”The Blue Oval was forced to build a car by this said task force also.
That car almost killed me.
Blue Oval is still paying off a loan because of that car/task force.
I have been around Chrysler my whole 60 years. These past few years are very un Chryslerlike. Usually in times like these with old products in some cases, a lousy quality reputation, (deserved or not), they normally are burning cash. This time seems to be different. Whether this is from Sergio or despite him, only time will tell. I am a rarity on here, a Chrysler only lifer, never owned anything else. I'm also not a European side of the company hater. In order to survive, they all need each other. I hope they never lose sight of this.Actually that's the only thing which is for sure good with FCA from Day 1. Nothing wrong there. It can only get worse.
A car that got 40 mpg highway would have come due to the strings attached by the task force. It didn't have to come at the time it did, run on premium, or be on a widened C-Evo CUSW. It had to run on premium as long as the car was 3200 lb and they didn't give the engine direct injection. If they just tacked a trunk on Giulietta and made it in the US with a Dodge nose that would have saved 200 lbs. If they made it a sedan on SCCS SUSW they could have saved another 200 lb (2800 lb). An economy car running on premium was doomed to failure in the US. Unlike Europe the point is lower operating cost, not avoiding multiple CO2 taxes.The Blue Oval had nothing to do with the task force. They applied for billions in zero-interest loans and got them. They knew what they were doing at the time - getting cheap government loans from the government so they could ironically pretend to be “government free.”
The Dart would have come regardless. At the time it was thought of, everyone wanted economy from a car. We were all remembering high gas prices. The Fiat engine was inevitable as they were showing off the merger. The rush to produce it was only FCA's fault. So what if they had to wait two more months for the stock to be granted? What difference would it have made? The government was a nonvoting partner.
Fact of the matter is most at the time were calling for Chrysler to be shut down, period, or donated to GM or Ford to be shut down by them. No other company wanted Chrysler. Magna did, but was caught in a sudden cash crunch. Would I have preferred for Magna to be loaned lots of money and given Chrysler? Do we know what would have happened then? That's not a question I will ever have to answer!
Hindsight is 20/20.
As I told you many times before, a long wheelbase is a plus in the US. Electric AWD is a plus for most applications in the US.Yeah, excellent. Offer non space efficient FWD based products with no mechanical AWD solution with small engine which tends to blow. Did I said it's a brilliant idea?
I watched an interview with Bob Lutz where he professed to being a big fan of Sergio. It sounded to me like Lutz respected Marchionne as much as (or even more than) any other leader in the automotive world.I personally hope he's more like Bob Lutz then Sergio.