Sorry, but here I think you're merely projecting anti-FCA bias onto a name change without a shred of real or circumstantial evidence, as I don't see this as provable or even logical. Otherwise, I agree on your first point, and the Honda talking point is a good argument, as is the rest of the paragraph.
The poor attitude is Exactly the problem with the current product. Lack of desire to change. Quality is fixing exhaust bolts breaking or poor ball joint durability. Window seals that don't keep the weather out and suspension bushings that don't shrink when the weather turns cold. Electronics that don't freeze or take hours to load. Oh a a dealer network that doesn't set out to rip people off.
Well my wk2 replacement may just end up being a Yukon Denali diesel. $104 k was the sticker. It's just too big for the wife but she hasn't said no. I don't like the Wagoneer enough nor the power train choices. The one thing stellantis has over gm is the dealership network is quite as scuzzy.
I actually like the look of the new Yukon! Get a unique color like Satin Steel, Redwood or Midnight blue! I want Dodge or Chrysler to come out with a variation of the GW.
It's a good thing the general public has a short memory. It's too bad this is what management is counting on for sales. Fix the quality and durability issues.
Waterfall grill was very cool though short lived as Imperials go, besides the 30's was it 74 to 75 81-83 and 90-93? Personally I love the 69-73 Fuse style the best, but the front clip of the 74-75 is cool, but that 81 and 82 with the hidden headlights That should come back somehow! Cheers!
I would agree. I like hidden headlights as well but I like when they work more! haha.
Yeah......The outside styling does have more than a little resemblance to something that would have come out of South Korea sometime during the 1990's.
You ignored my circumstantial evidence in the first paragraph: "the only Chrysler with a number should be 300. 300 is like Chrysler's Abarth, it is supposed to be a sport version of another Chrysler. Putting 300 on the 190 HP 2.7 was an intentional insult by Daimler. Putting 200 on the Sebring was an intentional insult to Chrysler customers by Fiat. 200 means average horsepower and less than a 300. They followed that up with the insult of not putting direct injection on the 2.4 so it didn't even have 200 HP like the competition."
Lancia can show its love for Chrysler by staying out of North America. My dad was a big Duke Ellington fan.Except maybe love...
I agree they don't need to be in the American market.
I also loved the fuselage cars '69-'73
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
That's still a weak argument that it was intentional.
Why though? AWD wasn't with any hemi for a long time.
I appreciate your effort on the rendering. I've submitted a few, but have gotten savaged in the past by those who just didn't like my submission. So, I applaud you for submitting. That said, when/if the Imperial ever comes back, I hope they have the courage to make it a proper sedan, instead of another me-too, '4-door coupe' look-alike. In '05, they bucked the fwd, cab-forward, jellybean trend with the 300, and it was a huge success. A new Imperial, if it ever happens (or any new Chrysler standard-bearer, for that matter), needs to stand out, not blend in. Just my opinion.
Don't let them stop you from posting. I enjoy seeing people's ideas. Maybe you can come up with something that competes against the Aviator. I would love to see that.
I did the Newport on Behance. An inch longer wheelbase at 120 in.
Hmm I don't think I saw it. Chrysler needs to one up every vehicle they make to seem better than the competition.
