Allpar Forums banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
33,749 Posts
Dakota was not a small, light truck. Ranger is much smaller. My 1992 Dakota with aluminum cap tips the scales at the landfill at 4420 lbs, and the newer Dakotas were about 1,000 lbs more than that. The 92 Dakota was capable of 20-23 mpg depending on drivetrain. It wasn't poor gas mileage that did it in. But bloating up over the years might have adversely affected sales by taking it out of its niche.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GaryS

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
33,749 Posts
OK, that would still be about 500 lbs heavier than my '92.
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top