A new Jeep from Paris? They should call it the Croissant!
What next, a new Alfa Romeo from Brooklyn...?
What next, a new Alfa Romeo from Brooklyn...?
Not sure I should laugh or cry...You forget that in 2 years, the Wrangler will be another $10k more expensive, so, at $50k, the Recon will be slotted below with comparable equipment.
For looks. Buyers expect Jeeps to be rugged, and nothing looks more rugged than a box on wheels.I'm really starting to wonder why does the Recon need to be shaped the way it is if its only BEV? Is that a massive frunk in the front of that thing?
Yup. To add insult to injury, Jeep is about to recall 70,000 manual transmission JLs, which is roughly half of all manual transmission JLs sold so far.That’s a combo that sounds good on paper, but don’t do great in real life. Unless the one I had was an anomaly, the 3.6 manual tune (which limits power to protect a weak clutch assembly from overheating) resulted in inconsistent and very peaky engine output. After the dealer confined all software was up to date and nothing changed, I used CarMax’s 30 day return policy to be rid of it and get an automatic.
According to Jeep.com, a 2023 Wrangler 2-door Sport S with a hardtop and 8-speed automatic transmission is $43,000.You can still buy a pretty basic wrangler for not so bad price. Low to mid 30s. In fact, 6 speed pentastar with rear LSD would be a fun package in my view.
I know you suggested that. But that’s not a viable option to many Wrangler buyers...between JL’s never-ending clutch issues and the inherent limitations of the soft top.I suggested a sport with 6 speed and maybe the anti-spin diff "rear lsd" as the only option. That would hit the mid 30s.
Perhaps, but adding high fenders to one of the trim levels doesn’t seem like the result of a thorough redesign, which JL was supposed to be.Been way too long since Allpar had a good ol’ technical suspension discussion!
I wouldn’t say high fenders are a bad way to increase tire size and could be the “better” method because it keeps the original suspension geometry intact. However, the larger tire and it’s weight are likely to overwhelm what the OEM components can handle which leads to premature wear, death wobble or simple catastrophic failure. A “heavy duty” aftermarket may look impressive enough to handle the weight but the geometry is obviously a mess leading to the same terrible handling/premature wear and tear.
The higher sitting body may have raised the center of gravity which again could put the JL suspension at the extreme edge of its design.
It appears the JL design seems to have been a case of being just within tolerances, damn the consequences.
Ford had a talent drain of its own; much of which ended at Nissan when it relocated to Tennessee in the late 2000s. Two-thirds of the people I dealt with at Nissan N.A. were Ford ex-pats who, unfortunately, brought with them Ford’s dysfunctional culture.If there was a talent drain, it was probably because the JK was done 10 years before the JL. Plenty of time for people to say adios and move on. Ford seemed happy to take on the talent that Chrysler let go.