?Fleets is hardly on a par with Motorsports?TWX said:My guess, and it's just a guess, is that it's the least-bad fit.
'Fleets' is another example of attempting to make the best-fit, given that Fleets can cover new and old, cars, trucks, vans, Jeeps, etc.
Thanks for listening!DaveAdmin said:The move was not due to an outside source. I'm moving Motorsports back.
Largely, it was due to the fact that I could not find what I was looking for half the time.
Section headers are bigger, bolder, and centered, as part of that.
The issue of cross-posting Motorsports stuff has been brought to Bill. Essentially he has to uncheck the Chrysler category when he posts racing news.
Any further thoughts on this? The PT section seems to have slowed down since it was moved to the cars from the past section. Perhaps vehicles that are still in widespread use, even though they are out of production could be in the "Cars" section you mention. I find myself not checking the PT section as often since it was moved.DaveAdmin said:Am thinking about bringing back the "categories of cars" category... might be handy for:
2) Minivans (Journey, PT would go into "Cars")
Wish there was a way to customize category display.
To be fair, Bob...I think you're a bit more "vintage" than me. :lol:Bob ONeill said:'95? Vintage '94 Spirit? Funny.
Vintage (IMHO) = '70s not '90s.
Well, for me, it's the cutoff for when I started really paying attention to "new" cars versus existing cars that were just always there or were there in variations.Stratuscaster said:I'm not sure why it's 95 for me - just feels "right".