The beauty for RAM is that it doesn't have to settle on which end of the market to approach, they can continue the 1500's formula. Being able to share parts with the other brands certainly helps in lowering costs.
The beauty for RAM is that it doesn't have to settle on which end of the market to approach, they can continue the 1500's formula. Being able to share parts with the other brands certainly helps in lowering costs.Yep, Maverick outsells Santa Cruz for a number of reasons. Like you said it looks like a truck, and the pricing are probably the biggest points. But you also have a truck that gets car like mileage (something the Ridgeline and Santa Cruz do not do nearly as well).
I think you also have two products launched at very different parts of the same market. Ford designed Maverick to replace its small sedans and crossovers and built it to a price point to do it. Hyundai built a truck to add to the top of the line above it's cars and small SUVs. It was designed to be a more premium product and less a truck. Which kind of shows the market for a premium lifestyle car/truck is lower than the market for a competent entry level vehicle that gives you a lot of the practicality of a much more expensive vehicle.
The reason Maverick sells so well is the low price of the base HEV. They need that for volume to keep it alive.The smartest would be to build this on STLA Medium and offer it with PHEV or BEV only. Beat Ford to a BEV compact pickup and you will own the city delivery market.
But I am not convinced we have smart enough people in Auburn Hills to see that Ram needs a full lineup of trucks if it wants to be the truck-only brand.
Correct, but lifestyle trucks/cars originally had the feel of a car that had a bed. Not an suv trying to be a truck, not a truck trying to be a car. Last time I rode in an El Camino if I closed my eyes you could have told me I was in a Chevelle..The reason the Maverick is selling so much better than the Santa Cruz is because it looks like a truck, rather than like a crossover SUV with a bed.
In fairness, the current Ridgeline is an actual truck and looks like one. The previous (first) gen looked more like a lifestyle crossover though.
Its impressive in real life.Correct, but lifestyle trucks/cars originally had the feel of a car that had a bed. Not an suv trying to be a truck, not a truck trying to be a car. Last time I rode in an El Camino if I closed my eyes you could have told me I was in a Chevelle..
I think the reason the Maverick is selling well is because it's impressive on paper and can be bought for a lot less than the Santa Cruz which doesn't impress with performance, price nor looks. Maverick at least checks two of those boxes for the price.
Our local Toyota dealer lot has been so empty for so long I was starting to wonder about it. But in the last couple of months I have looked at their online inventory from time to time and the in-transit vehicles (mostly Tacomas and Rav4s) disappear from the site and new ones are added all the time so I'm guessing that means almost everything is sold by the time it hits the lot.The biggest Toyota dealer in our area advertises all over town, "NO DEALER MARKUPS". That is a big deal in our area. One reason we drove a Corolla Cross.
Stellantis inherited an FCA USA where invest in new products was almost nothing. It’s not the last 2 years, it’s the last 5 or more years.I mean WTH is going on here? Stellantis executives were handed a world map where the United States was chopped off?
Stellantis is hopefully rebuilding to overcome years of neglect in the US market. Hopefully. The fact there is nothing coming right away was because nothing was under development under FCA.No one knows what Stellantis is holding out for. It seems like they are in reserve mode while everyone else jumps into being innovative with new products, trying out segments to see where market share is. Instead of responding in the US it seems, they would rather offer them to developing markets but give us their most expensive products first.
Giorgio... It's very obvious where you can find its roots.2 years is not just not enough time if you're starting from scratch. 4-5 years is plenty for vehicle development. I think you'll have 3+ vehicles on STLA Large or Frame by the end of 2025 easily.
Perhaps, but the battery implementation alone in the Maseratis vs. STLA Large shows there has been a very high degree of transformation since that starting point.Giorgio... It's very obvious where you can find its roots.