It shows a flaw in development and testing. Hopefully they update procedures from this.
I’m with you on this one.I am aware of how the software on these vehicles works and what the issue is that causes this. It's much easier to call out something that most do not understand and create "negative press"...it's America let's be honest. I fully understand why someone would be put off by something like this though.
In a day of modern vehicles, multiple VSSs, CAN systems, yaw sensors etc., the way a vehicle's safety logic kicks in is not something uncontrollable.
And I also agree with this.It shows a flaw in development and testing. Hopefully they update procedures from this.
Release date 4th Quarter 2023?There are refinements & updates in the pipeline. Everything new has a learning curve.
The Hornet (GG) is basically a sound lauch. The press will have haters, it is SOP for click-baiters.
View attachment 94582
View attachment 94583
View attachment 94584
View attachment 94585
Q4? Jeez, at this rate I might be able to get another Maverick before I can buy a Hornet....Release date 4th Quarter 2023?
So, there is no fix. Just a delay while they sell them to the public.
Brilliant.
Q4 for the potential software patch, not for vehicle release.Q4? Jeez, at this rate I might be able to get another Maverick before I can buy a Hornet....
And why would you buy a Hornet before the software patch has actually been released? Especially now?Q4 for the potential software patch, not for vehicle release.
I was merely pointing the fact that there is a distinction between the vehicle release and the proposed patch release. You stated that you cannot buy the vehicle till then, and there was no indication that it was based on your opinion that you cannot buy said vehicle because of the patch.And why would you buy a Hornet before the software patch has actually been released? Especially now?
This may come as a shock, but this is very much normal procedure for automakers these days. I haven’t had a vehicle in 3 years now that escaped needing a software patch of some sort within the first year of ownership. All but one has required multiple updates.And why would you buy a Hornet before the software patch has actually been released? Especially now?
Depends on if it’s easy to trigger or not. These Hornets will be going for full road tests in the coming months, we’ll see if it happens to anyone outside of these roller tests.6 months to fix something that will turn your AWD into a FWD and alarms all over the dash.
There will be a lot of Hornets sitting at dealer lots or a lot of one-and-done customers.
If the only way to trigger it is to have three wheels with little grip and one wheel with full grip, then we will see what happens when people stomp on it under wet type conditions.Depends on if it’s easy to trigger or not. These Hornets will be going for full road tests in the coming months, we’ll see if it happens to anyone outside of these roller tests.
Depends on if it’s easy to trigger or not. These Hornets will be going for full road tests in the coming months, we’ll see if it happens to anyone outside of these roller tests.
I live up here in the Northeast, that happens all the time in the winter here. Heck even in the fall: wet, dead leaves act an awful lot like ice sometimes.If the only way to trigger it is to have three wheels with little grip and one wheel with full grip, then we will see what happens when people stomp on it under wet type conditions.
It wasn't infantile...on TFL's side anyway. Subaru marketed their vehciles as rough and ready rough roader etc etc. So TFL called them on it. They weren't supposed to actually try and test their marketing buzzwords IRLA couple years ago Subaru recalibrated its AWD settings following a roller test from TFL.
TFL remains blacklisted from Subaru press events, due to some infantile situation many years ago. But that’s another story.
That wasn't the reason Subaru blacklisted TFL.It wasn't infantile...on TFL's side anyway. Subaru marketed their vehciles as rough and ready rough roader etc etc. So TFL called them on it. They weren't supposed to actually try and test their marketing buzzwords IRL
My dad still loves Subaru but he's more realistic about it than...well, Subaru
Yeah, they "damaged" it by putting it through an offroad test that, if it lived up to their marketing, shouldn't have damaged it. But either way I don't see them ever making up because Subaru won't give up their marketing and TFL won't give up their testing.That wasn't the reason Subaru blacklisted TFL.
According to TFL, Subaru blacklisted them for damaging a press car.
But yeah, TFL has been vocal about Subaru's self-proclaimed "off-road capability."
I have driven a couple of Focus STs over the years. And ridden in two Focur RS'. The RSs were just insane (both had been pumped up even more) and the STs really fun. The one I liked the best was the Fiesta ST however. It was just a scream......it was like putting on a roller skate.Yeah, they "damaged" it by putting it through an offroad test that, if it lived up to their marketing, shouldn't have damaged it. But either way I don't see them ever making up because Subaru won't give up their marketing and TFL won't give up their testing.
Too bad, I would love to see a Forester Turbo come back. Good competition for the Hornet. Though now we've got the Focus ST out there too....wouldn't mind seeing that compared with the Hornet by someone (maybe Ben Hardy?)