To me, that's actually a GOOD thing.
See?...It's all a matter of perception.
Besides...Isn't the ICE set-up going to be eventually dropped anyway, and be replaced by a fully BEV version?
To me, that's actually a GOOD thing.good or bad i get Mazda vibes when looking at this.
And All of Horace and John Dodge's People said:I like Mazda myself, so I don't mind either. I do see the push back mostly from the "classic muscle" crowd as it is a departure from that. But I truly believe Dodge can't survive on muscle alone and needs to expand into other types of performance.
Don't tell me. Let me guess
I assume you mean the FCA part. After all, the very solid financial position of Groupe PSA was probably the biggest factor in FCA's mad dash to the altar.i am not looking to buy anything compact anytime soon, but I am excited dodge is filling out their line up.
and, as I understand, the rt will be the muscle car of the segment. it Looks to outperform its competition and hopefully do it in A fun and raucous manner. and hopefully this will lead towards a stable future. Remember how close this company was to death? it wasn’t that long ago, and there is a lot of recovery left to go
Just wondering......If the marriage had taken place...say...two or three years earlier, ?Would the combined entity have bothered to continue development on the 3.0 Litre I-6, and instead just perform a few more tweaks...(direct injection, electric turbocharger, etc.) to the 3.6, and leave it at that? Could they have achieved significant cost savings?We can be happy that the Hornet and revised Compass are the last two mostly FCA vehicles for Dodge and Jeep.
The coming vehicles for Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep will all be on STLA platforms.
FCA powertrains (2.0T, 3.0T) will continue for a while.