Allpar Forums banner

The 2022-2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee Scored Poorly on 1 Updated Crash Test

1147 Views 13 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  13 200 3.6
From the artlcle:

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) recently updated one of its crash tests in response to rear passenger safety systems not keeping pace with those offered for front-seat occupants. The IIHS recently used its updated test on over a dozen two- and three-row SUVs, and many, including the 2022-23 Jeep Grand Cherokee, were shown not to provide adequate safety for passengers behind the front row.

Full article here:

The 2022-2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee Scored Poorly on 1 Updated Crash Test (msn.com)
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
The hits keep on coming for the Grand Cherokee.

Yes, it is a new test.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
It suggests that engineering is not focused on safety but on passing safety tests. But I could be wrong.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Probably doing the minimum, too much safety costs too much money and cuts into those margins.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
They also changed the Testing so that the Crash barrier is greatly heavier for the Test vehicle.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
They also changed the Testing so that the Crash barrier is greatly heavier for the Test vehicle.
The biggest change though is adding a rear seat test dummy. A few models did protect the rear dummy well. Most did not, but did protect the driver.
The fact Grand Cherokee is a new design but did not pass the test is sad, but not unexpected.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
The biggest change though is adding a rear seat test dummy. A few models did protect the rear dummy well. Most did not, but did protect the driver.
The fact Grand Cherokee is a new design but did not pass the test is sad, but not unexpected.
Sounds like they have more work to do.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
If one was being cynical, one would think Jeep (and many other manufacturers) are designing vehicles to pass the test rather than designing safer vehicles.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
If one was being cynical, one would think Jeep (and many other manufacturers) are designing vehicles to pass the test rather than designing safer vehicles.
Are you comparing it to the claim that teachers are teaching to the test?
Are you comparing it to the claim that teachers are teaching to the test?
Not really my point.
If one was being cynical, one would think Jeep (and many other manufacturers) are designing vehicles to pass the test rather than designing safer vehicles.
I think they are all doing that, but IIHS gives them a heads up when a new test is coming out. Stellantis just didn't take advantage of the lead time.

See the fine print for examples of those who did:
Sonata applies only to vehicles built after December 2022
Camry applies only to vehicles built after January 2023
Soltera applies only to vehicles built after October 2022
R1S applies only to vehicles built after January 2023

  • Like
Reactions: 1
Are you comparing it to the claim that teachers are teaching to the test?
No problem with that if it is a good test.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
No problem with that if it is a good test.
Agreed. That's been lost in the furor over standardized testing, which I might add is something just about every country does, as a matter of fairness. How else do you compare schools? The tests just have to be more comprehensive and more valid. Unfortunately validity costs money and time (and the belief that education is important and good, and more important than sending some profits to a campaign contributor or friend).

I like the English system, though the English don’t.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Whatever, cars are safe enough anyhow. Motorcycles on the other hand...
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Top