Allpar Forums banner
1 - 4 of 19 Posts

· Vaguely badass...
Joined
·
7,648 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

· Vaguely badass...
Joined
·
7,648 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Erik Latranyi said:
It's a flaw. Some were AWD.
The requirement stated was "To make the cut, these SUVs had to cost less than $38,000." Said nothing about drivetrain. And the score breakdown was "The experts' scores account for 75% of the total score; 15% from the family's scores; and 10% was based on fuel economy." Again - nothing directly having to do with AWD.

plymouth1 said:
Toyota Venza is not an SUV. It is a Station Wagon. None of these vehicles are even close to a Grand Cherokee.
But ALL of these vehicles are - by and large - station wagons.

plymouth1 said:
Why did they waste time testing them when all they had to do was look at them. Grand Cherokee blows them all away big time
Because this is what automotive blogs and sites SHOULD be doing - comparing vehicles and reporting what they found.

If all they have to do is "look at them", then it becomes a beauty contest - a superficial way to compare vehicles at best.

This is more of a realistic consumer comparison than most, IMHO.
 
1 - 4 of 19 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top