The problem with the SRT Viper is that it's basically a Dodge Viper, except it now costs like a Porsche.Tomguy said:IMO, the problem with Viper is that everyone still sees it as a Dodge Viper, but now its pricing is in Porsche territory.
That would be a real shame, considering the roots of the brand.valiant67 said:All the marketing in the world won't convince people to pay more for a car than they think it is worth. This seems to be a common problem across the SRT lineup. If they can't sell the cars cheaper, the SRT brand may well fold.
I assume dealers only in the long run... When they lose money on one they have little incentive to buy more for their dealer lots.mentalicca said:But since SRT does not do dealer assistance (i.e. rebates/incentives), has there been any financial losses for Chrysler the company, and not just Chrysler dealers?
The 1992 Viper was a game changer. This Viper is a bench warmer.md80891 said:Time to call Sharp. Viper needs to jump upscale as the new ME412, Need Firepower, Gilles needs to seek other opportunities.
One simple statement with huge impact. You are right. I was very disappointed, still am, with this new car. It's not a Viper, period.IMPERIAL4EVER said:The 1992 Viper was a game changer. This Viper is a bench warmer.
I agree, and it's the point of my post... you have a triple-digit-priced car that is having an identity crisis. It's got premium superb quality leather and all these fancy options available... and yet it's loud, it's hot, it's obnoxious - it's bipolar in the WRONG ways. They either need to go one direction or the other. In other words, amenities identical to the last-gen Viper for the one direction, or amenities in the other if they want to try to price themselves into Porche's market: Rear-exiting exhaust that doesn't pump heat, noise and vibrations directly to the occupants, etc. I agree that this is not an "Everyman's car" - but they are trying to make it be one by adding stuff that people who really want a Viper couldn't care less about. Honestly, I would LOVE to have a Viper. A blue GTS. But not this current generation. I want a Viper, not a leather-wrapped identity crisis. Yes, they have the $tripper models that cost "Only" 110k or so, that are closer to a true Viper in blood and execution. The $140k+ Vipers need to have sound deadening, rear-exiting exhaust with crossovers, and other "Luxuries" that put them into competition within the market they've been priced into.dakrt99 said:I have said it for years, the Viper needs to evolve, part of evolution is getting better, much better and moving upscale. SRT should not build this car. Too much clutter - big speakers, 8.4" screen and reconfigurable TFT display - all nonsense IMO. When people think about the Viper, they don't think about conveniences, luxury, accessible performance, gadgets, they think about a scary, out of controlled performance monster. Shelby 427 cobra. I feel the world has left the Viper in the 90s, quite frankly. This car is unsure of where it needs to be, philosophically speaking.
that's why I said the ME412 should be the new Viper years ago.IMPERIAL4EVER said:The 1992 Viper was a game changer. This Viper is a bench warmer.
So, you did not get Ralphs message Im seeing...oh2o said:"Gilles said that many dealers keep the expensive cars, which list for over $100,000, locked in their showrooms, limiting sales"
Seriously?? Sales are being restricted because the vehicles are locked in showrooms? Maybe if they didn't cost $100k-$150k they wouldn't have to be locked in showrooms...
We need the Firepower with a BIG V8md80891 said:Time to call Sharp. Viper needs to jump upscale as the new ME412, Need Firepower, Gilles needs to seek other opportunities.
Or a hellcat....Mr.Source said:So, you did not get Ralphs message Im seeing...
We need the Firepower with a BIG V8