Allpar Forums banner

1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
37,275 Posts
5x4", doesn't matter 6 cylinder or V8, disc or drum brakes. All A bodies used that bolt pattern (except the Hemi ones) until sometime around 1972 or so, when disc brake A bodies went to the 5x4.5" bolt circle and the drum brake cars stayed with 5x4"
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
5x4", doesn't matter 6 cylinder or V8, disc or drum brakes. All A bodies used that bolt pattern (except the Hemi ones) until sometime around 1972 or so, when disc brake A bodies went to the 5x4.5" bolt circle and the drum brake cars stayed with 5x4"
Thanks Thats what I thought too, friend says other wise. I get a Twinkie for that.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,969 Posts
Yes, all A-body 8.75 axles are 5 x 4. They started useing E-body disc brakes in 73 with 5 x 4,5 pattern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bearhawke

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
37,275 Posts
Are the new charger and 300 the same pattern as the 70's C bodys?
No. Some people consider them "close enough" and use them. To each their own, but I would not run them.
The old C and B body cars were 4x4.5" which is the same as 5x114.3 mm.
The new L based cars are 5x115 mm.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,091 Posts
The older Intrepid type 300's were 114.3 which is 4.5"

It seems the metric "part namers" had more authority than the inchers!!

Thanks
Randy
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
13,926 Posts
The older Intrepid type 300's were 114.3 which is 4.5"

It seems the metric "part namers" had more authority than the inchers!!

Thanks
Randy
Especially being several later model Japanese cars also have the 5 x 4.5" (114.3 MM) bolt pattern. Note that hub diameters, width of rim as well as offsets can vary...........a lot but still.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,091 Posts
Somehow, I can't picture Chrysler Engineers discussing an ideal bolt circle and coming up with 114.3 mm.

I'm positive they converted 4.5" to mm for some other reason.

Thanks
Randy
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
13,926 Posts
Somehow, I can't picture Chrysler Engineers discussing an ideal bolt circle and coming up with 114.3 mm.

I'm positive they converted 4.5" to mm for some other reason.

Thanks
Randy
Probably for the same reason that many of the traditional Detroit Three plus AMC manufacturers changed over from SAE to metric numbers when discussing the 318=5.2L, Chevy 350=5.7L, etc, never mind that most of the fasteners on those engines were still USS/SAE threads till the end.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top