Allpar Forums banner

Why do you think Challenger sales have been steadily growing?

1 reading
3.6K views 8 replies 7 participants last post by  valiant67  
#1 ·
...since it launched in 2008?

The more typical pattern in this segment is for sales to soar in the first two years, and crash right after.

In Challenger's case, I think it's a combination of multiple reasons:

--Timeless styling: the more people get to see one driving around, the greater the chances more people will want one (and the heritage associated with it)

--Dodge has walked a fine line between giving Challenger practicality and comfort as a daily driver, and credibility for performance and sportiness, offering a better all-around alternative than Mustang or Camaro

--I read Challenger has the highest level of conquest from outside the Chrysler Group. This alone would represent a steady stream to fresh blood into the brand

--Challenger owners' median age is reportedly younger than that of Mustang or Camaro, which is surprising to me considering the higher price and bigger size of Challenger. At the same time, I find lots of Baby Boomers and retirees owning one. There appears to be a happy coexistence between young and old Challenger owners, which is not usually the case.

--Challenger's comfort and practicality seems to provide an excellent choice to Empty Nesters which, as we know, is right now a growing demographic as Baby Boomers age.

Other thoughts?
 
#2 ·
Those are some likely contributing factors. Consistently good press reviews and excellent resale values can't hurt, either.
 
#4 ·
I know two people with Challengers; one is a woman in her mid 50's and the other is a man in his early 20's. Both have V6 models. The guy actually is on his second Challenger, he upgraded when the Pentastar came out. Both say they love the Challenger because of it's looks, interior space, and performance in that order. I think after all the media whining about the Challengers weight and how the performance doesn't quite match the Mustang or Camaro, the facts are the public doesn't care or can't tell the difference performance wise but love the style and roominess of the Challenger. It's a fantastic grand tourer/muscle car that hits the perfect sweet spot between the luxury coupes and the pony cars.
 
#5 ·
GasAxe said:
I know two people with Challengers; one is a woman in her mid 50's and the other is a man in his early 20's. Both have V6 models. The guy actually is on his second Challenger, he upgraded when the Pentastar came out. Both say they love the Challenger because of it's looks, interior space, and performance in that order. I think after all the media whining about the Challengers weight and how the performance doesn't quite match the Mustang or Camaro, the facts are the public doesn't care or can't tell the difference performance wise but love the style and roominess of the Challenger. It's a fantastic grand tourer/muscle car that hits the perfect sweet spot between the luxury coupes and the pony cars.
If you're not trying to be the fastest from stoplight to stoplight then the V-6 may be plenty quick enough and might just handle better than the V-8s.
 
#6 ·
It's also THE ONLY alternative body style offered in the Chrysler Group car lineup.

So for all you who keep insisting that there is no market for coupes and convertibles, JUST LOOK at Challenger.

If they would get around to a convertible then sales would increase substantially again, despite what the "experts" here and elsewhere keep trying to sell us.( pure Kool Aid )

Another reason why the Wrangler does so well, alternative body styles for the non-sheep drivers.
 
#7 ·
In 2008 I couldn't afford one. By 2012, I could. I think the strengthening economy has helped. Being a 2 door, it's the only Mopar I would consider.
 
#8 ·
GasAxe said:
I know two people with Challengers; one is a woman in her mid 50's and the other is a man in his early 20's. Both have V6 models. The guy actually is on his second Challenger, he upgraded when the Pentastar came out. Both say they love the Challenger because of it's looks, interior space, and performance in that order. I think after all the media whining about the Challengers weight and how the performance doesn't quite match the Mustang or Camaro, the facts are the public doesn't care or can't tell the difference performance wise but love the style and roominess of the Challenger. It's a fantastic grand tourer/muscle car that hits the perfect sweet spot between the luxury coupes and the pony cars.
The Challenger lineup is centered around the R/T, and you can bet those guys take performance numbers, and comparisons to Mustang and Camaro very seriously.

But as others have said, Challenger offers a more refined, all-around alternative than the other two.

Daytona Dude said:
In 2008 I couldn't afford one. By 2012, I could. I think the strengthening economy has helped. Being a 2 door, it's the only Mopar I would consider.
Definitely. But Challenger's sales curve has been growing more the steadily than that of Mustang or Camaro, over the same period of time.
 
#9 ·
If I could afford a second newer car, I'd find a close twin to the Challenger I sold earlier this year. I loved the redline 3 coat and I was quite satisfied with the 3.6 though I'd sure love a Hemi. If I won the lottery, I'd have one converted to a convertible.

I had the Challenger just less than 2 years. 14k trouble free miles other than road damage to two tires. Thanks to a very good deal at purchase, the Challenger's higher residual value sure made the trade in easy financially. I hated to sell it, but I needed a 4 door car.