Allpar Forums banner
701 - 720 of 764 Posts
Us Canadians are ready for the Journey to be put to pasture, but I wouldn't mind another decade of Grand Caravan tbh.
 
And I think a lot of that depreciation is driven by lack of demand - which goes back to point of customers not even knowing it exists anymore. In the heyday of the 300, it was the PRIMARY advertisement for the L-series cars. Now it gets zero airtime and it's been that way for years. A lot of it is due to FCA's indecision about what to do with Chrysler as a brand, and the shrinking of the # of offerings in Chrysler overall. They just can't justify the investment in the brand from an ad perspective the way they can with Dodge.

@Mark Powers is also right about inventory levels. It's damned near impossible to find a 300 with the HEMI, or a top of the line 300 at all. There are very few 300s on lots relative to Charger or Challenger at most dealers.

This problem is a BRAND problem for FCA, and much like reviving Alfa, at some point they'll have to invest billions to revive Chrysler. At this point it's been basically ignored for almost a decade, which is two full cycles in the auto universe.
Currently there are 181 new 2018 Chrysler 300s with HEMIs on Cars.com for sale. 3,783 new 2018 Chrysler 300s with Pentastar power are sale on there as well. So you can see where the intake of what dealers order for inventory. 1,358 new 2018 Chrysler 300s on there are AWD. Interesting to think about.

Just for reference, there are currently 17,090 new 2018 Dodge Chargers on Cars.com, and 4,938 of them are HEMI powered cars. 3,514 of those new 2018 Dodge Chargers are AWD.

As for Chrysler not advertising the 300 as much as they should... you should look at their social media accounts. Where Chrysler Pacifica gets most of the TV time, 300 dominates their social media accounts.

Image


They post a lot more about the Chrysler 300 then they do the Pacifica on Facebook...

Image


On instagram...

Image


As you can see from twitter, the same goes for it as well...
 
But here, the Chargers hold their value much better. It seems that it's not just that the 300C is a sedan, I think it is because the 300C is more of an "old person's car", whereas the Charger appeals to younger people.
It's true...

A mainstream brand that won't be like the mainstream
"You have 290 different vehicles to choose from in the marketplace, sold by 40 different brands," Kuniskis said. "It's getting very confusing. People are getting numb to all the choices. They're looking for something that's going to be fun, unique, different."

That's where Dodge comes in.

As Kuniskis sees it, car shoppers are faced with a sea of boring choices. He sees a huge opportunity for Dodge to become the not-boring alternative, the brand that offers "mainstream performance."

That means fire-breathing Hemi V8s, but it also means cars that are fuel-efficient and sensible, even while bringing some of the excitement of their tire-burning siblings.

For the new Dodge, it all starts with the Charger
For Kuniskis, this begins with the Dodge Charger.

The Charger is a full-sized four-door sedan. On paper, it competes with cars such as Toyota's (NYSE:TM) Avalon, Ford's (NYSE:F) Taurus, and General Motors' (NYSE:GM) Chevrolet Impala.

But in real life, "27% of Charger buyers didn't cross-shop it against anything," Kuniskis said. In other words, they didn't shop around: They wanted a Charger, and that's what they bought.

Why? Because the Charger isn't like an Avalon or an Impala.

Sure, you can get a Charger with a fuel-efficient V6 engine backed by a high-tech eight-speed transmission, a combination that gets an EPA-rated 19 miles per gallon in the city, 31 highway -- right in the same ballpark as the V6-powered versions of the Impala and Avalon.

Equipped that way, it's a roomy and practical four-door sedan.

But the Charger is also offered with two different Hemi V8s that turn it into a seriously fast high-performance car that also happens to be a roomy and practical four-door sedan.

Toyota and Ford have nothing like it. And even though the V6 Charger looks a lot like an Avalon on paper, its Hemi-powered siblings give it an image, an appeal, that Toyota can't match.

That makes it unique. And it works: The Charger's retail sales growth has far outpaced the overall growth of the full-sized car segment over the last five years. It now outsells both the Avalon and the Taurus by wide margins.

Now Kuniskis wants every Dodge to be the Charger of its segment.

The Challenger is about a lot more than the Hellcat
The "halo effect" that sells all those V6 Chargers is what Kuniskis means when he talks about "mainstream performance." Not every Dodge is going to be an expensive high-performance car. But all Dodges will benefit from the excitement of the brand's high-performance image, he thinks.

Dodge as a brand already does a good job of attracting younger buyers. The average Dodge buyer is 10 years younger than the average Chevy buyer, nine years younger than Ford's, and eight years younger than Toyota's, according to Kuniskis.

He plans to build on that advantage by using Dodge's standout high-performance models to add excitement to the more practical choices in Dodge's lineup.

Consider the Charger's sibling, the retro-styled two-door Challenger coupe.

Lately, the attention-getter for Dodge has been the new 707-horsepower Hellcat version of the refreshed-for-2015 Challenger. It's a monster, with eye-popping acceleration numbers.

But Kuniskis loves to point to the base-model Challenger, the SXT, which is powered by a 300-horsepower V6.

Noting that the average "pony car" on the road today is 12 years old, Kuniskis said the V6 Challenger with the eight-speed automatic transmission will outperform a 12-year-old V8-powered Ford Mustang or Chevy Camaro -- while getting 30 miles per gallon on the highway.

And he noted that the Challenger is almost as practical as a mainstream four-door sedan. Sure, it's a two-door, but it's a big two-door, with a back seat that is comfortable for adults.

As Kuniskis tells it, that makes it an intriguing alternative to something like a Toyota Camry. He thinks more buyers -- particularly younger ones -- will be looking for "fun, unique, different" alternatives to cars like the Camry over the next several years.

How the rest of Dodge will become a "performance" brand
So how does this idea fit with the rest of Dodge's lineup?

In some places, Kuniskis said, it fits just fine. The handsome Durango crossover "is already the Charger of its segment," according to the CEO, thanks to the vehicle's rugged good looks and its available Hemi V8.

But some Dodges will need work: The compact Dart will get a stylistic makeover and a performance bump when it is refreshed in 2016, he said, while a new compact crossover that reflects Dodge's updated brand values will replace the Journey at about the same time. Both will be available in turbocharged high-performance versions.

And, of course, the rental-darling midsize Avenger sedan is already gone, and the iconic Grand Caravan minivan will be discontinued soon.

Those decisions make sense when you consider that Dodges are sold in showrooms that also offer Chrysler, Jeep, and Ram vehicles.

Under the new plan, Chrysler will sell the minivans and mainstream sedans, while Jeep has the trail-ready SUVs and Ram offers the pickups and commercial vehicles.

But it's Dodge, with its roaring Hemi V8s -- and its fuel-efficient smaller engines -- that will draw the buyers looking for something different.

Kuniskis said he thinks there will be an increasing number of those buyers in the years to come, and he plans to have just what they're looking for.

Why the 2015 Dodge Charger Is Key to Fiat Chrysler's Plan (at https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/07/29/why-the-2015-dodge-charger-is-key-to-fiat-chrysler.aspx )
 
It's true...

A mainstream brand that won't be like the mainstream
"You have 290 different vehicles to choose from in the marketplace, sold by 40 different brands," Kuniskis said. "It's getting very confusing. People are getting numb to all the choices. They're looking for something that's going to be fun, unique, different."

That's where Dodge comes in.

As Kuniskis sees it, car shoppers are faced with a sea of boring choices. He sees a huge opportunity for Dodge to become the not-boring alternative, the brand that offers "mainstream performance."

That means fire-breathing Hemi V8s, but it also means cars that are fuel-efficient and sensible, even while bringing some of the excitement of their tire-burning siblings.

For the new Dodge, it all starts with the Charger
For Kuniskis, this begins with the Dodge Charger.

The Charger is a full-sized four-door sedan. On paper, it competes with cars such as Toyota's (NYSE:TM) Avalon, Ford's (NYSE:F) Taurus, and General Motors' (NYSE:GM) Chevrolet Impala.

But in real life, "27% of Charger buyers didn't cross-shop it against anything," Kuniskis said. In other words, they didn't shop around: They wanted a Charger, and that's what they bought.

Why? Because the Charger isn't like an Avalon or an Impala.

Sure, you can get a Charger with a fuel-efficient V6 engine backed by a high-tech eight-speed transmission, a combination that gets an EPA-rated 19 miles per gallon in the city, 31 highway -- right in the same ballpark as the V6-powered versions of the Impala and Avalon.

Equipped that way, it's a roomy and practical four-door sedan.

But the Charger is also offered with two different Hemi V8s that turn it into a seriously fast high-performance car that also happens to be a roomy and practical four-door sedan.

Toyota and Ford have nothing like it. And even though the V6 Charger looks a lot like an Avalon on paper, its Hemi-powered siblings give it an image, an appeal, that Toyota can't match.

That makes it unique. And it works: The Charger's retail sales growth has far outpaced the overall growth of the full-sized car segment over the last five years. It now outsells both the Avalon and the Taurus by wide margins.

Now Kuniskis wants every Dodge to be the Charger of its segment.

The Challenger is about a lot more than the Hellcat
The "halo effect" that sells all those V6 Chargers is what Kuniskis means when he talks about "mainstream performance." Not every Dodge is going to be an expensive high-performance car. But all Dodges will benefit from the excitement of the brand's high-performance image, he thinks.

Dodge as a brand already does a good job of attracting younger buyers. The average Dodge buyer is 10 years younger than the average Chevy buyer, nine years younger than Ford's, and eight years younger than Toyota's, according to Kuniskis.

He plans to build on that advantage by using Dodge's standout high-performance models to add excitement to the more practical choices in Dodge's lineup.

Consider the Charger's sibling, the retro-styled two-door Challenger coupe.

Lately, the attention-getter for Dodge has been the new 707-horsepower Hellcat version of the refreshed-for-2015 Challenger. It's a monster, with eye-popping acceleration numbers.

But Kuniskis loves to point to the base-model Challenger, the SXT, which is powered by a 300-horsepower V6.

Noting that the average "pony car" on the road today is 12 years old, Kuniskis said the V6 Challenger with the eight-speed automatic transmission will outperform a 12-year-old V8-powered Ford Mustang or Chevy Camaro -- while getting 30 miles per gallon on the highway.

And he noted that the Challenger is almost as practical as a mainstream four-door sedan. Sure, it's a two-door, but it's a big two-door, with a back seat that is comfortable for adults.

As Kuniskis tells it, that makes it an intriguing alternative to something like a Toyota Camry. He thinks more buyers -- particularly younger ones -- will be looking for "fun, unique, different" alternatives to cars like the Camry over the next several years.

How the rest of Dodge will become a "performance" brand
So how does this idea fit with the rest of Dodge's lineup?

In some places, Kuniskis said, it fits just fine. The handsome Durango crossover "is already the Charger of its segment," according to the CEO, thanks to the vehicle's rugged good looks and its available Hemi V8.

But some Dodges will need work: The compact Dart will get a stylistic makeover and a performance bump when it is refreshed in 2016, he said, while a new compact crossover that reflects Dodge's updated brand values will replace the Journey at about the same time. Both will be available in turbocharged high-performance versions.

And, of course, the rental-darling midsize Avenger sedan is already gone, and the iconic Grand Caravan minivan will be discontinued soon.

Those decisions make sense when you consider that Dodges are sold in showrooms that also offer Chrysler, Jeep, and Ram vehicles.

Under the new plan, Chrysler will sell the minivans and mainstream sedans, while Jeep has the trail-ready SUVs and Ram offers the pickups and commercial vehicles.

But it's Dodge, with its roaring Hemi V8s -- and its fuel-efficient smaller engines -- that will draw the buyers looking for something different.

Kuniskis said he thinks there will be an increasing number of those buyers in the years to come, and he plans to have just what they're looking for.

Why the 2015 Dodge Charger Is Key to Fiat Chrysler's Plan (at https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/07/29/why-the-2015-dodge-charger-is-key-to-fiat-chrysler.aspx )
I think part of the reason why people don't care for Chrysler being reduced to a "mainstream" brand is it takes all the prestige out of the US side of the company and puts it all in Europe. It harks back to the DCX days when Mercedes Benz treated Chrysler like they didn't know what they were doing and only Europeans could build a proper premium car, while the dumb Yanks just throw an engine made of "melted down bridge girders" (to quote Jeremy Clarkson) into a body hammered together, stuff it with couches, put the whole mess on wheels and call it a day.

Why couldn't Chrysler offer a mainstream car that stands out from the competition style or tech-wise? If they try to out-Civic Honda or out-RAV4 Toyota, they're going to lose, just like every other time they've tried that.
 
I think part of the reason why people don't care for Chrysler being reduced to a "mainstream" brand is it takes all the prestige out of the US side of the company and puts it all in Europe. It harks back to the DCX days when Mercedes Benz treated Chrysler like they didn't know what they were doing and only Europeans could build a proper premium car, while the dumb Yanks just throw an engine made of "melted down bridge girders" (to quote Jeremy Clarkson) into a body hammered together, stuff it with couches, put the whole mess on wheels and call it a day.

Why couldn't Chrysler offer a mainstream car that stands out from the competition style or tech-wise? If they try to out-Civic Honda or out-RAV4 Toyota, they're going to lose, just like every other time they've tried that.
Good point. But the 300C and the Pacifica Limited show that mainstream doesn't have to just cheap blue collar (Yank) rides...

Image


Image


Chrysler offers their affordable luxury trims.
 
Renaming the Sebring and cleaning up the styling does not make it “all new” although the refresh WAS incredible. Quite frankly I’m still shocked the 200 didn’t do better.
 
owns 2023 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Series III
  • Like
Reactions: UN4GTBL
You must be blind. How do you figure nothing has been done to 300. I stated facts and showed proof of how it has changed. Saying a comment like that make you sound like one of the fools who say the earth is flat with no proof! lol. I want to see physical proof of what you are challenging me on. Because I can easily say, any vehicle doesn't change year to year anymore. Yet, trim packages, finishes, paints, wheels, options do all the time. This isn't the 50s, 60s and 70s anymore, where they change major details to the car year to year anymore. Maybe if you are so unhappy with the car, go buy a Buick. They will sell you a bland sedan, which sounds like might up your alley. Wow. I don't think even winning the Powerball could make you happy. Your purple flavor-aid cup is half empty, sir.
You did not read my original statement, in your response, if you go back you will see that I said the 300 has received a substantial under the skin treatment in 2015.

The problem is to non enthusiasts it still looks mostly the same. Put a 2014 300S next to a 2015 300S a person like you and me which are enthusiast will see the difference immediately. A person that's shopping may not and probably don't see it at all. But let's look at your chargers compared to the new charger big difference. Which also spark sales when a visual difference happens. I'll give you a great view of how visual change and interior upgrades can spark a vehicle. Look at the last year's lincoln navigator. No one cared, it sold some numbers not enough to be really noticed not making any news in the industry but once was a great name back mid 2000s. Lincoln seen opportunity to completely change the mantra let's do everything we did right in 2003 to 2006 but turn it up. Let's stop adding trims and colors to the same vehicle and expect a huge result. Let's improve the interior let's make the vehicle look like a completely new vehicle let's make it bold and aggressive and see what happens. This is the message chrysler should take and learn from, now lincoln can sell navigators for 5k over msrp they can't make enough because they did the exact thing opposite of what FCA did with a once noble nameplate. Sounds like the 300 of 2005 to me.

I just wish someone at FCA sometimes took the opinion of non company sheep and wonder why those that have spent money is not happy with the direction of where they taking Chrysler in stead of trying to invent a market that they have no expertise in.
 
I just wish someone at FCA sometimes took the opinion of non company sheep and wonder why those that have spent money is not happy with the direction of where they taking Chrysler in stead of trying to invent a market that they have no expertise in.
Your wish has been answered, as Kuniskis is now in a position to make sure that Dodge-Alfa will run the sport side of FCA.

The mistake you make in trying to sell all that "fools gold" you offered so kindly to RedRiderBob, the mistake is: that you live in the past.

The position of the Chrysler brand on the Fiat Chrysler corporate umbrella list is just above Lancia.
(and the important word is Brand as in Chrysler brand, because the car company and all it stood for does not exist any more).

Therefore the 300 and all that it stands for has been reduced to the same level as the Journey and Grand Caravan: cash cow.

It will last for as long that FCA thinks it makes any money and that will be that.

It is what it is.

And the thing is: the Dodge brand is far more important in the future of FCA than the Chrysler brand.

Trust Tim Kuniskis is my advice.
 
You did not read my original statement, in your response, if you go back you will see that I said the 300 has received a substantial under the skin treatment in 2015.

The problem is to non enthusiasts it still looks mostly the same. Put a 2014 300S next to a 2015 300S a person like you and me which are enthusiast will see the difference immediately. A person that's shopping may not and probably don't see it at all. But let's look at your chargers compared to the new charger big difference. Which also spark sales when a visual difference happens. I'll give you a great view of how visual change and interior upgrades can spark a vehicle. Look at the last year's lincoln navigator. No one cared, it sold some numbers not enough to be really noticed not making any news in the industry but once was a great name back mid 2000s. Lincoln seen opportunity to completely change the mantra let's do everything we did right in 2003 to 2006 but turn it up. Let's stop adding trims and colors to the same vehicle and expect a huge result. Let's improve the interior let's make the vehicle look like a completely new vehicle let's make it bold and aggressive and see what happens. This is the message chrysler should take and learn from, now lincoln can sell navigators for 5k over msrp they can't make enough because they did the exact thing opposite of what FCA did with a once noble nameplate. Sounds like the 300 of 2005 to me.

I just wish someone at FCA sometimes took the opinion of non company sheep and wonder why those that have spent money is not happy with the direction of where they taking Chrysler in stead of trying to invent a market that they have no expertise in.
Ok? That would like saying a person can't see the different between the 2012 Ram 1500 vs 2013 Ram 1500, yet they both sold hundreds of thousands of them! Goes to show you its not necessarily the product as so much the market for the segment. With the sedan segment shrinking you think FCA US should invest more money into a model that will more than likely disappear in two more model years?

You're crazy and obviously don't know the first thing of business. If that was presented to the board at FCA, they would simply laugh until you left the room. Every company would in fact.

As for the 2014 Charger vs the 2015 Charger, the design change was to push the car past the frontal looks which were similar from the 2006-2010 and 2011-2014 models to somewhere with the Dart. Remember the 300 in 2011, looked similar yet drastically different than the 2005-2010 model it replaced.

Example...

Image

Top: 2005 Chrysler 300C, Middle: 2011 Chrysler 300C, Bottom: 2015 Chrysler 300S.

Quite a change between them. If you recall the 2008 Chrysler 300 got a mild revision with new tail lights and wheels, where the 2015 car got revisited transmissions, styling, interior materials and features. Yet I don't hear complaining about that. But look at the different from the 2005 to 2011 300.

Image


Now lets look at Charger. Styling for the front end of the 2011 model year was an evolution from its 2005 counterpart. With Dodge design language changing with vehicles like the Dart it got a styling change.

So in hindsight you are complaining that the lack of making the 300 drastically different looking is what is settling itself back, you are far mistaken. The market for sedan is shrinking. GM has slowed production of its 300 competitor the Impala as well as the rest of its big car lineup. Ford's 300 competitor the Taurus is selling slow as well to the point they might discontinue it in North America (China would be the only continuing market). You can read more here...

Ford Considers Killing off Taurus in 2018 (at http://www.thedrive.com/news/12879/ford-considers-killing-off-taurus-in-2018 )


Ford's Taurus Police Interceptor is being outsold by the Explorer Police Interceptor 7 to 1. Charger is the best selling Police sedan, as well as has someone youngest democraphics at the mean age of 40. That is why it will live on.

Chrysler tried to build on the Charger's demographic with the 300S. 300S is 50% of 300 sales and the average 300S buyer is 48 years old. That is 8 years older than the average Charger buyer. Also the rest of the full sedan segments mean age for demographics is 61 years old.

Here is a whole article you can read about Chrysler and the 300 trying to attract youngers...

Chrysler says 300S lures younger buyers (at https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2015/03/23/chrysler-300-younger-buyers/70345564/ )

So @randy1911 I have yet to see you provide facts to back up any of your statements.

If you look at Chrysler 300 sales since 2005. 300 was hot pushing over 130k to 150k in sedans for the 2005 to 2007 model year in the US and Canada. In 2008, sales began to slow way down and that was the introduction of new trims and minor update to 70k. 2009 to 2011 were the worst years for the 300 with only 39k to 42k units sold. The 2011 refresh didn't seem to pickup sales until 2012, selling 76k units in US and Canada. 2013 to the Present the car stays steady with 55k to 62k with numbers decreasing from 2013.

For the past eight years, Charger has been selling steadily in the high-90k units for the US and Canada. That only includes civilian models, since law enforcement numbers aren't included in the public sale numbers.

So again you have a car that sales are descreasing on which will probably end production in two model years and one that sells steady for the past decade with double the sales numbers. That doesn't include the thousands you sell to law enforcement. Which would you investment more into?
 
Ok? That would like saying a person can't see the different between the 2012 Ram 1500 vs 2013 Ram 1500, yet they both sold hundreds of thousands of them! Goes to show you its not necessarily the product as so much the market for the segment. With the sedan segment shrinking you think FCA US should invest more money into a model that will more than likely disappear in two more model years?

You're crazy and obviously don't know the first thing of business. If that was presented to the board at FCA, they would simply laugh until you left the room. Every company would in fact.

As for the 2014 Charger vs the 2015 Charger, the design change was to push the car past the frontal looks which were similar from the 2006-2010 and 2011-2014 models to somewhere with the Dart. Remember the 300 in 2011, looked similar yet drastically different than the 2005-2010 model it replaced.

Example...

View attachment 15289
Top: 2005 Chrysler 300C, Middle: 2011 Chrysler 300C, Bottom: 2015 Chrysler 300S.

Quite a change between them. If you recall the 2008 Chrysler 300 got a mild revision with new tail lights and wheels, where the 2015 car got revisited transmissions, styling, interior materials and features. Yet I don't hear complaining about that. But look at the different from the 2005 to 2011 300.

View attachment 15291

Now lets look at Charger. Styling for the front end of the 2011 model year was an evolution from its 2005 counterpart. With Dodge design language changing with vehicles like the Dart it got a styling change.

So in hindsight you are complaining that the lack of making the 300 drastically different looking is what is settling itself back, you are far mistaken. The market for sedan is shrinking. GM has slowed production of its 300 competitor the Impala as well as the rest of its big car lineup. Ford's 300 competitor the Taurus is selling slow as well to the point they might discontinue it in North America (China would be the only continuing market). You can read more here...

Ford Considers Killing off Taurus in 2018 (at http://www.thedrive.com/news/12879/ford-considers-killing-off-taurus-in-2018 )


Ford's Taurus Police Interceptor is being outsold by the Explorer Police Interceptor 7 to 1. Charger is the best selling Police sedan, as well as has someone youngest democraphics at the mean age of 40. That is why it will live on.

Chrysler tried to build on the Charger's demographic with the 300S. 300S is 50% of 300 sales and the average 300S buyer is 48 years old. That is 8 years older than the average Charger buyer. Also the rest of the full sedan segments mean age for demographics is 61 years old.

Here is a whole article you can read about Chrysler and the 300 trying to attract youngers...

Chrysler says 300S lures younger buyers (at https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2015/03/23/chrysler-300-younger-buyers/70345564/ )

So @randy1911 I have yet to see you provide facts to back up any of your statements.

If you look at Chrysler 300 sales since 2005. 300 was hot pushing over 130k to 150k in sedans for the 2005 to 2007 model year in the US and Canada. In 2008, sales began to slow way down and that was the introduction of new trims and minor update to 70k. 2009 to 2011 were the worst years for the 300 with only 39k to 42k units sold. The 2011 refresh didn't seem to pickup sales until 2012, selling 76k units in US and Canada. 2013 to the Present the car stays steady with 55k to 62k with numbers decreasing from 2013.

For the past eight years, Charger has been selling steadily in the high-90k units for the US and Canada. That only includes civilian models, since law enforcement numbers aren't included in the public sale numbers.

So again you have a car that sales are descreasing on which will probably end production in two model years and one that sells steady for the past decade with double the sales numbers. That doesn't include the thousands you sell to law enforcement. Which would you investment more into?
Yes you hit it on the head with two of your points and I will elaborate. In your post you stated that
"

Chrysler tried to build on the Charger's demographic with the 300S. 300S is 50% of 300 sales and the average 300S buyer is 48 years old. That is 8 years older than the average Charger buyer. Also the rest of the full sedan segments mean age for demographics is 61 years old.

That's the thing right there FCA did a halfa## job they gave the 300s which led to half the 300 being s versions but they did not provide the engines or the trims to match. (Please don't say srt appearance it's just plastic with no substance) Knowing alot of salesmen and dealerships, people go into the dealer wanting a scat pack or an srt or even a hellcat charger, once they get there alot of people find out they can only afford a RT or Sxt it still produces sales and it stays relevant in the media. The 300 has a S and a C but people go into the dealership as FCA has figured out wanting mostly an S what what would happen if the engines along with exotic trims and special old versions like a 300m special edition just like a Charger daytona. People would go into dealerships wanting those higher end 300s ever ones talking about just like the chargers but getting a regular 300 or limited. What would happen if Chrysler did more than half the job of just giving it a S version and gave it others?

Second thing you stated was Chevy, Ford and other reducing the sedan production due to changing market. The 300 has always been a top 3 sedan after the cheaper charger always, Chevy and Ford reducing their sedan production will help 300 sales not hurt. You want proof here u go, Point of reference let's look at cadillac the xts for example its the large sedan as you know, what are those sales doing once the refresh happend it increased... Oh my goodness a large sedan increased sales in a shrinking sedan market. Yes why because it was refreshed not from the inside but 95 percent on the outside visually. On the inside its 98 percent the same car sold in 2013 as sold 2018 but the sales increased because visually the refresh looks different. No not in a super shrinking market yes in a super shrinking market a sedan that has been the same since 2013 mechanically is selling more why the appearance.

I already understand the 300's fate is what it is but I still believe that FCA failed the 300 and not the market fault as they would like to believe. It was the leave it on a vine to do what ever it can that put it in the current position its in and it still won 2 awards in the past year, so again its all FCA. Even if you don't agree, the cadillac example backs my argument of a large sedan gaining sales in a shrinking market if it's given the correct tlc and not a life support diagnosis. Look at the past January sales of the xts vs a year ago that's as recent as u can can get what happen an increase but an xts is not a suv or cuv but it increased.
 
Yes you hit it on the head with two of your points and I will elaborate. In your post you stated that
"

Chrysler tried to build on the Charger's demographic with the 300S. 300S is 50% of 300 sales and the average 300S buyer is 48 years old. That is 8 years older than the average Charger buyer. Also the rest of the full sedan segments mean age for demographics is 61 years old.

That's the thing right there FCA did a halfa## job they gave the 300s which led to half the 300 being s versions but they did not provide the engines or the trims to match. (Please don't say srt appearance it's just plastic with no substance) Knowing alot of salesmen and dealerships, people go into the dealer wanting a scat pack or an srt or even a hellcat charger, once they get there alot of people find out they can only afford a RT or Sxt it still produces sales and it stays relevant in the media. The 300 has a S and a C but people go into the dealership as FCA has figured out wanting mostly an S what what would happen if the engines along with exotic trims and special old versions like a 300m special edition just like a Charger daytona. People would go into dealerships wanting those higher end 300s ever ones talking about just like the chargers but getting a regular 300 or limited. What would happen if Chrysler did more than half the job of just giving it a S version and gave it others?

Second thing you stated was Chevy, Ford and other reducing the sedan production due to changing market. The 300 has always been a top 3 sedan after the cheaper charger always, Chevy and Ford reducing their sedan production will help 300 sales not hurt. You want proof here u go, Point of reference let's look at cadillac the xts for example its the large sedan as you know, what are those sales doing once the refresh happend it increased... Oh my goodness a large sedan increased sales in a shrinking sedan market. Yes why because it was refreshed not from the inside but 95 percent on the outside visually. On the inside its 98 percent the same car sold in 2013 as sold 2018 but the sales increased because visually the refresh looks different. No not in a super shrinking market yes in a super shrinking market a sedan that has been the same since 2013 mechanically is selling more why the appearance.

I already understand the 300's fate is what it is but I still believe that FCA failed the 300 and not the market fault as they would like to believe. It was the leave it on a vine to do what ever it can that put it in the current position its in and it still won 2 awards in the past year, so again its all FCA. Even if you don't agree, the cadillac example backs my argument of a large sedan gaining sales in a shrinking market if it's given the correct tlc and not a life support diagnosis. Look at the past January sales of the xts vs a year ago that's as recent as u can can get what happen an increase but an xts is not a suv or cuv but it increased.
I’d be willing to bet that almost everyone who isn’t a car enthusiast can’t tell the difference in the XTS before and after its refresh. Oh, and the XTS is being discontinued too!
 
Note: This is not a political announcement or judgement of any kind, just an observation. If the recently talked about tariffs on imported steel and aluminum come to fruition and especially if combined with the most recent mention of new tariffs on European vehicles things might change. Not too long ago expensive gas drove people out of their SUVs and trucks and back to traditional cars. If the cost of materials to build those behemoths increases it will be reflected as increased cost to the consumer. Depending on how expensive they get traditional sedans such as the 300 may become a more attractive alternative.
 
701 - 720 of 764 Posts