Touché!Laugh it up! At least I never owned a FIAT !! hahaha...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Trail Rated perhaps?my Fiat 124 Spider is the only two-door car I have owned that clears parking stops and sidewalks without scraping the front air dam.
They didn’t say capable, they said 100% capable. What the heck does that even mean? A FWD vehicle may have some degree of capability, but it’s not on the same level as 4WD or even AWD. Pretending otherwise is foolish.2wd is capable. Every trim level doesn't have to be the TOP OF THE LINE BEST IN CLASS ALL THE THINGs. That's what keeps them expensive. e.e
If people don’t care, then why not make it a Chrysler or Dodge instead? Those brands would be better suited for a starter vehicle, certainly not Jeep which is supposed to be premium. I guess we’ve learned nothing from the failures of the recent soft-roaders.Exactly; and a lot of people, they really don't care - they need starter vehicles more than anything else in the lineup. Especially here.
I can say the same about my old Escort, and my wife’s Encore. Neither of them should be the measuring stick for what it is to be a Jeep.I NEVER got stuck in my 1987, 2.2, 5 speed Dodge Omni in snow and icy conditions.
It was capable.
Race to the bottom - a little dramatic? They literally need to get the cheap Jeeps back. Killing off the Cheapest model they had was the dumbest thing they could've done. 2wd models get Jeeps on Roads & believe it or not -MOST Jeep owners never go off pavement. So give them a vehicle that does really well in Snow (and it can be fwd) and they'll be golden. It's not about ACTUAL capability. It's about perception of capability. Marketing. Jeep is the off-road brand - but that doesn't mean every single one has to be the best of the best. That's a good way to kill the brand by narrowing the scope too much.What does that even mean...?
It can drive in the rain without stalling, it can drive over sidewalks and parking stops without getting stuck...?
Jeep's race to the bottom is never-ending.
They could - But they won't. Jeep has the international presence that Dodge & Chrysler don't. Why do you think the Airflow & rumored Stealth were canned in favor of the Wagoneer S?If people don’t care, then why not make it a Chrysler or Dodge instead? Those brands would be better suited for a starter vehicle, certainly not Jeep which is supposed to be premium. I guess we’ve learned nothing from the failures of the recent soft-roaders.
Kiilling off the cheapest 2WD Jeep was smart. Not making a Dodge to replace it was stupid.Race to the bottom - a little dramatic? They literally need to get the cheap Jeeps back. Killing off the Cheapest model they had was the dumbest thing they could've done. 2wd models get Jeeps on Roads & believe it or not -MOST Jeep owners never go off pavement. So give them a vehicle that does really well in Snow (and it can be fwd) and they'll be golden. It's not about ACTUAL capability. It's about perception of capability. Marketing. Jeep is the off-road brand - but that doesn't mean every single one has to be the best of the best. That's a good way to kill the brand by narrowing the scope too much.
2wd Renegades sold, 2wd Wranglers sell, 2wd Rams sell. Don't act like it's so offensive to even have 2wd models. It's beyond stupid when they've always been 4wd-optional. Even back to when Jeep was Willys. The purists are what'll kill Jeep - and Dodge.
I think I'll actually agree with that. It's a solid way to use the brands in an intelligent way. So long as we don't end up with another Hornet. (bumper-engineered bullsh*t)Kiilling off the cheapest 2WD Jeep was smart. Not making a Dodge to replace it was stupid.
That just proves that customers do care, they want a Jeep. However, what they’re getting is that starter car, only with Jeep styling and inflated pricing without the level of capability to go with it.They could - But they won't. Jeep has the international presence that Dodge & Chrysler don't. Why do you think the Airflow & rumored Stealth were canned in favor of the Wagoneer S?
I never said it was..... That's your statement.I can say the same about my old Escort, and my wife’s Encore. Neither of them should be the measuring stick for what it is to be a Jeep.
Yes, you said it in regards to the capability level of 2wd Jeeps in this discussion.DC-93 said:
I NEVER got stuck in my 1987, 2.2, 5 speed Dodge Omni in snow and icy conditions.
It was capable.
I never said it was..... That's your statement.
New Jeep?
View attachment 111734
This type of mindset is precisely what killed Plymouth, Chrysler, Dodge.Race to the bottom - a little dramatic? They literally need to get the cheap Jeeps back. Killing off the Cheapest model they had was the dumbest thing they could've done. 2wd models get Jeeps on Roads & believe it or not -MOST Jeep owners never go off pavement. So give them a vehicle that does really well in Snow (and it can be fwd) and they'll be golden. It's not about ACTUAL capability. It's about perception of capability. Marketing. Jeep is the off-road brand - but that doesn't mean every single one has to be the best of the best. That's a good way to kill the brand by narrowing the scope too much.
2wd Renegades sold, 2wd Wranglers sell, 2wd Rams sell. Don't act like it's so offensive to even have 2wd models.
Or a Peugeot, or a Citroen, or a Lancia! They all have a strong rally racing heritage in Europe, Middle East and Africa.If people don’t care, then why not make it a Chrysler or Dodge instead? Those brands would be better suited for a starter vehicle, certainly not Jeep which is supposed to be premium. I guess we’ve learned nothing from the failures of the recent soft-roaders.
New Jeep?
View attachment 111734
It’s been done. At least, it’s been done as a Miata. I suggested this “mod” to @aldo90731 for his Spyder, but so far no go.That is the new Fiat Spyder Jeep